Question About The Board

M

Maybesomeday

Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
986
Just curious, as I'm a member of another forum (not the same kind), and they have it set up so that certain parts of the forum are not searchable from the outside. It enables us to speak freely without fear of it falling into the wrong hands or prying eyes.

Is this the case for any part of our board?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 
Yes, but only party. The areas that you see "protected board" as you view the forum while you are not signed in, are protected from the random collection and indexing of "the bots". 

If you click these particular areas, you have an error returned to you.

Any area that is not protected, either by being logged in, or having a minimum post count requirement ie. (can be opened and read while not being logged in) is wide open for the engines.

Obviously PMs are completely protected, at least from the engines. I don't wanna go any deeper into this specific area, but there you have that in a general nutshell.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
hooter1 said:
Yes, but only party. The areas that you see "protected board" as you view the forum while you are not signed in, are protected from the random collection and indexing of "the bots". 

If you click these particular areas, you have an error returned to you.

Any area that is not protected, either by being logged in, or having a minimum post count requirement ie. (can be opened and read while not being logged in) is wide open for the engines.

Obviously PMs are completely protected, at least from the engines. I don't wanna go any deeper into this specific area, but there you have that in a general nutshell.
Click to expand...
^^^^^^ and this is exactly why we need to tighten up around here! No more KINGPIN talk people!!

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Tied for 1st in the North! Chicago beat Pitt. Leggooo
  2. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: @Layne_Cobain yeah we look ugly on offense. but hopefully we continue to pull it out. Me too man Go Panthers !
  3. L @ Layne_Cobain: @tiquanunderwood good luck today against gang green buddy…can’t wait for MNF
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Hope everyone enjoys football sunday!
  5. M @ Mammasboi123: Thanks @MGAJB6122. I think for future reference, everyone should get in the habit of using the “report” button found on the bottom left of the top comment in threads like the ones mentioned in order to flag threads like this. I’d imagine it’s easier on @Admin than having to check the shout box every day or so.
  6. M @ MCAJB6122: Along the same lines… https://drugbuyersguide.info/threads/clobromazolam.10083/. It shows up on the first page 4 entries down when you search for this compound
  7. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: I spell (emph`Asis) Pho-en-et-it-ca-ly
  8. Admin @ Admin: Deleted and agree better OPSEC should be practiced.
  9. J @ Jai239: Glad to contribute, more emphasis should be placed on spelling and abbreviations
  10. M @ Mammasboi123: Thanks for pointing that out @Jai238
  11. Mom&PopShop @ Mom&PopShop: I just mentioned something to @Admin as well.
  12. Z @ zdaBa: @Admin @Jai239 has a good point
  13. J @ Jai239: Something should be done about this thread because it’s on first page when looking up compound name
  14. J @ Jai239: https://drugbuyersguide.info/threads/fluoprazolam-new.11677/
  15. J @ Jai239: Any mods online?
  16. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good Morning Everyone
  17. Mom&PopShop @ Mom&PopShop: Ya them Panthers showed the Falcons what was up!!
  18. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: It was ugly, but happy to have the win. @Layne_Cobain
  19. L @ Lokemer: Oh man what happened around here :(
  20. etizoman @ etizoman: @aarons thanks. May he rip. 😥
Back
Top