" FLUOPRAZOLAM": ???? NEW!!!

And yes it's spelled correctly, it popped up on some very reliable clearnet vendor sites but there's not general, in any information online about the substance. Has any one here ever her of it or can provide me some insight or any information you have on it please.

I feel like they probably misspelled it I know you didn't but maybe the vendor did

no, it's new. it was just made by a large scale distributor that's in the approved section.
everyone else is 99% sourcing it through them.
if you look up the formula, that distributor's website is the only result that matches.

xenxra said:

no, it's new. it was just made by a large scale distributor that's in the approved section.
everyone else is 99% sourcing it through them.
if you look up the formula, that distributor's website is the only result that matches.

Click to expand...

How do you look up the formula through the distributor's website?

davidbanner62 said:

How do you look up the formula through the distributor's website?

Click to expand...

you go on their website and it's right there next to the iupac on the product page.

Would love to see some reports on it, I imagine some will come eventually. If it's worth anything I'd love to get in on it before the price goes up

When I search it something else comes up called loprazolam

ms3031 said:

Would love to see some reports on it, I imagine some will come eventually. If it's worth anything I'd love to get in on it before the price goes up

Click to expand...

Yea there's no trip reports on this substance, absolutely ZERO not reddit, psychonaught, nobody. But I trust the chemistry behind & will most definitely make a purchase this week and let you know how it goes when it lands in a couple of weeks, and this mag is so new that even in that long of a time period I'm pretty sure I'll be the first to report on it lol.

yeah I’m gonna purchase some for sure

F33n said:

Eh the people on researchchemicals think it’s going to be shitty. I’d wait for some experience reports before buying it.

Click to expand...

Whaaat I don't understand how that could be, from what I’m hearing there saying lower potency by weight, longer hypnotic effect, greater duration, and active under 1mg! That sounds awesome unlike shitty clobro on the other hand that takes an hour to come into effect, and to make matters worse the clobro comes with a serious case of DOS (delusion of sobriety) so when you’re actually high, you don’t even feel high like cmmonnn. I can’t imagine that Fluoalp is gonna be that shitty noway.

davidbanner62 said:

Whaaat I don't understand how that could be, from what I’m hearing there saying lower potency by weight, longer hypnotic effect, greater duration, and active under 1mg! That sounds awesome unlike shitty clobro on the other hand that takes an hour to come into effect, and to make matters worse the clobro comes with a serious case of DOS (delusion of sobriety) so when you’re actually high, you don’t even feel high like cmmonnn. I can’t imagine that Fluoalp is gonna be that shitty noway.

Click to expand...

Eh people are just guessing what the effects will be but I’ve heard nothing but bad things. It’s suppose to be a misleading name and nothing like alprazolam. I guess we’ll find out when someone tries it for the first time. Believe me, I’m hoping it’ll be good.

Any news on the this substance. I'm very tempted but I'm not interested in wasting money

At this point they should be giving away a trial sample lol

The Doctor RC said:

When I search it something else comes up called loprazolam

Click to expand...

no its not loprazolam, that's just what they're basing their synthesis for the Fluoalprazolam off of, that's why everyone is confused about the effects of this mag, but me personally I dont think its going to be that bad I definitely think its worth a shot to try, unless loprazolam is just a shitty mag but we will know in a couple weeks. I DEFINENTLY think its going to be better than clobro due to its delusion of sobriety and and due to the fact it takes a hour to feel effects,

davidbanner62 said:

no its not loprazolam, that's just what they're basing their synthesis for the Fluoalprazolam off of, that's why everyone is confused about the effects of this mag, but me personally I dont think its going to be that bad I definitely think its worth a shot to try, unless loprazolam is just a shitty mag but we will know in a couple weeks. I DEFINENTLY think its going to be better than clobro due to its delusion of sobriety and and due to the fact it takes a hour to feel effects,

Click to expand...

I’m assuming you’re not a chemist (and that’s okay!). I am and I’ll give you my opinion if you care. The ending -azol@m is also used for
flu0pr- and alpr-, yes, but also flu@lpr-, flubr0m-, mid-, among others as I’m sure you know. Those are the common chemical names, like you’d call the chemical in Tylenol ‘acetaminophen’, while its IUPAC name (something’s official chemical name that also gives insight into its structure) is N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)acetamide. My point being is that what someone calls something doesn’t make it like something else. Check out the structures of the flu0pr@z and l0pr@z. You’ll see that flu0praz is the same as l0pr@z but with a fluoride (F) substituted for the chloride (Cl). Similar with fluAlpr@z and alpr@z, except flu@l is just a fluoride addition to alpr@z, there’s not a substitution. So Flu@lp and Alpr@z’s structures are quite different from l0pr@z and flu0pr@z.
With that being said, flu0praz might be great for you. I don’t know the ph@rmacol0gy or ph@rmacokinet1cs of it. Just don’t want you to get let down by going into it thinking it’ll be just like flu@lp or @lp or even l0pr@z.
Hope that made sense and cleared some things up.

