New product: 2fdck Analogues

bigjackchen

Member
VENDOR ACCOUNT
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
524
New product:  2fdck   Analogues

Fluorexetamine. CRYSTAL with 8% STIMULANT
IUPAC-Name: 2-(ethylamino)-2-(3-fluorophenyl)cyclohexan-1-one
Molecular Formula: C14H18FNO
Molecular Mass: 235.302 g•mol−1
Other names: 3-F-2'-Oxo-PCE

order link:https://www.theresearchchemsclub.com/fluorexetamine-crystal.html

order  email:admin@theresearchchemsclub.com

IMG_0792.JPG

 
the additive has been reported as a-d2pv, a pyro stim. also, “fluoroxetamine,” being a pce, not a pcm like ket/dck/2f, is probably akin to dmxe. reports still lacking.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@strungoutinheaven  Good to know!!  Def glad its been identified, and will def be staying away from it.  Not a pyro fan or stims-with-dissos fan either really.  Ive only heard one review that seemed very lackluster and made it sound extremely low potency.  Interested to see more reviews come in

 
I got a 1g sample of this in an order from another china vendor.  1st I heard the stim id'd as a-d2pv.  I have tried it and it's an ok stim.  I haven't tried the sample.  not sure I will.

 
Some additional info:

my 1g sample was a very dark brown chunky material.   Very uninviting looking.  reports I've seen about this stuff around the web seem very sketchy.

As far as a-d2pv go: ordered some of this a few months ago.   At the time, not much info on it but read it was molecularly similar to diphenidine (a disso) even though its a stim.   my personal experience, and I'm not a stim guy, is that it was pretty nice.   very euphoric.   the comedown was very smooth perhaps owing to it being diphenidine-like.   However, stuff is very caustic and has a numbing effect on mucous membranes.   Use sparingly.

Not sure how valid that the "8% Stimulant" is a-d2pv is, but it sure is weird a disso would  be advertised as a having a stim in it.   I'd avoid.

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. M @ meepmoopmeep: Wasn’t fun watching Oregon get curb stomped in the first half but Indiana deserved the win more
  2. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think Indiana is going to win the natty
  3. D @ drdrizzy13: wow Indiana looking really really good.
  4. L @ Layne_Cobain: I seriously hope our guy @tiquanunderwood didn’t take a header after that Steelers ravens game and harbaughs firing jr ain’t worth it tiquan sports drive all of us equally mad at times hope you’re chillin 😎
  5. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: I’m salty myself, being an Ohio state fan, but Miami is winning by the smallest margin. Indiana going to be hard to beat
  6. M @ meepmoopmeep: I’m salty about the SEC being eliminated but good for Miami. it was a well fought game by both teams
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: Imagine being a 10 seed barely squeaking into the playoffs becoming a cinderella team
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think they can beat Oregon, but Indiana is too good
  9. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Who thinks Miami stands a chance vs either team (Oregon or Indiana) my bet is Indiana but you never know
  10. S @ sporidicus: delete this though, if it's the wrong place
  11. S @ sporidicus: sorry I don't think I know what this is for. but It's the #4 edition
  12. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: @sporidicus reddit maybe? What mag?
  13. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: Anyone heard of ethyl midazolam, cyclopropyl midazolam or ethyl flualprazolam?
  14. D @ dhertz9192@gm: Delete
  15. Thoth @ Thoth: @sporidicus honestly depends on the mag. Read read read read the forum
  16. Thoth @ Thoth: CFP needs more of an NBA or MLB playoff structure but that would be hard to structure. Divisions inside Leagues
  17. S @ sporidicus: or is there a better place on the forum to ask
  18. S @ sporidicus: can anyone help me with a chemistry problem? someone purposefully poured powdered sugar into my mag, i need to see if i can clean it off. any chemists here?
  19. M @ meepmoopmeep: agreed
  20. D @ drdrizzy13: Yea it will be tough but I think they might just have enough. I guess we will see what tomorrrow night?
Back
Top