Signing For Package

jc21np

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
208
Recently had a registered package sent.

Asked vendor and was told I'd have to sign for it.

Isn't this a no no?

 
Sometimes you have to sign for the packages based on how the shipper sent it. This is no big deal and alot of people do it daily. 

 
Oh Ok I think I read in the Mex SY section it's not a good idea in that case for whatever reason.

 
Well by signing something, you are taking ownership for the package and/or acknowledging that you ordered it. In the very rare case of a controlled delivery, this is how "they" bust you.

Just keep your orders small and for personal use. People that get busted are usually receiving larger amounts more often. Or are involved in some other illegal activity, trafficking etc. and are being watched.

So just take a look at yourself, what you do, who you involve yourself with, outside of the IOP/SY world. Most personal users who otherwise stay on the right side of the law should have nothing to worry about. But I do think a little paranoia is healthy to have in this game.

 
Agreed Heisenberg.

I go small I just remember reading something in the SY SECTION to return to sender if asked to sign.

 
Ask the vendor maybe he'll send no sig required. I lucked ou a couple of times.

 
About 5 yrs ago, when you could order Hydro and Xanax Bars by just telling a doc on the phone "I HURT" and getting a Money Order to hand over to the Fed Ex man, my G/F answered the door to a Fed Ex man who had a pack with 180 and 180 Hydro and Bars.  Well as soon as she signed and handed over the Money order and closed the door, about 5 sec. later the door busted open and she was arrested ON THE SPOT for drug trafficking.  The case was thrown out EVENTUALLY, BUT "they" can do what ever the want!  That's my lil story about signing for a package.

 
I signed for my package a few days ago at the post office and everything is fine for me

 
If one ordered from a vendor and didn't have to sign the first time, should the be concerned about shit if they have to sign for the next package?

 
It is entirely up tp the shipper if he / she wants a signature. I guess the best way to find out if it is indeed  LE, you could ask the shipper beforehand if you will have to sign for it. That way, if the shipper tells you " No, you do not need to sign :" and then if the carrier ask for you to sigh that should give you an indication that you may want to refuse delivery. Just a thought. By the way, how the hell are you Headbanger? Long time no see huh.

 
Marty, it appears the mail guy just forgot or got lazy the first time.

It's just me but I probably would not ordering anything that needs a signature. Sometimes certain vendors only have what you need so you're kind of stuck. It's up to you man.

 
by vendor that does seem odd but as banger stated the guy my have missed it the first time or there was an alt driver doing that route that day which happens often. Do they send track info and you can watch it as it moves??

 
SURF I think that most IOP's don't offer or have the ability to provide TN's. If I'm wrong fellow members let me know. Usually on domestic shipments only.

 
I won't sign for anything unless it's for the Publishers Clearing House Sweepstakes.

 
NO, I wouldn't sign personally at my home address under any circumstance. There are tons of ways around this problematic issue if seller insists. Easy solutions (not free, but very reasonable), but too tired to list them at present /default_sad.png

 
Any orders in make or gathering information on vendors etc I use a friends computer. Surely then you can claim plausible deniability. If I was asked to sign it would and then leave it by the door unopened that way of they do bust you you can say you don't know the packages origins and didn't order anything then with nothing on your computer you can deny any knowledge.all you've done at the end of the day is signed for something that you didnt order.it could have been delivered to the wrong address of our so you claim. Just put a different name on it

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. N @ nickelz34: Ty
  2. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @nickelz34 message the admin or gracie
  3. N @ nickelz34: I am an opal sponsor where do I find the password for the pass protected section ?
  4. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: whereas if I use fiat to buy something the money is green anyway. Monero does this really well. Anyway rant over, you can DM me if you'd like to talk more about cryptos.
  5. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: I don't really think that people understand the whole point of cryptos in the first place anymore. BTC just won't be adopted by governments because the transactions are too public and what's worse, money that is freshly minted is better than money that has been used. Like if my btc was used for something that was illegal does that mean the money is "poisoned"?
  6. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @xenxra Yeah, Like I said I've never really been that fond of btc, it isn't used as a currency, just as a place for people to invest money in, even though the whole purpose of btc was to be a currency. If it doesn't fulfill that role, what does? Monero certainly does.
  7. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: What's good guys! Just got back home. Missing football today :( Fuck the probowl lol
  8. shoutback @ shoutback: Volkanovski is the greatest featherweight of all time. Better than Aldo or Holloway at their peaks.
  9. S @ sawganaut: I bet btc bottom is in
  10. D @ dragnetopher: No, I don’t think it. I know it. And it’s not just bitcoin, it’s all crypto. And like I said, they’re selling to acquire liquidity for when countries truly start utilizing what’s been set in place. The USD is under controlled demolition as we speak. This is all part of it.
  11. xenxra @ xenxra: there is no shortage of whales - https://tikolu.net/i/fmnru.png
  12. xenxra @ xenxra: tokenisation is not a plan its already been happening for months, ive been trading this whole move on silver through ethereum
  13. xenxra @ xenxra: you think whales are dumping bitcoin because of something everyone has known about for like 4 years? what does bitcoin liquidity have to do with trading tokenized assets? they don't have pooled liquidity.
  14. D @ dragnetopher: Whales are tanking BTC due to the fact that the future is coming now, literally. There’s a plan to tokenize every single asset possible. This is whales dumping so they can have liquidity for the Springtime.
  15. xenxra @ xenxra: @Gulp2788 this is a terrible spot to buy bitcoin haphazardly because it's going down another $5k -$7k if 80,000 doesn't hold. i told everyone to get the fuck out of bitcoin at $103k. it's better to buy late when the bottom is more certain than throw darts and act like the opposite outcome was unavoidable just because it went down "a lot" and everyone seems to be "freaking out". wait for it to get back over 85k
  16. xenxra @ xenxra: @aarons the last time i said monero was on discount in here it went up 5x in 3 months
  17. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: good opportunity to buy more btc if you are gonna do so imo, me I'm buying the btc to switch into better currencies
  18. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: bah politics, no need to worry BTC is a honeypot anyway
  19. fishladder @ fishladder: down since trump
  20. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: btc has been hovering around 90k for a year everyone is freaking out tbh I am laughing
Back
Top