Benz0 that doesn’t fail a UA?

EffectiveNow

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2025
Messages
4
swim has taken Klonopin in the past and never popped positive on a UA(DroogScreen) , so I’m wondering if there are any other Benz0s that won’t pop hot on a UA ???
 
Thienobenzodiazepines are your friends. Etizolam, deschloro-etizolam, clotizolam, metizolam, those are not gonna pop positive, but I believe most of the more complicated benzos, like the ones that have the triazolo ring (alprazolam, clonazolam, flualprazolam, nitrazolam) shouldn't pop positive either.
 
Thienobenzodiazepines are your friends. Etizolam, deschloro-etizolam, clotizolam, metizolam, those are not gonna pop positive, but I believe most of the more complicated benzos, like the ones that have the triazolo ring (alprazolam, clonazolam, flualprazolam, nitrazolam) shouldn't pop positive either.
sorry, thienodiazepìnes
 
Yup exactly but it's always a roll of the dice really, sometimes these RCs have metavolites that we dont know of and u never know. I wouldn't risk it if on probation. Rivos are quite good themselves.
 
All I can say for certain is 3mg or more a day of flubr0m@z0I@m would pop the instant, but when it got sent to the lab, after disputing it, it would come back as having been a false positive(negative). Over and over lol. Scratching their heads hard.
Taking under 3 mg daily made it so the instant cup wouldn’t pop though

That has to do with antibiodies(what instant cups are looking for)
And metabolites (what the gc ms piss labs are looking for)

It takes some research but you want to choose some b3nzies to look into what they put off as antibodies, and what they put off as metabolites. Then you want to research what antibodies the instant (called immunoassay) cups are looking for, and what metabolites the labs will be looking for.

Typically cl0nazep@m doesn’t pop those instant tests unless you’re taking a lot becuase of similar reasons to the flubr0. Something to do with antibodies. I remember also that it does NOT metabolize into 0x@zep@m, which is the primary, (but I don’t think the only) metabolite looked for under gcms lab tests. I’m also 10 years rusty on this subject so no doubt some things have adapted or changed. Maybe, idk

Good luck
And don’t forget about simply diluting, keeping color up, and keeping creatinine levels high. Beef jerkey is good for that. B12 is good for color but it gets a bit neon
 
Anybody can vouch for some of the posits listed here? Heard about et1z having good/negative results depending on how you look at it. Lol.

Would appreciate it
 
Thienobenzodiazepines are your friends. Etizolam, deschloro-etizolam, clotizolam, metizolam, those are not gonna pop positive, but I believe most of the more complicated benzos, like the ones that have the triazolo ring (alprazolam, clonazolam, flualprazolam, nitrazolam) shouldn't pop positive either.
Etizolam definitely fails UA (in the US at least). LabCorp added it to their standard benzo immunoassay panel shortly after it was scheduled.
 
Thienobenzodiazepines are your friends. Etizolam, deschloro-etizolam, clotizolam, metizolam, those are not gonna pop positive, but I believe most of the more complicated benzos, like the ones that have the triazolo ring (alprazolam, clonazolam, flualprazolam, nitrazolam) shouldn't pop positive either.
I have had almost
All these pop are you sure?
 
I take a pretty hefty amount of bromonor daily, and it hasn't popped my Suboxone clinic tests. Now, I'm honest that I take it, but yeah the second visit after the first UA she was perplexed it didn't pop up for any Valium metabolites. Overall, it was negative for b3nzos. Well technically it isn't one, its of nordiazepam, which is a metabolite of Valium, and I know they test for that.

DONT TAKE THIS AS A YES. It's a no until I get eyes on my UA next week.And I'm glad it's bromonor I'm potentially recommending because it's safety profile compared to say phen@zol@m is night and day.

I'll ask to look at my UAs on the computer next week when I go in to confirm if and why this is the case. It doesn't check out.
 
Last edited:
There is no way to answer this question without knowing about the test. If you want a definitive answer, you need to find out as much about the particular test you're gonna take as you can. Beyond the type of test, it's about economics: the lower the cutoff, the more expensive it becomes. I will tell you a story:

Ihave an addiction history (though MANY years ago at this point), and when I finally clawed my way out of the program I was in and managed to get back to my original psychiatrist, he made a deal with me: "You stay clean, I will forget any of this ever happened. I don't prescribe controlled substances to addicts. We start fresh, and the choice is yours. Or you can try your luck with some other psychiatrist hahahahaa."

