Postal Package Profiling, Straight From The Feds!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
Postal inspectors use these criteria to identify packages that might contain drugs.

Package Criteria

* Emits odors of marijuana or or a masking agent (e.g., coffee, perfume, fabric-softener sheets)

* Is heavily taped along seams

* Is poorly prepared for mailing

* Appears to have been re-used

* Has an uneven weight distribution

Label Criteria

* Is handwritten

* Contains misspelled names, streets, or cities

* Originates from a drug source State

* Has been sent from an individual to an individual

* Contains return address ZIP code that does not match accepting post office ZIP code

* Shows a fictitious return address

* Lists sender's and/or receiver's names of common type (e.g., John Smith) that are not connected to either address

Here is the link if you want to read the whole article

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Profil...ges-a018447923
 

 
Postal inspectors use these criteria to identify packages that might contain drugs.

Package Criteria

* Emits odors of marijuana or or a masking agent (e.g., coffee, perfume, fabric-softener sheets)

* Is heavily taped along seams

* Is poorly prepared for mailing

* Appears to have been re-used

* Has an uneven weight distribution

Label Criteria

* Is handwritten

* Contains misspelled names, streets, or cities

* Originates from a drug source State

* Has been sent from an individual to an individual

* Contains return address ZIP code that does not match accepting post office ZIP code

* Shows a fictitious return address

* Lists sender's and/or receiver's names of common type (e.g., John Smith) that are not connected to either address

Here is the link if you want to read the whole article

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Profil...ges-a018447923
Thank you DOlphin. I found this quite informative. Despite it's age I would be willing to bet this is now a widely done thing and not just at the Postal level. Very interesting reading.

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Leggo Minter baby!
  2. Gracie5 @ Gracie5: All the answers and more discussion about the types of boxes is accessible with Search. Mostly you can find this under Shipping and Tracking. When you search mailboxes you find numerous entries.
  3. Bodix @ Bodix: But this was a few years ago
  4. R @ RedMan39: I almost feel bad for Josh Allen he’s just getting older I can’t believe they fired mcdermot
  5. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  6. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: no doubt
  12. Thoth @ Thoth: Josh Allen will be 1st Ballot HOF
  13. D @ drdrizzy13: word I wanted Josh Allen to win a Superbowl. They've been so close for a few years now. Josh Allen messed up last game.
  14. R @ RedMan39: Agreed sucks the bills didn’t make it
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think pats vs hawks superbowl
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: saying that as a rams fan
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: The rams are definitely good but I don’t believe they are seahawk level good
  18. L @ Layne_Cobain: Especially sucks the bills didn’t pull it off now since Nix is out and even with that Denver defense predict pats have an easy route to Super Bowl now…pats rams or pats hawks rematch? Perhaps
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: The Hawks look STRONG
  20. R @ RedMan39: Yeah my teams not in it (as usual) so just hoping for good games not blowouts lol
Back
Top