Dont confuse MXPr with MXP

[EmeraldAlchemist]

MXP < MXPr as a substitute for MXE.     

How are they related structurally?

At this moment there is a scarce amount of information available about these compounds.  Ive noticed a handful of people that have confused MXP for an arylcyclohexylamine as well as an analog of MXE. 

MXP, Methoxydiphenidine,

(2-Methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylethyl]piperidine

SHOULD BE CALLED: 2-MeO-Diphenidine.  I shall refer to it as 2-MeO-DPD from now on. Falls into the Piperidine dissociative class, while chemically classified as Diarylethylamine. 2-MeO-DPD is a structural analog of Diphenidine NOT Methoxetamine 

MXPr, Methoxpropamine,

2-(propylamino)-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexanone

ALSO KNOWN AS: 3-MeO-2'-oxo-PCPr 
A dissociative Arylcyclohexylamine recently put on the market for chemical research. At this time there is little to no information regarding the exact pharmacological profile, binding affinity, physical/psychological effects, dosage, duration, or specific method of action. Comparatively speaking it is most similar to MXE and 3-MeO-PCP. 

MXE, Methoxetamine,

 (3-Methoxyphenyl)-2-(ethylamino)cyclohexanone

ALSO KNOWN AS: 3-MeO-2'-oxo-PCE

Dissociative arylcyclohexylamine derived from PCE(eticyclidine) which could be considered a β-Keto-derivative of 3-Methoxyeticyclidine (3-MeO-PCE) and the N-ethyl homologue of Methoxmetamine (MXM) 

I find this relatively confusing to be honest as molecularly it looks more like 3-MeO-PCE than MXE yet the name implys a propyl analog of MXE. 

Would be grateful to hear your thoughts.

 

[porkandbeansboy]

Interesting and confusing those two would indeed end up skewing up the Test Results to a huge degree. You always need to be careful to fully Read the Chemical and type/write it down and put it in Storage somewhere. That way you can just look at the Full and "short V3rs10n" of the N@m3 at least that's my advice on this specific Subject.