Seizure letter insanely over estimates the value of the contents.

garyis

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2019
Messages
17
I had a package coming from a research chemical website. Their tracked option requires a signature at the door. My parcel is worth >$75, I wasn't too worried.

The package tracking info stopped updating the moment it hit the sorting center. A month and a half later I'm asleep and someone delivers a letter for me, which my room mate signed for.

Within the letter is a packet with multiple pages. It only claims to acknowledge one analogue.    (A gram of 3-m€o-pea C pea). This put me at ease because it's just one item they are acknowledging, then I read the estimated value of the contents is well over $10,000... I paid <75$ and a good portion of that was tracking.

Here are my concerns. The letter was signed for so now it was acknowledged. The estimated value is preposterous, and I'm afraid they will follow up now that the letter has been delivered. If my room mate is talked to by anyone, he will crack with ease.

Anyone reading this who has had a package seized, please tell me what happened and what was your expirience? I haven't ordered anything for YEARS. This was my first order, so I am inexperienced and nervous. Do seizure letters usually tell you what the package contained? Do they usually list all the items, or just one like mine?

 
Sounds like you got love letter. Do not respond and consider nothing happened. Stay low for a bit before you make another order, or try using different address. Especially you just had 1 g, they will not likely to make further action. LL is used more as a scare tactics since they do not have time/resources to bust people who made an order of a 1g of analogue chemical.

Based on my experiences, there is nothing to worry about. You were just unlucky, move on :)

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. R @ rhodium: @Swabbindex dm
  2. Swabbindex @ Swabbindex: Anyone best source for G
  3. 1018ei @ 1018ei: anymore canuck vendors out thereee ~^_^?
  4. Swabbindex @ Swabbindex: Best source for GHB or GBL? 😊
  5. R @ Royboy99: @sleepyjoefan, ask him bro. If you are talking about Jax, nice dude and will give it to you straight. :D
  6. S @ sleepyjoefan: what is shipping time like for jack?
  7. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Seahawks going to win this but it would be a great comeback story for the patriots and a monster play for maye and the squad
  8. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good Morning everyone
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: Coach will get Woolen straightened out.
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: Yessir but I think he may have matured and he is showing steadiness during crunch time. All you can ask of anyone. He has answered the call so far.
  11. M @ meepmoopmeep: Darnold sometimes does Darnold things but otherwise a skilled QB
  12. M @ meepmoopmeep: @shoutback he seriously needs to be benched for being a jackass who almost cost the seahawks the game
  13. shoutback @ shoutback: @meepmoopmeep that Woolen situation was atrocious
  14. shoutback @ shoutback: 2018 draft
  15. shoutback @ shoutback: At least football is something we all can agree on. I'm happy for Darnold. Crazy to think he is the 1st of that 2018 to make it to the SB
  16. shoutback @ shoutback: Squack Squack mfers lol j/k but yeah go fucking Seahawks!
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: sad that the rams aren’t advancing but saw it coming from a mile away. go seahawks!
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: GO HAWKS!
  19. L @ Layne_Cobain: Stidham played well enuff to win until that late pick that ended it ;( hate the pats hope Sammy and the Seahawks can handle em that defense is fierce but the offense isn’t as explosive as the rams and obviously he ain’t the caliber of Matthew stafford but anyways, go Hawks!!!
  20. M @ meepmoopmeep: But the hawks played better and earned their SB spot
Back
Top