This forum needs to have a talk about OPSEC

Gulp2788

Member
RUBY SPONSOR
Joined
Nov 15, 2024
Messages
120
Yall are freaking nuts posting things so publicly, like I'm not always the best at keeping my stuff secure but holy wow you guys need to STOP just listing things on the clearnet, get your gibber jabber up and encrypt, send public keys PGP and start working on protecting yourself and your connections. This forum is all about trust and information about a community that NEEDS EVERYONE to be up on their opsec. I would encourage everyone who is experiencing someone who isn't using secure commos to drop all subscriptions, zines, and etc no matter how reliable. Chances are someone is watching you. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
 
btw if anyone has any questions about best practices I can help, plz ask me I am ready to give what knowledge I have to all members
 
Any time I see a thread or question with blatant no-nos in plain language, my first thought is *FᎧᎠ* which is probably ridiculous 99% of the time. I just have a hard time believing that people can be so careless or naive, thereby exposing my own naïveté, I suppose. If you were to drop a personal ᎠᎥᏀᎥᎦᎧᏣ masterclass here, I’m sure there would be plenty of interest and input from other knowledgeable folks.
 
btw if anyone has any questions about best practices I can help, plz ask me I am ready to give what knowledge I have to all members

Well asking here is one of my usual no’s but yes I do hav some ?’s. The landscape is changing.
 
Last edited:
They don't care about end users, and vendors can decide if they want to be open on the clear or a little more hidden on the dark. Popo is on every dark web market anyway. Not much difference. What matters is the vendors OPSEC.
 
No, they generally don't care about end users, this much is true however always remember that every link is important when conducting forensics. If you are an end user and being too open in your commo to middlemen then you are creating an opening vector for attack. Assume that there is a little guy with a stethoscope on the pulse of the tube you're using to send information through. Better yet, if anyone is familiar with ham radio operation, realize that most every communication is PUBLIC unless actively scrambled to obfuscate. ANYONE CAN LISTEN, even if authorized users are only allowed to talk. This isn't the best example since there is more to internet protocols than there is within the radio world but it's not terribly different.

The only ways to reduce prying eyes is to ensure that only the intended recipients of messages are able to see what information is being delivered. Think like the Enigma machine during WW2. Only those who have set their machine up to receive the information are capable of translating it and reading it clearly. Obviously, there are those who spend their lives dedicated to cracking these codes however if you make it difficult to crack, it immediately becomes a cost-benefit analysis for those capable of doing so. Chances are, it's not worth it for them no matter how problematic the individual or group may be as it would be easier to simply wait for those individuals to become complacent than to attempt to break a code. If have an autistic level of conforming to these protocols (as you should) than you'll never have problems because by the time anyone capable of breaking these methods can do so, the information they gather likely has zero use to them.

Furthermore most encryption protocols tend to add a layer of "I didn't say that shit" to your message therefore adding plausible deniability in legal matters which is arguably as good as being able to say you weren't involved in anything that those who might seek to do your group harm would claim. I would highly recommend people try out the free coursera course google put out on cybersecurity for more information. if anyone wants tutorials on PGP there are a few good courses on youtube. DM me if you have specific questions I might be able to answer though I would say most of my knowledge is publicly available and you probably don't need me to go into details. I might write up a basic guide though I'm pretty sure I saw one somewhere on the forum already.
 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. L @ Layne_Cobain: Ohhhh hahah @Royboy99 mine too 🤣
  2. R @ Royboy99: @Layne_Cobain, Freud’s favorite.
  3. L @ Layne_Cobain: Sorry you got burnt @ClintEastwood 😞
  4. L @ Layne_Cobain: What is the nootropic @Royboy99
  5. R @ Royboy99: Roughly 1g in 10-15ml of Saline
  6. R @ Royboy99: Honestly the greatest medication I’ve trialed
  7. R @ Royboy99: And it’s not like I’m geeked out crazy looking or acting , just happy, confident , loving life, productive af, greatest nootropic I’ve experienced
  8. R @ Royboy99: Man I really love these misters I make , it takes my day that’s at a 2 and cranks it up to at least a 9… with sustained reups as needed … if only this was fda approved med lol, make my life so much easier
  9. C @ ClintEastwood: Well I got burned on my first buy. It stral sucks the guy has sole things in stock. But definitely what I ordered and I thought he was honest because I asked for something very close to it and i said what about that one. Yeah I got it. And the comms were wired and he was really wanting me to make his forum board look better. Now I know the first thing to look at even before the menu. But I have some business with usps tomorrow and will ask for everything mailed to me especially packages
  10. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: Policies have changed and i would behoove everyone to due their due diligence and go have a look. The guidelines from 5-10 years ago dont apply. And rules, regulations and laws may not either, i mean do you see anyone giving 2 sh1tz about the C0n$tituti@n recently?
  11. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: @rasetreydir, yeah those are good af too
  12. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: @Ross7223, they should boycott pre-paid p0stage
  13. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: @Gulp2788, no they do not as of sept 25, u cant assume everything is the same, or anything for that matter. Its a brave new A-1 world folks.
  14. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: My milage has differed to yours though, I've found them incredibly reliable with their tracking and 3 day delivery is pretty accurate.
  15. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: I agree but U5PS has to go through a legal process to search packages. Private companies can open your mail at their discretion.
  16. Ross7223 @ Ross7223: @Gulp2788 because they always lose pckgs, track1ng is never right, never is 3 day deliv3ry like they say
  17. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @Ross7223 From my understanding that's actually counter-productive, but maybe you know something I don't. Why do you say that?
  18. Ross7223 @ Ross7223: Vendor$ should boycott U5P5, they are terrible!
  19. Thoth @ Thoth: Happy Weekend! Let’s Get It!!!
  20. cannedgoods @ cannedgoods: Happy Weekend everybody! cheers!
Back
Top