Risk of tr@m@dol in the mail

Acid_Phreak

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
7
Hi guys. I’m pretty seasoned in this but I wanted to run it by you and see if you think my assessment is accurate. I’m hoping to get some tr@m@dol from SL but I don’t want any trouble from this. The drug is schedule IV in USA, so I don’t see it being as big of a deal as others and I’m probably not willing to order anything on a lower schedule on Clearnet. I already order Indian Armo (from a well known clearnet afinil vendor) with zero concerns about my safety and well being. I believe mod@finil is also schedule IV. The reason I’m more concerned about tr@m is that it is an opioid, and that class of drugs is a boogeyman right now. What is the heat like on tr@m these days? Any cases you know of where someone got popped on ordering a small amount? Thank you!

 
Hi guys. I’m pretty seasoned in this but I wanted to run it by you and see if you think my assessment is accurate. I’m hoping to get some tr@m@dol from SL but I don’t want any trouble from this. The drug is schedule IV in USA, so I don’t see it being as big of a deal as others and I’m probably not willing to order anything on a lower schedule on Clearnet. I already order Indian Armo (from a well known clearnet afinil vendor) with zero concerns about my safety and well being. I believe mod@finil is also schedule IV. The reason I’m more concerned about tr@m is that it is an opioid, and that class of drugs is a boogeyman right now. What is the heat like on tr@m these days? Any cases you know of where someone got popped on ordering a small amount? Thank you!
Read around and you'll find a few, but it's the risk you take. If you read the reviews you'll see the vast majority of gifts get to you.

 
@PTFC thanks for your response. To clarify- I’m not super concerned about losing a gift. Not gonna lost sleep over a LL either. I’m wondering if there are any other cases out there of people being arrested/charged/convicted for receiving this substance (tr@m) in the mail. With Armo- there is only one famous of case of someone going down for personal amounts of that drug and there were other factors in that case that made the wrath of the state worse for the defendant than it would have been normally. It seems to me that schedule IV is not really that big of a deal, but I’m concerned that it will be slightly more of a problem with tr@m because it’s an opioid. I know that when tr@m was scheduled around 2014, people did get scared off. Is there a reason people were scared other than not being willing to take a risk on controlled substance whatsoever? 

 
Apologies for the misunderstanding @Acid_Phreak,it's certainly not something I've heard of,  certainly not in my time here anyway. 

 
The US laws are different to the UK. You could always have it sent in a different name then it was never yours in the first place was it?

 
@trinity thanks for your response. As far as I know it is not a good idea to use a false name when using U$P$. It’s one of the factors that will get your package extra scrutiny because it looks suspicious. I wouldn’t do it with private carriers either. I’m really just curious whether we can find ANY cases of convictions on tramadol in USA post the 2014 scheduling. It’s not the most exciting drug so I don’t think it would be all over the news anyway, just wondering for my peace of mind.

 
@PTFC I’m being a little rambly no problem! Ya, I’m just curious how often a schedule IV or V would get someone into actual legal trouble, like an arrest and conviction, but not sure how we would be able to get good numbers on that as I’m not sure that every criminal case is public record 

 
Hi there @Acid_Phreak 

TBH it's not something i would worry about. LEO have bigger fish to fry..

There trying to stop c0ke, brown, meth and all that 'other' stuff which is Much higher on there list of priorities.

The worst that could happen is a Love letter, but even those are rare for Tr@ms..

Regards,  T.

 
@Toker Thanks man. Ya I guess I shouldn’t worry. However it’s very tempting to add in a couple C2 or C3 on this order (‘specially @dder@ll) and I think I’m going to have to restrain myself so I don’t have a panic attack between the time I order and the time my gift arrives 

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. R @ rhodium: @Swabbindex dm
  2. Swabbindex @ Swabbindex: Anyone best source for G
  3. 1018ei @ 1018ei: anymore canuck vendors out thereee ~^_^?
  4. Swabbindex @ Swabbindex: Best source for GHB or GBL? 😊
  5. R @ Royboy99: @sleepyjoefan, ask him bro. If you are talking about Jax, nice dude and will give it to you straight. :D
  6. S @ sleepyjoefan: what is shipping time like for jack?
  7. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Seahawks going to win this but it would be a great comeback story for the patriots and a monster play for maye and the squad
  8. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good Morning everyone
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: Coach will get Woolen straightened out.
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: Yessir but I think he may have matured and he is showing steadiness during crunch time. All you can ask of anyone. He has answered the call so far.
  11. M @ meepmoopmeep: Darnold sometimes does Darnold things but otherwise a skilled QB
  12. M @ meepmoopmeep: @shoutback he seriously needs to be benched for being a jackass who almost cost the seahawks the game
  13. shoutback @ shoutback: @meepmoopmeep that Woolen situation was atrocious
  14. shoutback @ shoutback: 2018 draft
  15. shoutback @ shoutback: At least football is something we all can agree on. I'm happy for Darnold. Crazy to think he is the 1st of that 2018 to make it to the SB
  16. shoutback @ shoutback: Squack Squack mfers lol j/k but yeah go fucking Seahawks!
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: sad that the rams aren’t advancing but saw it coming from a mile away. go seahawks!
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: GO HAWKS!
  19. L @ Layne_Cobain: Stidham played well enuff to win until that late pick that ended it ;( hate the pats hope Sammy and the Seahawks can handle em that defense is fierce but the offense isn’t as explosive as the rams and obviously he ain’t the caliber of Matthew stafford but anyways, go Hawks!!!
  20. M @ meepmoopmeep: But the hawks played better and earned their SB spot
Back
Top