GC/MS Testing

CAHEpiphany

CAHEpiphany

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2020
Messages
281
Anyone sent their research into a lab authorized to perform GC/MS on their RCs? Like drugsdata? I'm thinking about doing it for a recent Chinese order. Wondering if anyone else has done this with certain verified Chinese vendors to validate their "99% purity" claim on a batch of tiz. 

Figured I'd ask before spending a benjamin for testing!

 
I havent personally sent items, but i definitely know people (irl and online) who have.  Used to be a great RC vendor (wish they all would!) who would always tell people what code he would use b4 sending and then send it off to drugsdata so the results could be confirmed (or occasionally not confirmed and he wouldnt sell it).  There are a few members here who have posted results since ive been around.  Really wish it was cheaper as id be getting a LOT of things tested!!  If you do decide to get it tested, lmk what code if you could prior to sending.  And def post a link to results!

 
@DoomKitty if I do decide to do it, I'll definitely post the result! I need to do some searching for those past posts on here on the subject... I didn't see anything by searching. If you stumble across any, mind shooting a PM my way with the links? I'll be doing more comprehensive searches in the forum too.

ALL rc vendors should do this... Especially if their source could be considered sketchy.

 
This is great, thanks for finding that! Definite trust for that vendor based on the result. I'm still very skeptical on my own pack... It would definitely give me peace of mind. 

 
Just so you know drugs data cant legally tell you anything related to "quality" so they cant confirm the (imo BS) claim of 99%.  They can only tell you what active substances are in the powder.  So no fillers either.

 
I too question the purity claim, but also want to make sure if it's tiz or dc-tiz, as I've read a few unverified reports of similar vendors making that substitution without disclosure. 

 
When I've spot-checked the purity of chemicals from China, I've always been pleasantly surprised.  Not sure who you're dealing with over there, and things may change towards the sketchier end of the spectrum, but Iwanted to offer the additional data points.  If you're thinking that the purity is in the right ballpark, but short of 99% (say, something like 95%), I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.  Different story if you think that the true purity is like 50%.  I've generally found that good Chinese chemicals are the best in the world, although bad ones can be absolute garbage (or high-quality, but the wrong stuff).

As an aside, I think you might want LC/MS or even just HPLC instead of GC/MS.  I don't know how stable tiz/dc-tiz is with respect to heat, so lower-temperature protocols might be more appropriate. 

 
This is a good point I hadn't even considered, though I'd be sending into drugsdata which uses GC/MS. They also have reference standards for both etiz and dc-etiz, based on recent tests, so I'd assume gc/ms does the job.

Sure they're not able to give me the purity, far less concerned with that than validating the substance itself. Thanks @vs322 for the food for thought :)

 
@Tylenol thank you so much for having it tested. I need to do some research to see if they are affiliated with this specific vendor (a lot of them are) but if that's confirmed, I will be one happy person!

 
Hey, if these tests (quantitative) are only like $100, I'll heavily subsidize (subject to mu sole discretion) the tests as long as I get a copy of the full data and the vendor info.  I provably wouldn't subsidize 100% for incentive reasons, but I could often be talked into 80-90%.  Unless it's some 'noid, they I just don't care.

Let me know...

(I don't want a bunch of random shady shit showing up at my lab, that's why I'd outsource.)

P.S. my keyboard id messed up.  Please forguve typos. I'm not high ir tripping or anything.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: How about that curling team huh? Give it up
  2. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: Top o tha Marnin
  3. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good morning Guys
  4. T @ Tinyfishnemo: Hope everyone has a good and safe weekend.
  5. T @ tylerderrden: Dunno
  6. S @ soupson: What happened to chem genie?
  7. D @ drdrizzy13: LSU is trash and has always been trash but a night game in death valley is unlike anything I've experienced. Except the first game back to the superdome reopened after Katrina destroyed it. Everybody was crying and drunk as shit lol. All time favorite in person sports moment ever.
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: Kiffin is a traitor and he and LSU deserve each other since they’re both complete trash
  9. D @ drdrizzy13: yea he's a joke lol. Can't stand him.
  10. L @ Layne_Cobain: You know who rly sucks…lane kiffin 😂 dude is all that’s wrong with college sports or at least a big chunk of it…and he lied about being told he could still coach ole miss in the playoffs
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: Hey at least Ole Miss got in. I can't stand LSU. They really sucked this year.
  12. M @ meepmoopmeep: as an A&M fan I’m content with us missing the SECCG for that reason. Georgia about to fuck Alabama up
  13. D @ drdrizzy13: Yeah I agree if bama loses I think they are out. That would be 3 losses. I don't see a 3 loss team getting in this year.
  14. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah that’s why sark was pleading his case about that Texas shouldn’t be punished for scheduling a non conference game against the best team and losing if they hadn’t done that they’d probably be in but oh well way it goes there’s always gonna be a few teams who get robbed or feel they got robbed even with a 12 team playofff…if bama loses to Georgia I’d think they’d be out but who knows
  15. D @ drdrizzy13: Alabama also lost to Florida State pretty bad. Whom Florida beat. I just think if they didn't decide to play ohio state the first game. They would be in with 2 losses instead of Alabama.
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: @drdrizzy13 Texas lost to Florida of all teams, they weren’t heading for the playoffs anyways imo. At least not this year
  17. D @ drdrizzy13: Texas is offically out of the playoffs they didn't make the top 12. I do wish they were in it. They showed up against Texas AM. But there fatal flaw was scheduling Ohio State for their opening. Which would have been great if they won but they are a 3 loss team now.
  18. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah idk about arch I could see him staying with Sark for another year but if he plays rly well in the playoff who knows that is if they get in
  19. D @ drdrizzy13: Man a lot of Saints fan want Arch but I think he said he is playing another year. I would take him probably. But if Texas AM QB comes out or Ohio State's I think you gotta take one if your picking top 2.
  20. L @ Layne_Cobain: Is the qb class supposed to be stacked or thin for draft in April I follow college ball but I can’t think right now I think there’s def at least a few high potential qb declaring
Back
Top