ArtemisLab

ciik said:
My friend said no books arrived over the weekend. The last time the publisher replied was over a week ago. No tracking given, no verification that the order was received.
Click to expand...
UPDATE: the publisher replied via email 2 days ago. He said he didnt open the temp links in time. He provided no tracking, no update on order, no reason for the long delay. My friend ordered 3 weeks ago. Still no books have been delivered.
 
RedMan39 said:
What I mean to say is I’m pessimistic by nature, who’s knows my mags could be in transit for all I know. I just get that nature out of me using first time vendors when I’m used to something totally different, which is updates and confirmations and the works.
Click to expand...
No. It’s called opsec. Plausible deniability. Be patient.
 
pyro396 said:
No. It’s called opsec. Plausible deniability. Be patient.
Click to expand...
not sure how one got deleted but other didn’t way back. Interesting. Sorry @Admin, just going off another’s post.
@pyro396 call whatever you want brother, it’s all plausible. I am being patient. I’m not blowing up. Maybe once a day(with confirmation I’d be silent) so You got your version of trust and I’ve got mine. It’s earned by display. Easy for you to say I think. I don’t just trust that someone’s ‘opsec’ isn’t just a missed subscription by accident or what have you. We not outchea deaddropping magazines to familiar people we’ve dealt with before. I’ve honestly forgotten what I wrote originally and it’s been deleted, but I’ll just say this: ONE reply stating something innocuous that’s doesn’t compromise your opsec is not an unreasonable desire.
 
RedMan39 said:
not sure how one got deleted but other didn’t way back. Interesting. Sorry @Admin, just going off another’s post.
@pyro396 call whatever you want brother, it’s all plausible. I am being patient. I’m not blowing up. Maybe once a day(with confirmation I’d be silent) so You got your version of trust and I’ve got mine. It’s earned by display. Easy for you to say I think. I don’t just trust that someone’s ‘opsec’ isn’t just a missed subscription by accident or what have you. We not outchea deaddropping magazines to familiar people we’ve dealt with before. I’ve honestly forgotten what I wrote originally and it’s been deleted, but I’ll just say this: ONE reply stating something innocuous that’s doesn’t compromise your opsec is not an unreasonable desire.
Click to expand...
It’s just best practice, nothing personal. Take a few breaths, if it doesn’t show in three weeks contact the vendor( most at every understanding unless you display a certain pattern of behavior. If nothing changes contact the mods. I really think a few
Big deep breaths would do you some good. I don’t think you’re coming at me except for that backhanded “it’s easy for you to say”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Leggo Minter baby!
  2. Gracie5 @ Gracie5: All the answers and more discussion about the types of boxes is accessible with Search. Mostly you can find this under Shipping and Tracking. When you search mailboxes you find numerous entries.
  3. Bodix @ Bodix: But this was a few years ago
  4. R @ RedMan39: I almost feel bad for Josh Allen he’s just getting older I can’t believe they fired mcdermot
  5. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  6. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: no doubt
  12. Thoth @ Thoth: Josh Allen will be 1st Ballot HOF
  13. D @ drdrizzy13: word I wanted Josh Allen to win a Superbowl. They've been so close for a few years now. Josh Allen messed up last game.
  14. R @ RedMan39: Agreed sucks the bills didn’t make it
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think pats vs hawks superbowl
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: saying that as a rams fan
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: The rams are definitely good but I don’t believe they are seahawk level good
  18. L @ Layne_Cobain: Especially sucks the bills didn’t pull it off now since Nix is out and even with that Denver defense predict pats have an easy route to Super Bowl now…pats rams or pats hawks rematch? Perhaps
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: The Hawks look STRONG
  20. R @ RedMan39: Yeah my teams not in it (as usual) so just hoping for good games not blowouts lol
Back
Top