Postal Package Profiling, Straight From The Feds!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
Postal inspectors use these criteria to identify packages that might contain drugs.

Package Criteria

* Emits odors of marijuana or or a masking agent (e.g., coffee, perfume, fabric-softener sheets)

* Is heavily taped along seams

* Is poorly prepared for mailing

* Appears to have been re-used

* Has an uneven weight distribution

Label Criteria

* Is handwritten

* Contains misspelled names, streets, or cities

* Originates from a drug source State

* Has been sent from an individual to an individual

* Contains return address ZIP code that does not match accepting post office ZIP code

* Shows a fictitious return address

* Lists sender's and/or receiver's names of common type (e.g., John Smith) that are not connected to either address

Here is the link if you want to read the whole article

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Profil...ges-a018447923
 

 
Postal inspectors use these criteria to identify packages that might contain drugs.

Package Criteria

* Emits odors of marijuana or or a masking agent (e.g., coffee, perfume, fabric-softener sheets)

* Is heavily taped along seams

* Is poorly prepared for mailing

* Appears to have been re-used

* Has an uneven weight distribution

Label Criteria

* Is handwritten

* Contains misspelled names, streets, or cities

* Originates from a drug source State

* Has been sent from an individual to an individual

* Contains return address ZIP code that does not match accepting post office ZIP code

* Shows a fictitious return address

* Lists sender's and/or receiver's names of common type (e.g., John Smith) that are not connected to either address

Here is the link if you want to read the whole article

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Profil...ges-a018447923
Thank you DOlphin. I found this quite informative. Despite it's age I would be willing to bet this is now a widely done thing and not just at the Postal level. Very interesting reading.

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. M @ meepmoopmeep: But the hawks played better and earned their SB spot
  2. M @ meepmoopmeep: Riq Woolen being an absolute clown and handing the rams a TD for unsportsmanlike behavior at the sidelines
  3. shoutback @ shoutback: What about them HAWKS!
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Come on Stidham!
  5. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Now that's interesting...
  6. L @ Layne_Cobain: McCarthy to the yinzers
  7. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: *offensive line
  8. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: I'm very happy with it. He was in our building for a few years, followed Mike MacDonald path and let's fucking do it! Pass rush has been our biggest issue besides online.
  9. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: He's basically a younger harbaugh lol
  10. R @ RedMan39: @tiquan- taken your a Jesse minter fan? Think he’ll be bettter than harbaugh??
  11. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Leggo Minter baby!
  12. Gracie5 @ Gracie5: All the answers and more discussion about the types of boxes is accessible with Search. Mostly you can find this under Shipping and Tracking. When you search mailboxes you find numerous entries.
  13. Bodix @ Bodix: But this was a few years ago
  14. R @ RedMan39: I almost feel bad for Josh Allen he’s just getting older I can’t believe they fired mcdermot
  15. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  16. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  18. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  20. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
Back
Top