Some helpful links for members

Gulp2788

Gulp2788

Member
RUBY SPONSOR
Joined
Nov 15, 2024
Messages
99
Hey all, I just wanted to start a thread regarding links for information regarding research and magazines, maybe just a general purpose link thread (NOT FOR SOURCING DO NOT POST ANY SOURCES HERE) I would like to increase my bookmarks tab when I look for research perhaps we can help everyone out. I would love to post some onion links but I need to make sure that's okay with staff of DBG before I do, none of what I post would have anything to do with sourcing, more like indexes.

RC.community - A fantastic first line resource I use often for beginning my search when thinking of experiments I can conduct on reagents. Website has built in privacy features as well for those researchers concerned with OPSEC
harm reduction lab - A directory linking you to free services to send research for GC/MS testing
A free GC/MS analysis lab - Run by a university, fantastic service allows you to search your area and determine what contaminates may be in local drugs

Would love more links in this vein I want INFORMATION, my brain must eat!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBL
That RC.community website looks cool but not so sure about the data or where it comes from. For example it says 25–75 mg is a "light" dose of SR-14968 and I do not think that is the case. 5mg might be a light dose. I believe it's 10x as strong as SR-17 and no one is taking 750mg doses of SR-17 and calling them light.
 
I agree, they do post their sources however I think sometimes the information can be misleading, I use it only as a starting point usually. I don't know how they aggregate their data but I like the indexing.
 
Im pretty sure a lot of it is anecdotal experiences posted on reddit (which, lol. Take with a grain of salt obviously). They list sources on some of their posts and I've seen reddit as a source more often than not. Still a great tool nonetheless. I hope they expand it more.
 
Another link for your enjoyment, it is an AI chatbot for ɦǟʀʍ ʀɛɖʊƈȶɨօռ IDK how useful it is for most people but I played around with it and it seems like it is better than trying to use any of the mainstream AI tools: https://psyai.chat/
 
username7F8 said:
That RC.community website looks cool but not so sure about the data or where it comes from. For example it says 25–75 mg is a "light" dose of SR-14968 and I do not think that is the case. 5mg might be a light dose. I believe it's 10x as strong as SR-17 and no one is taking 750mg doses of SR-17 and calling them light.
Click to expand...
Yeah the page count section(thresh-heavy if that’s unclear) is very hit or miss and could very much so include dangerous information for people that put blind faith into a single website. In recent months I stumbled across a collection of obscure or rare books, and while I spent a long time looking into some of them I gave up on any hope of actually holding them in my hands long ago. So my memory on how many pages to read was foggy, shit, my memory’s always foggy. But I’d recently discovered that community page and was digging it, until I looked up a specific name and saw a number that immediately raised question as I’d looked this name up on a syco w¡ki days before and remember seeing a very conflicting answer.

Which lead to a rabbit hole of cross-referencing a lot of titles that I either personally knew page count of or knew the w¡ki to be accurate of and the results were pretty mixed. I’ve been looking into it semi often and some of them have update to better numbers, some haven’t.

Always cross reference multiple sites as well as book(experience) reports until you’re confident you have a number that is at the very least agreed on between a few individuals that still have a pulse. Preferably a criteria with higher standards, but sometimes that’s the best you can find.
 
LW815 said:
Yeah the page count section(thresh-heavy if that’s unclear) is very hit or miss and could very much so include dangerous information for people that put blind faith into a single website. In recent months I stumbled across a collection of obscure or rare books, and while I spent a long time looking into some of them I gave up on any hope of actually holding them in my hands long ago. So my memory on how many pages to read was foggy, shit, my memory’s always foggy. But I’d recently discovered that community page and was digging it, until I looked up a specific name and saw a number that immediately raised question as I’d looked this name up on a syco w¡ki days before and remember seeing a very conflicting answer.

Which lead to a rabbit hole of cross-referencing a lot of titles that I either personally knew page count of or knew the w¡ki to be accurate of and the results were pretty mixed. I’ve been looking into it semi often and some of them have update to better numbers, some haven’t.

Always cross reference multiple sites as well as book(experience) reports until you’re confident you have a number that is at the very least agreed on between a few individuals that still have a pulse. Preferably a criteria with higher standards, but sometimes that’s the best you can find.
Click to expand...
Wonderful reply, I agree I think that the website as I put it is probably only at best a first line reference. Never take anything at face value alone, I have commented to the poster of the site where I found this about some of the issues within the site that they should take up with the owner. Hopefully the developer makes updates to that site to make it so that it can be utilized more safely. Always cross-reference your research, it isn't good to rely on one website alone to provide you with the answers you need. This is true for life as well as the environment we work within.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: whereas if I use fiat to buy something the money is green anyway. Monero does this really well. Anyway rant over, you can DM me if you'd like to talk more about cryptos.
  2. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: I don't really think that people understand the whole point of cryptos in the first place anymore. BTC just won't be adopted by governments because the transactions are too public and what's worse, money that is freshly minted is better than money that has been used. Like if my btc was used for something that was illegal does that mean the money is "poisoned"?
  3. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @xenxra Yeah, Like I said I've never really been that fond of btc, it isn't used as a currency, just as a place for people to invest money in, even though the whole purpose of btc was to be a currency. If it doesn't fulfill that role, what does? Monero certainly does.
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: What's good guys! Just got back home. Missing football today :( Fuck the probowl lol
  5. shoutback @ shoutback: Volkanovski is the greatest featherweight of all time. Better than Aldo or Holloway at their peaks.
  6. S @ sawganaut: I bet btc bottom is in
  7. D @ dragnetopher: No, I don’t think it. I know it. And it’s not just bitcoin, it’s all crypto. And like I said, they’re selling to acquire liquidity for when countries truly start utilizing what’s been set in place. The USD is under controlled demolition as we speak. This is all part of it.
  8. xenxra @ xenxra: there is no shortage of whales - https://tikolu.net/i/fmnru.png
  9. xenxra @ xenxra: tokenisation is not a plan its already been happening for months, ive been trading this whole move on silver through ethereum
  10. xenxra @ xenxra: you think whales are dumping bitcoin because of something everyone has known about for like 4 years? what does bitcoin liquidity have to do with trading tokenized assets? they don't have pooled liquidity.
  11. D @ dragnetopher: Whales are tanking BTC due to the fact that the future is coming now, literally. There’s a plan to tokenize every single asset possible. This is whales dumping so they can have liquidity for the Springtime.
  12. xenxra @ xenxra: @Gulp2788 this is a terrible spot to buy bitcoin haphazardly because it's going down another $5k -$7k if 80,000 doesn't hold. i told everyone to get the fuck out of bitcoin at $103k. it's better to buy late when the bottom is more certain than throw darts and act like the opposite outcome was unavoidable just because it went down "a lot" and everyone seems to be "freaking out". wait for it to get back over 85k
  13. xenxra @ xenxra: @aarons the last time i said monero was on discount in here it went up 5x in 3 months
  14. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: good opportunity to buy more btc if you are gonna do so imo, me I'm buying the btc to switch into better currencies
  15. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: bah politics, no need to worry BTC is a honeypot anyway
  16. fishladder @ fishladder: down since trump
  17. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: btc has been hovering around 90k for a year everyone is freaking out tbh I am laughing
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: Wow wasn't btc just at 120K or something?
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: Also 1.Usyk 2.Inoue 3.Crawford top 3 and anyone thinks anything else they are crazy
  20. shoutback @ shoutback: So what? No fight fans here?
Back
Top