Using BOC to make some compounds easier to transport

TommyAC

Member
Joined
May 17, 2021
Messages
132
I will say first, if a mod wants to delete this, that's fine, I just wanted to talk to someone about it, but it's totally understandable if you think this is not the place.

So I took a little too much cyclaz0done with a little to much kr@tom and I think I am a little hypomanic, so I'm getting ''Ideas'' which may be terrible but to me they sound cool, so I'm asking for feedback on this.

What I was thinking was when making an RC the difficulty is that the change you make on the structure won't change it's effect too much, and that's a limitation we constantly see.

What I was thinking, what if we could alter the structure in a way that may completely erase the biological activity but that can be resversed so easily that we could do it at home?

Let me explain with an example I thought off.

image.png

This would be the compound. As far as I know it has no biological activity so it's completely legal within current law. In this example the RC supplier sends a solution of the compound in a solvent, let's say ethylacetate. And you also get a little amount of an acid, maybe HCl, maybe a solid sulfonic acid, I haven't quite figured out that part. You take the acid and the solution, pour them into the same container, stir and wait 30 minutes. 

Now this has a group called BOC, it's a protecting group. It's purpose is that it's easy to remove. Once the 30 minutes go by you end up with a solution of phenmetr@zine, a schedule II stimulant.

image.png

The you let the solvent evaporate, maybe you neutralize the acid with a little bakind soda first and you're left with your magazine as the kids say here

So would anyone be up to doing this type of process? Is this the dumbest idea ever? Do I need to stay quiet when using kr@tom? Let me know below!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Excited for someone new! And whoever gets the job should be stoked.
  2. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: But yeah that whole season made me want to throw up
  3. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: @Layne_Cobain I was pretty busy with holidays and working
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: @Layne_Cobain I'm back! Ready for a coaching hunt! Rooting for your panthers today.
  5. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Hopefully it will just be a good game. Watching TCU’s natty run was about the worst it can get. Please don’t give us another blow out 60 min lol
  6. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: As much as I would like to see Carson Back win a natty after all he’s been through. I just don’t see it
  7. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: The U isn’t stopping that offense or defense. Even if they do manage to some what dumb down that defense. The offense is just way too explosive! Fkin Indiana who would’ve known lol
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: Wasn’t fun watching Oregon get curb stomped in the first half but Indiana deserved the win more
  9. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think Indiana is going to win the natty
  10. D @ drdrizzy13: wow Indiana looking really really good.
  11. L @ Layne_Cobain: I seriously hope our guy @tiquanunderwood didn’t take a header after that Steelers ravens game and harbaughs firing jr ain’t worth it tiquan sports drive all of us equally mad at times hope you’re chillin 😎
  12. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: I’m salty myself, being an Ohio state fan, but Miami is winning by the smallest margin. Indiana going to be hard to beat
  13. M @ meepmoopmeep: I’m salty about the SEC being eliminated but good for Miami. it was a well fought game by both teams
  14. M @ meepmoopmeep: Imagine being a 10 seed barely squeaking into the playoffs becoming a cinderella team
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think they can beat Oregon, but Indiana is too good
  16. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Who thinks Miami stands a chance vs either team (Oregon or Indiana) my bet is Indiana but you never know
  17. S @ sporidicus: delete this though, if it's the wrong place
  18. S @ sporidicus: sorry I don't think I know what this is for. but It's the #4 edition
  19. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: @sporidicus reddit maybe? What mag?
  20. Thoth @ Thoth: @sporidicus honestly depends on the mag. Read read read read the forum
Back
Top