Asking about sites/emails?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trinitygirl4
  • Start date Start date
T

Trinitygirl4

Guest
Hello,

I am new here and have read through the forum rules and I'm not sure if this would be in violation of rule #8 - but how do we ask about an email or website to see if it's trusted source? Seems legit enough but afraid to take the plunge in case it's not.  I have been all over the site and have not seen mention of these sources so I'm not sure how to ask without getting in trouble or violating the rules.  I definitely do not want to violate the rules!  I don't see an SY (still don't know what that means) section or somewhere to look at the current vendors other than the few I see in the banner.  Some help and guidance with this would be appreciated!  Thank you!!

 
Hi @Trinitygirl4, all vendors listed that you can see just now, are vetted and reliable! Good to go! A small donation will give you access to email vendor section and Mexican section, where vendors are also all vetted, reliable and good to go(generally) the reviews left give you an idea of how they are doing. Avoid any vendor on the blacklist of course, and if we don't have a vendor/source listed, they are not approved and I would exercise caution in dealing with them. We have many approved reliable vendors here. Hope this helps!

 
Thank you GP!!! I think I'm finally getting the hang of this. I did try to make a donation yesterday but having issues with PayPal.  Will get it straightened out.. I have been hacked 4 times because of my other full time job - education activism/advocating.. Hit a few nerves with my blog.. Wish I could hook up with a programmer or "hacker".. HA HA!

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. shoutback @ shoutback: Coach will get Woolen straightened out.
  2. shoutback @ shoutback: Yessir but I think he may have matured and he is showing steadiness during crunch time. All you can ask of anyone. He has answered the call so far.
  3. M @ meepmoopmeep: Darnold sometimes does Darnold things but otherwise a skilled QB
  4. M @ meepmoopmeep: @shoutback he seriously needs to be benched for being a jackass who almost cost the seahawks the game
  5. shoutback @ shoutback: @meepmoopmeep that Woolen situation was atrocious
  6. shoutback @ shoutback: 2018 draft
  7. shoutback @ shoutback: At least football is something we all can agree on. I'm happy for Darnold. Crazy to think he is the 1st of that 2018 to make it to the SB
  8. shoutback @ shoutback: Squack Squack mfers lol j/k but yeah go fucking Seahawks!
  9. M @ meepmoopmeep: sad that the rams aren’t advancing but saw it coming from a mile away. go seahawks!
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: GO HAWKS!
  11. L @ Layne_Cobain: Stidham played well enuff to win until that late pick that ended it ;( hate the pats hope Sammy and the Seahawks can handle em that defense is fierce but the offense isn’t as explosive as the rams and obviously he ain’t the caliber of Matthew stafford but anyways, go Hawks!!!
  12. M @ meepmoopmeep: But the hawks played better and earned their SB spot
  13. M @ meepmoopmeep: Riq Woolen being an absolute clown and handing the rams a TD for unsportsmanlike behavior at the sidelines
  14. shoutback @ shoutback: What about them HAWKS!
  15. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Come on Stidham!
  16. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Now that's interesting...
  17. L @ Layne_Cobain: McCarthy to the yinzers
  18. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: *offensive line
  19. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: I'm very happy with it. He was in our building for a few years, followed Mike MacDonald path and let's fucking do it! Pass rush has been our biggest issue besides online.
  20. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: He's basically a younger harbaugh lol
Back
Top