This forum needs to have a talk about OPSEC

Gulp2788

Member
RUBY SPONSOR
Joined
Nov 15, 2024
Messages
63
Yall are freaking nuts posting things so publicly, like I'm not always the best at keeping my stuff secure but holy wow you guys need to STOP just listing things on the clearnet, get your gibber jabber up and encrypt, send public keys PGP and start working on protecting yourself and your connections. This forum is all about trust and information about a community that NEEDS EVERYONE to be up on their opsec. I would encourage everyone who is experiencing someone who isn't using secure commos to drop all subscriptions, zines, and etc no matter how reliable. Chances are someone is watching you. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
 
btw if anyone has any questions about best practices I can help, plz ask me I am ready to give what knowledge I have to all members
 
Any time I see a thread or question with blatant no-nos in plain language, my first thought is *FᎧᎠ* which is probably ridiculous 99% of the time. I just have a hard time believing that people can be so careless or naive, thereby exposing my own naïveté, I suppose. If you were to drop a personal ᎠᎥᏀᎥᎦᎧᏣ masterclass here, I’m sure there would be plenty of interest and input from other knowledgeable folks.
 
btw if anyone has any questions about best practices I can help, plz ask me I am ready to give what knowledge I have to all members

Well asking here is one of my usual no’s but yes I do hav some ?’s. The landscape is changing.
 
Last edited:
They don't care about end users, and vendors can decide if they want to be open on the clear or a little more hidden on the dark. Popo is on every dark web market anyway. Not much difference. What matters is the vendors OPSEC.
 
No, they generally don't care about end users, this much is true however always remember that every link is important when conducting forensics. If you are an end user and being too open in your commo to middlemen then you are creating an opening vector for attack. Assume that there is a little guy with a stethoscope on the pulse of the tube you're using to send information through. Better yet, if anyone is familiar with ham radio operation, realize that most every communication is PUBLIC unless actively scrambled to obfuscate. ANYONE CAN LISTEN, even if authorized users are only allowed to talk. This isn't the best example since there is more to internet protocols than there is within the radio world but it's not terribly different.

The only ways to reduce prying eyes is to ensure that only the intended recipients of messages are able to see what information is being delivered. Think like the Enigma machine during WW2. Only those who have set their machine up to receive the information are capable of translating it and reading it clearly. Obviously, there are those who spend their lives dedicated to cracking these codes however if you make it difficult to crack, it immediately becomes a cost-benefit analysis for those capable of doing so. Chances are, it's not worth it for them no matter how problematic the individual or group may be as it would be easier to simply wait for those individuals to become complacent than to attempt to break a code. If have an autistic level of conforming to these protocols (as you should) than you'll never have problems because by the time anyone capable of breaking these methods can do so, the information they gather likely has zero use to them.

Furthermore most encryption protocols tend to add a layer of "I didn't say that shit" to your message therefore adding plausible deniability in legal matters which is arguably as good as being able to say you weren't involved in anything that those who might seek to do your group harm would claim. I would highly recommend people try out the free coursera course google put out on cybersecurity for more information. if anyone wants tutorials on PGP there are a few good courses on youtube. DM me if you have specific questions I might be able to answer though I would say most of my knowledge is publicly available and you probably don't need me to go into details. I might write up a basic guide though I'm pretty sure I saw one somewhere on the forum already.
 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. D @ drdrizzy13: I think they'll probably win it all.
  2. D @ drdrizzy13: Georgia way too dominate
  3. M @ meepmoopmeep: i think most of us expected it but not how badly it went down
  4. M @ meepmoopmeep: Alabama got SPANKED
  5. L @ Layne_Cobain: Down goes Alabama WOW hahah goodbye playoffs who gets in now instead vandy? I gotta look at rankings now
  6. D @ drdrizzy13: SEC championship game next. This game is kind of boring.
  7. L @ Layne_Cobain: Happy weekend mofos enjoy the football @tiquanunderwood and everyone else
  8. G @ globby: happy Saturday
  9. P @ ponglenis: @Dr-Octagon, hey I remember you from another forum, way back in the day
  10. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: How about that curling team huh? Give it up
  11. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: Top o tha Marnin
  12. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good morning Guys
  13. T @ Tinyfishnemo: Hope everyone has a good and safe weekend.
  14. T @ tylerderrden: Dunno
  15. S @ soupson: What happened to chem genie?
  16. D @ drdrizzy13: LSU is trash and has always been trash but a night game in death valley is unlike anything I've experienced. Except the first game back to the superdome reopened after Katrina destroyed it. Everybody was crying and drunk as shit lol. All time favorite in person sports moment ever.
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: Kiffin is a traitor and he and LSU deserve each other since they’re both complete trash
  18. D @ drdrizzy13: yea he's a joke lol. Can't stand him.
  19. L @ Layne_Cobain: You know who rly sucks…lane kiffin 😂 dude is all that’s wrong with college sports or at least a big chunk of it…and he lied about being told he could still coach ole miss in the playoffs
  20. D @ drdrizzy13: Hey at least Ole Miss got in. I can't stand LSU. They really sucked this year.
Back
Top