Thanks so much your input, and I’m no chemist but by the farthest degree trust me none offense taken WHATSOEVER! Hell You guys are like rocket scientist’s in my book, if amazes me how much u guys know about these specific substances. I’m more of a layman when it comes down to specific chemistry. But I would love learn from more from you all if that’s okay, but in your opinion you’re saying that Fluoalp would just be an ineffective , non similar high potent RC benzo like flubro, or flualp, or even fluco. Like a placebo huh if your profession opinion?

davidbanner62 said:

Thanks so much your input, and I’m no chemist but by the farthest degree trust me none offense taken WHATSOEVER! Hell You guys are like rocket scientist’s in my book, if amazes me how much u guys know about these specific substances. I’m more of a layman when it comes down to specific chemistry. But I would love learn from more from you all if that’s okay, but in your opinion you’re saying that Fluoalp would just be an ineffective , non similar high potent RC benzo like flubro, or flualp, or even fluco. Like a placebo huh if your profession opinion?

Click to expand...

No problem! Haha thank you I appreciate that but I’m just passionate about it, anyone can learn it if they’re into it.
No, I don’t think it’ll be placebo. I can’t say anything about p0tency, duration, etc because there aren’t any studies on it yet, at least that I could find. But for an analogy, the closest thing that comes to mind is @lprazol@m and brom@zol@m. Very similar in that brom@z has a bromide (Br) substituted for the chloride on @lprazol@m. So this new magazine coming out may be similar to l0pr@z0lam in the way that the other two I mentioned are. But again I can’t say for sure. The fluoride typically seems to change some things up more like p0tency from what I’ve heard about those fluorinated compounds. There are some reasons I think may cause that but it gets very complicated

Thank you very much for your input @ochemdim
Valuable insight and helpful. I'd hate to be the very first person to put a review out for it but I'd say by this weekend maybe there will be an experience report somewhere, if not might purchase anyway.
Tbh I don't want it to be like flualp or even alp . I'm a big fan of the Japanese rilm so most commonly desired effects are not what I want at all. Benzos are not made for recreational research and the widespread misuse of them cause so much more delinquency in society

I wish this was coming from a vendor account willing to send a small sample…
I mean 5gs for 16@ is insane

ms3031 said:

Thank you very much for your input @ochemdim
Valuable insight and helpful. I'd hate to be the very first person to put a review out for it but I'd say by this weekend maybe there will be an experience report somewhere, if not might purchase anyway.
Tbh I don't want it to be like flualp or even alp . I'm a big fan of the Japanese rilm so most commonly desired effects are not what I want at all. Benzos are not made for recreational research and the widespread misuse of them cause so much more delinquency in society

Click to expand...

Thank you! It was my pleasure.
Yeah I’m sure some people will be willing to be lab rats lol. No judgement, I’ve done it, Just be very careful, test it for F, allergy test, start very low and slow, etc.
So you may have misunderstood me a little. I wasn’t saying it’ll be like flu@alp or @lp (there’s always a possibility, I just don’t know and I don’t know if anyone does yet). I predict it’ll probably be more like l0pr@zol@m because that’s what flu0pr@zol@m is, just with a fluoride in place of a chloride. The producer dropped the beginning ‘L’ of l0pr@z to make it sound a bit misleading or closer to flu@lp is my guess, since they didn’t do that with @lp to flu@lp. I also predict that, more likely than not, it’ll be a bit or a lot stronger than l0pr@z. Again it’s hard to say but fluorinated compounds typically have a stronger effect. Flu@lp is @lp with a fluoride addition, not a substitution. Flu@lp could also be called Flutri@zolam because in that case it’s a fluoride for chloride substitution on tri@zol@m, so same molecular change as l0pr@z to flu0pr@z. Flu@lp (or flutri@zol@m) is stronger than tri@zol@m and @lp I’ve heard. And then flubr0m@z0Lam is an additional bromide for chloride substitution on flu@lp/flutri@z and is far stronger than any. Like I said earlier, there are factors that typically make those substitutions more p0tent but it gets more technical and this post is already too long lol. In short, I can only make a prediction.
I agree with your last point, be careful everyone. Also, I think this new one could be what you’re looking for as l0pr@z isn’t super recreational, or so I’ve read. But I’d just wait for some reports if you have concerns