Benz0 that doesn’t fail a UA?

EffectiveNow

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2025
Messages
4
swim has taken Klonopin in the past and never popped positive on a UA(DroogScreen) , so I’m wondering if there are any other Benz0s that won’t pop hot on a UA ???
 
Thienobenzodiazepines are your friends. Etizolam, deschloro-etizolam, clotizolam, metizolam, those are not gonna pop positive, but I believe most of the more complicated benzos, like the ones that have the triazolo ring (alprazolam, clonazolam, flualprazolam, nitrazolam) shouldn't pop positive either.
 
Thienobenzodiazepines are your friends. Etizolam, deschloro-etizolam, clotizolam, metizolam, those are not gonna pop positive, but I believe most of the more complicated benzos, like the ones that have the triazolo ring (alprazolam, clonazolam, flualprazolam, nitrazolam) shouldn't pop positive either.
sorry, thienodiazepìnes
 
Yup exactly but it's always a roll of the dice really, sometimes these RCs have metavolites that we dont know of and u never know. I wouldn't risk it if on probation. Rivos are quite good themselves.
 
All I can say for certain is 3mg or more a day of flubr0m@z0I@m would pop the instant, but when it got sent to the lab, after disputing it, it would come back as having been a false positive(negative). Over and over lol. Scratching their heads hard.
Taking under 3 mg daily made it so the instant cup wouldn’t pop though

That has to do with antibiodies(what instant cups are looking for)
And metabolites (what the gc ms piss labs are looking for)

It takes some research but you want to choose some b3nzies to look into what they put off as antibodies, and what they put off as metabolites. Then you want to research what antibodies the instant (called immunoassay) cups are looking for, and what metabolites the labs will be looking for.

Typically cl0nazep@m doesn’t pop those instant tests unless you’re taking a lot becuase of similar reasons to the flubr0. Something to do with antibodies. I remember also that it does NOT metabolize into 0x@zep@m, which is the primary, (but I don’t think the only) metabolite looked for under gcms lab tests. I’m also 10 years rusty on this subject so no doubt some things have adapted or changed. Maybe, idk

Good luck
And don’t forget about simply diluting, keeping color up, and keeping creatinine levels high. Beef jerkey is good for that. B12 is good for color but it gets a bit neon
 
Anybody can vouch for some of the posits listed here? Heard about et1z having good/negative results depending on how you look at it. Lol.

Would appreciate it
 
Thienobenzodiazepines are your friends. Etizolam, deschloro-etizolam, clotizolam, metizolam, those are not gonna pop positive, but I believe most of the more complicated benzos, like the ones that have the triazolo ring (alprazolam, clonazolam, flualprazolam, nitrazolam) shouldn't pop positive either.
Etizolam definitely fails UA (in the US at least). LabCorp added it to their standard benzo immunoassay panel shortly after it was scheduled.
 
Thienobenzodiazepines are your friends. Etizolam, deschloro-etizolam, clotizolam, metizolam, those are not gonna pop positive, but I believe most of the more complicated benzos, like the ones that have the triazolo ring (alprazolam, clonazolam, flualprazolam, nitrazolam) shouldn't pop positive either.
I have had almost
All these pop are you sure?
 
I take a pretty hefty amount of bromonor daily, and it hasn't popped my Suboxone clinic tests. Now, I'm honest that I take it, but yeah the second visit after the first UA she was perplexed it didn't pop up for any Valium metabolites. Overall, it was negative for b3nzos. Well technically it isn't one, its of nordiazepam, which is a metabolite of Valium, and I know they test for that.

DONT TAKE THIS AS A YES. It's a no until I get eyes on my UA next week.And I'm glad it's bromonor I'm potentially recommending because it's safety profile compared to say phen@zol@m is night and day.

I'll ask to look at my UAs on the computer next week when I go in to confirm if and why this is the case. It doesn't check out.
 
Last edited:
There is no way to answer this question without knowing about the test. If you want a definitive answer, you need to find out as much about the particular test you're gonna take as you can. Beyond the type of test, it's about economics: the lower the cutoff, the more expensive it becomes. I will tell you a story:

Ihave an addiction history (though MANY years ago at this point), and when I finally clawed my way out of the program I was in and managed to get back to my original psychiatrist, he made a deal with me: "You stay clean, I will forget any of this ever happened. I don't prescribe controlled substances to addicts. We start fresh, and the choice is yours. Or you can try your luck with some other psychiatrist hahahahaa."

Yes, he was laughing. See, he knew that there was precisely NO ONE else who was gonna prescribe an MAOI with 60mg/day of Dex3drine (yes, this is a thing even tho everyone seems to think it makes you stroke out) who I even could see with my insurance who would touch that with a 10-foot pole, that was an offer I couldn't refuse. So I agreed. And he said "Somehow I knew you'd see it my way."

Now, here is my point: in order to demonstrate that I was compliant, he tested me more than I have ever been drug tested before. I was in a program where they did tests, but he wasn't interested in those tests. Oh, no. He knew me better than that lol. He said, "Now the deal is that anytime I call you up and tell you I want a urine, you WILL come and give me a urine. I don't care if you pass the program's tests. You're gonna pass MY tests lol. And I am gonna keep testing you until I am satisfied." See, he was a psychopharmacology professor. He used the hospital system's lab to the max. He showed me how he ordered it. With drug tests, they can test for just about anything. It just costs more. Same with the cutoff. I am absolutely positive that if I had taken ANY benzo at that time, it would have popped. He was prescribing me lor4z3pam at the time for sleep, and the tests he was giving me could tell the difference, im pretty sure.


He actually did me a massive favor by doing this. I never ended up addicted to anything again after MONTHS of that. I still use some drugs now and then, but it put this permanent fear in me lol.

You get what I'm trying to say?
 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. T @ Tonka18: Anyones mags being taken/lost in mail?
  2. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  3. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  4. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  5. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  6. iBlessi @ iBlessi: What kind of P.O. Box should I get to keep my wife from opening a pack?
  7. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  8. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
  9. D @ drdrizzy13: no doubt
  10. Thoth @ Thoth: Josh Allen will be 1st Ballot HOF
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: word I wanted Josh Allen to win a Superbowl. They've been so close for a few years now. Josh Allen messed up last game.
  12. R @ RedMan39: Agreed sucks the bills didn’t make it
  13. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think pats vs hawks superbowl
  14. M @ meepmoopmeep: saying that as a rams fan
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: The rams are definitely good but I don’t believe they are seahawk level good
  16. L @ Layne_Cobain: Especially sucks the bills didn’t pull it off now since Nix is out and even with that Denver defense predict pats have an easy route to Super Bowl now…pats rams or pats hawks rematch? Perhaps
  17. shoutback @ shoutback: The Hawks look STRONG
  18. R @ RedMan39: Yeah my teams not in it (as usual) so just hoping for good games not blowouts lol
  19. M @ meepmoopmeep: Still a better game than the 49ers vs Seahawks, that one was so lopsided it made me feel bad
  20. R @ RedMan39: @shoutback it was a good one!
Back
Top