DBG and Tapatalk

scottsi69

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
208
Hello fellow members,

Up until about a month ago I was able to access DBG via the tapatalk app but it seems as that DBG is no longer accessible via this method. Now tapatalk seemed to work quite well but since it stopped working out appears that the web version of Dbg takes a very very long time to browse through each thread. I tend to think that it's not just me but a system wide issue where the site has come down to a crawl. Is anyone else noticing things and if so, does anyone know why our if there is a workaround around this? 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You

 
Hi Scott. I was also an avid TapTalk follower and was initially sad to see it go. I think the forum is moving much quicker now (for me at least) and can tell a huge improvement just over the last 12 hours. I know TapTalk works great for our Members who ultizize the forum with a phone only. Not sure how the new site is working for them at this point without having the benefit of Tap Talk. Are you strictly using a mobile device? I use my IPad 99.9 % of the time and I can say my iPad is doing much better on the new format and I don't seem to miss TT as much  

Dont know if that helped you at all. Personally, I would like to see the TapTalk option return---when I am on my iPhone i can slip in and catch up. Either way, the forum sees to be improving daily so hang on and be patient. And who know? TapTalk might be the next undergoing for this forum once all the final kinds have been worked out. I hope so. And if it isn't well- the only thing in life that is guaranteed is change.  Thx Admin for putting lost so thought and man hours to update the site. Maybe Vat van let us know th future of TapTalk. Not sure she knows but if she does I'm sure she will let us know. 

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. M @ meepmoopmeep: Wasn’t fun watching Oregon get curb stomped in the first half but Indiana deserved the win more
  2. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think Indiana is going to win the natty
  3. D @ drdrizzy13: wow Indiana looking really really good.
  4. L @ Layne_Cobain: I seriously hope our guy @tiquanunderwood didn’t take a header after that Steelers ravens game and harbaughs firing jr ain’t worth it tiquan sports drive all of us equally mad at times hope you’re chillin 😎
  5. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: I’m salty myself, being an Ohio state fan, but Miami is winning by the smallest margin. Indiana going to be hard to beat
  6. M @ meepmoopmeep: I’m salty about the SEC being eliminated but good for Miami. it was a well fought game by both teams
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: Imagine being a 10 seed barely squeaking into the playoffs becoming a cinderella team
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think they can beat Oregon, but Indiana is too good
  9. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Who thinks Miami stands a chance vs either team (Oregon or Indiana) my bet is Indiana but you never know
  10. S @ sporidicus: delete this though, if it's the wrong place
  11. S @ sporidicus: sorry I don't think I know what this is for. but It's the #4 edition
  12. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: @sporidicus reddit maybe? What mag?
  13. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: Anyone heard of ethyl midazolam, cyclopropyl midazolam or ethyl flualprazolam?
  14. D @ dhertz9192@gm: Delete
  15. Thoth @ Thoth: @sporidicus honestly depends on the mag. Read read read read the forum
  16. Thoth @ Thoth: CFP needs more of an NBA or MLB playoff structure but that would be hard to structure. Divisions inside Leagues
  17. S @ sporidicus: or is there a better place on the forum to ask
  18. S @ sporidicus: can anyone help me with a chemistry problem? someone purposefully poured powdered sugar into my mag, i need to see if i can clean it off. any chemists here?
  19. M @ meepmoopmeep: agreed
  20. D @ drdrizzy13: Yea it will be tough but I think they might just have enough. I guess we will see what tomorrrow night?
Back
Top