Is 400 Capsules still considered a personal amount?

T

tacogirl

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
28
Hello

I want to order Tramadol, but the current seller i've used will only send

400. I've never received more than 200 at a time. If customs nabbed this,

do you think they'd seize and send s "love letter", or more.

If anyone out there has ordered this amount. Someone told me anything

under 500 is not likely to end up with someone at your door, for schedule

I drug. Thanks

 
I've ordered 5x that amount in the past. Bit it always got through. These are just the risks you have to take. I think 400 would be perhaps the borderline for "personal use". 

 
I had thought it was a "3 month supply" and thus was open to interpretation...but I also read that any amount m i g h t be subject to scrutiny...did u see anything on the DEA website?

 
I am leery of going to a DEA website.  I guess I was born paranoid.  I hate the power that ligislators bequeathed to law enforcement in the name of the "War on Dru9s".  Visiting their websitess seem like a great way to end up with your "wires tapped".  Is there another way to check on legalities without leaving a suspicious trail or hiring an attorney?

To quote Cheech & Chong:  "It's Sgt. Stedanko and the F.B.I. and you're busted!"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
400 will def be seen as pushing it as far as " personal supply " goes in the eyes of the law lol .

i mean u can always give it a go ... bigger amounts of harder things are getting thru customs & all that , every single day .

good luck to u if u go for it & hope they make it thru no dramas !

 
I would also say it's "borderline" on an amount of 400 of any med.

I suppose it all depends what country / district you live in at the end of the day.

T

 
pillpop said:
If its scheduled, there's no "90 day supply" or anything else.

This is a fairy tail and simply does not exist. No prescription and you're fu∞∞ed.
Its as simple as that. 

Just my 0.02$
Click to expand...
This is true in the US however the variable scenarios others have pointed out happens. It's luck pure and simple.

 
PTFC said:
I've ordered 5x that amount in the past. Bit it always got through. These are just the risks you have to take. I think 400 would be perhaps the borderline for "personal use". 
Click to expand...
What's the most you've ordered in a month without arising suspicion?

 
There are times when even 50 pills can get confiscated  and a LL sent. Luck of the draw I guess.  Most vendors sent a maximum of 1000 pills per package

 
i keep my orders 100tabs at a time, i rather take the loss and not a big financial hit if one never came thru, if u got the $ and never had a prob b4 with customs, go for it :)

 
I have ordered diazepam in 3 different orders so it will come in 3 different packages of 100. Is this considered safe for shipping to the usa?

 
I have had a pack of 2,000 Diaz taken and an LL was sent. 

If they want you they will make a controlled delivery. There is no list of names they keep for previous or future use as to tracking mail either, that is a myth. In the last 10yrs ive had 6 'LL. all for various compounds amounts but all  for pills. 4 were one address which probably got a couple hundred through.

I would be sketched if the order forced a signature for it. If it doesn't require a sig and the carrier comes to you requesting one...something is definitely up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
wanted to add that if anything is controlled they can consider even 1 pill not for personal use. that's why you hear about people getting distrib charges for having like 6 vics.

The whole 3 month supply is meant for uncontrolled goods. 

 
Partyboy said:
I have ordered diazepam in 3 different orders so it will come in 3 different packages of 100. Is this considered safe for shipping to the usa?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't worry. worst thing is that it is a loss and you might receive an 'LL. 

I've even had part of a shipment come through and the other part seized. part 1 was seized and parts 2 and 3 came through.

hope this eases your mind.

 
I wouldn't worry about 400 any more than I would worry about 200 or 300. If you're not on some kind of watch list, the worst that is likely to happen is a LL. I believe controlled deliveries are very rare, and usually aren't worth the resources they take to organize unless it's part of a larger ongoing investigation where you're likely already screwed. If you're not a "big fish", and you take the proper precautions, use common sense, etc., you will most likely be fine.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. N @ nickelz34: Ty
  2. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @nickelz34 message the admin or gracie
  3. N @ nickelz34: I am an opal sponsor where do I find the password for the pass protected section ?
  4. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: whereas if I use fiat to buy something the money is green anyway. Monero does this really well. Anyway rant over, you can DM me if you'd like to talk more about cryptos.
  5. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: I don't really think that people understand the whole point of cryptos in the first place anymore. BTC just won't be adopted by governments because the transactions are too public and what's worse, money that is freshly minted is better than money that has been used. Like if my btc was used for something that was illegal does that mean the money is "poisoned"?
  6. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @xenxra Yeah, Like I said I've never really been that fond of btc, it isn't used as a currency, just as a place for people to invest money in, even though the whole purpose of btc was to be a currency. If it doesn't fulfill that role, what does? Monero certainly does.
  7. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: What's good guys! Just got back home. Missing football today :( Fuck the probowl lol
  8. shoutback @ shoutback: Volkanovski is the greatest featherweight of all time. Better than Aldo or Holloway at their peaks.
  9. S @ sawganaut: I bet btc bottom is in
  10. D @ dragnetopher: No, I don’t think it. I know it. And it’s not just bitcoin, it’s all crypto. And like I said, they’re selling to acquire liquidity for when countries truly start utilizing what’s been set in place. The USD is under controlled demolition as we speak. This is all part of it.
  11. xenxra @ xenxra: there is no shortage of whales - https://tikolu.net/i/fmnru.png
  12. xenxra @ xenxra: tokenisation is not a plan its already been happening for months, ive been trading this whole move on silver through ethereum
  13. xenxra @ xenxra: you think whales are dumping bitcoin because of something everyone has known about for like 4 years? what does bitcoin liquidity have to do with trading tokenized assets? they don't have pooled liquidity.
  14. D @ dragnetopher: Whales are tanking BTC due to the fact that the future is coming now, literally. There’s a plan to tokenize every single asset possible. This is whales dumping so they can have liquidity for the Springtime.
  15. xenxra @ xenxra: @Gulp2788 this is a terrible spot to buy bitcoin haphazardly because it's going down another $5k -$7k if 80,000 doesn't hold. i told everyone to get the fuck out of bitcoin at $103k. it's better to buy late when the bottom is more certain than throw darts and act like the opposite outcome was unavoidable just because it went down "a lot" and everyone seems to be "freaking out". wait for it to get back over 85k
  16. xenxra @ xenxra: @aarons the last time i said monero was on discount in here it went up 5x in 3 months
  17. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: good opportunity to buy more btc if you are gonna do so imo, me I'm buying the btc to switch into better currencies
  18. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: bah politics, no need to worry BTC is a honeypot anyway
  19. fishladder @ fishladder: down since trump
  20. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: btc has been hovering around 90k for a year everyone is freaking out tbh I am laughing
Back
Top