“tardy” publishers

drjimmy1964

Member
EMERALD SPONSOR
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
666
I hope this is ok to ask here in this forum , it’s related to Shi/Track but more about the publishers we all work with.

If a publisher takes our donation from us for Oh-$N and not 48, and they don’t get to the 3 or 4 Letter starting nest on time because they are lazy or decided not to go and then use the “oh we tried as best as we could but 5 L had internal issues so it will flap tomorrow and now you get to read in two instead of tomorrow” but they for some reason won’t leave mags there ( made up excuse )

Should there be some unwritten rule that we either get a perk or something to refund the ones that donate for what is offered - to be able to read the mag in 24 not 48 ?

So many times I’ve been told “catch you tonight after stork takes and will alert you to your tea-an info”. And there is radio silence from publisher and there is no appearance of info when refreshing stork radar - so my mag is now taking the slower train.

And publishing takes donations and pockets it. My inquiries about getting Oh An that I paid for and not 48 are met with same “out of our hands- we tried our best but 3 or 4 latter (depending on what they use ) was down. We paid for it to fly last night”

Clearly they are avoiding the topic - Yes you donated for 0h An but that sticker will work tomorrow- so just because it’s Oh An tomorrow, it’s now a two (48) wait for me.

And publisher still pockets the extra $ meant for 1 not 2 d@ze service
 
In a perfect world, sure. That would be great and give confidence to readers and hold publishers to a high standard. However, in words often repeated that I, personally, attribute to the Great Stone Bear(s), “This ain’t ᏌmᏍzᎤn.” I think it also makes those who truly go above and beyond for their subscribers by honoring their commitments and voluntarily compensating for any shortcomings to truly stand above those who don’t. I’ve only been around here a very short while, but during that time and by going through some of the historical threads, it’s clear that there are some publishers who truly are elite and base their entire purpose on the satisfaction of their readers. I’’ve thoroughly researched and been very selective about to whom I’ve subscribed, and I’ve been astounded by the level of service I’ve received. I think this unwritten rule of which you speak already exists. It’s called honor, and those who abide by it have a reputation to show for it. @Pharma Daddy, @Stims King, @autogen99, @iamgroot @giantsquids @CalFresh are but a few that are truly in a class all their own and hold their commitment to service and professionalism as sacred.
 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. cannedgoods @ cannedgoods: Hope yall have a great weekend with all your research! Cheers!
  2. proton369 @ proton369: Happy researching friends!
  3. L @ livefcklove: What up yall sending good vibes
  4. aarons @ aarons: Goood day!!
  5. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: @shoutback my man <3
  6. shoutback @ shoutback: I hear that @tiquanunderwood
  7. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: and my team didn't even make it this year! honestly maybe that's why I'm enjoying it more. Stress free babyyyy. I just roll with friends.teams.
  8. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: best playoff weekend i can remember since i started watching football in 2006.\
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: I'm just vibing... am I crazy or has this been the best football playoff season? Both pro and college have been rocking this post season.
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: Not trying to offend. Just think it's funny
  11. shoutback @ shoutback: The name of this site is just so on the nose, wacky stuff.
  12. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: Hey @Admin im sorry for posting magazine names in shoutbox, i just saw @Gracie5 message to me. Wont happen again 💯 edited my shoutbox post
  13. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: Started a thread about some very new benz magazines popping up in different dark places
  14. G @ globby: Lets hope Rodgers is chatting it up with the docs already.
  15. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: I know a lot about pharmacology, but there's so many that know more.
  16. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: If anyone feels like critiquing my work the thread is in the discuss RC thread.
  17. MAFTEESKI @ MAFTEESKI: 🐻⬇️
  18. L @ Layne_Cobain: It was pretty intense @Dr-Octagon
  19. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: Cla-doodles,..am i right?!!
  20. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: You guys catch that wicked game of cranium?
Back
Top