Yes, he was laughing. See, he knew that there was precisely NO ONE else who was gonna prescribe an MAOI with 60mg/day of Dex3drine (yes, this is a thing even tho everyone seems to think it makes you stroke out) who I even could see with my insurance who would touch that with a 10-foot pole, that was an offer I couldn't refuse. So I agreed. And he said "Somehow I knew you'd see it my way."

Now, here is my point: in order to demonstrate that I was compliant, he tested me more than I have ever been drug tested before. I was in a program where they did tests, but he wasn't interested in those tests. Oh, no. He knew me better than that lol. He said, "Now the deal is that anytime I call you up and tell you I want a urine, you WILL come and give me a urine. I don't care if you pass the program's tests. You're gonna pass MY tests lol. And I am gonna keep testing you until I am satisfied." See, he was a psychopharmacology professor. He used the hospital system's lab to the max. He showed me how he ordered it. With drug tests, they can test for just about anything. It just costs more. Same with the cutoff. I am absolutely positive that if I had taken ANY benzo at that time, it would have popped. He was prescribing me lor4z3pam at the time for sleep, and the tests he was giving me could tell the difference, im pretty sure.


He actually did me a massive favor by doing this. I never ended up addicted to anything again after MONTHS of that. I still use some drugs now and then, but it put this permanent fear in me lol.

You get what I'm trying to say?
 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. N @ nickelz34: Ty
  2. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @nickelz34 message the admin or gracie
  3. N @ nickelz34: I am an opal sponsor where do I find the password for the pass protected section ?
  4. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: whereas if I use fiat to buy something the money is green anyway. Monero does this really well. Anyway rant over, you can DM me if you'd like to talk more about cryptos.
  5. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: I don't really think that people understand the whole point of cryptos in the first place anymore. BTC just won't be adopted by governments because the transactions are too public and what's worse, money that is freshly minted is better than money that has been used. Like if my btc was used for something that was illegal does that mean the money is "poisoned"?
  6. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @xenxra Yeah, Like I said I've never really been that fond of btc, it isn't used as a currency, just as a place for people to invest money in, even though the whole purpose of btc was to be a currency. If it doesn't fulfill that role, what does? Monero certainly does.
  7. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: What's good guys! Just got back home. Missing football today :( Fuck the probowl lol
  8. shoutback @ shoutback: Volkanovski is the greatest featherweight of all time. Better than Aldo or Holloway at their peaks.
  9. S @ sawganaut: I bet btc bottom is in
  10. D @ dragnetopher: No, I don’t think it. I know it. And it’s not just bitcoin, it’s all crypto. And like I said, they’re selling to acquire liquidity for when countries truly start utilizing what’s been set in place. The USD is under controlled demolition as we speak. This is all part of it.
  11. xenxra @ xenxra: there is no shortage of whales - https://tikolu.net/i/fmnru.png
  12. xenxra @ xenxra: tokenisation is not a plan its already been happening for months, ive been trading this whole move on silver through ethereum
  13. xenxra @ xenxra: you think whales are dumping bitcoin because of something everyone has known about for like 4 years? what does bitcoin liquidity have to do with trading tokenized assets? they don't have pooled liquidity.
  14. D @ dragnetopher: Whales are tanking BTC due to the fact that the future is coming now, literally. There’s a plan to tokenize every single asset possible. This is whales dumping so they can have liquidity for the Springtime.
  15. xenxra @ xenxra: @Gulp2788 this is a terrible spot to buy bitcoin haphazardly because it's going down another $5k -$7k if 80,000 doesn't hold. i told everyone to get the fuck out of bitcoin at $103k. it's better to buy late when the bottom is more certain than throw darts and act like the opposite outcome was unavoidable just because it went down "a lot" and everyone seems to be "freaking out". wait for it to get back over 85k
  16. xenxra @ xenxra: @aarons the last time i said monero was on discount in here it went up 5x in 3 months
  17. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: good opportunity to buy more btc if you are gonna do so imo, me I'm buying the btc to switch into better currencies
  18. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: bah politics, no need to worry BTC is a honeypot anyway
  19. fishladder @ fishladder: down since trump
  20. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: btc has been hovering around 90k for a year everyone is freaking out tbh I am laughing
Back
Top