"Xanax Blend" vs Alprazolam (chemical structure the same)

E

Ejuiceman

Member
Joined
May 25, 2016
Messages
216
I'm looking at the listing on one of our verified vendor's websites, for 'xanax blend'. (TRCC)

It has the chemical listed as "8-chloro-1-methyl-6-phenyl-4H-s-triazolo [4,3-α] [1,4] benzodiazepine" which EXACTLY matches the exact chemical formula for Alprazolam on the FDA website.  Is this just alprazolam powder? I read on another website that has "xanax blend" that it's flualprazolam mixed with food additives, which is bullshit, because why the hell would you buy cut powder versus pure flualprazolam powder.

Is this just a way for chinese vendors to list alprazolam without actually calling it 'Alprazolam' in the listing? I'm so confused. I have flualprazolam on hand and wanted to get a gram or two of regular alprazolam, so I obviously don't want to buy more of what I have, especially an adulterated version.

I emailed the vendor and he wouldn't give me a straight answer at all. Anyone have any experience purchasing this chem?

 
Im pretty sure its just flualprazolam. I dont think they can legally sell Alprazolam,  i dont think the Chinese vendors would risk selling illegal chemicals on the clear net(penalties are pretty severe) at best its false advertisment or misleading, the fact that they are selling something with an asterisk next to it is unusual and should be a red flag. Ive never seen an iupac name listed on a Chinese vendor site. You say the real rcs are selling this "blend" and have the chemical formula for alprazolam?  They are known for kinda mislabling chems. (Opce turned out not to be opce via ed results.) So i wouldn't be surprised it they just googled "xanax chemical formal" and copied and pasted it. Im pretty sure its as you stated "I read on another website that has "xanax blend" that it's flualprazolam mixed with food additives"  but this whole "blend with an asterisk" next to it makes me worried that they dont even know what is in there aka floor sweepings.

 
Mgd said:
Im pretty sure its just flualprazolam. I dont think they can legally sell Alprazolam,  i dont think the Chinese vendors would risk selling illegal chemicals on the clear net(penalties are pretty severe) at best its false advertisment or misleading, the fact that they are selling something with an asterisk next to it is unusual and should be a red flag. Ive never seen an iupac name listed on a Chinese vendor site. You say the real rcs are selling this "blend" and have the chemical formula for alprazolam?  They are known for kinda mislabling chems. (Opce turned out not to be opce via ed results.) So i wouldn't be surprised it they just googled "xanax chemical formal" and copied and pasted it. Im pretty sure its as you stated "I read on another website that has "xanax blend" that it's flualprazolam mixed with food additives"  but this whole "blend with an asterisk" next to it makes me worried that they dont even know what is in there aka floor sweepings.
Click to expand...
Lol. I agree with you.

Just seems odd to have a listing for "xanax blend" when they also have a listing for flualprazolam. Why not just call flualprazolam "xanax analog" or something like that for marketing purposes. "Xanax Blend" just seems idiotic and disingenuous. That's pretty much enough to make me never do business with them.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Mgd
The use of the word’s “xanax” and “blend” make me wonder if that’s what they’re actually selling. They’re using a brand name, not a chemical name, and a pill of Xanax is over 99% fillers and binders. 1mg pill weighs 138mg. Perhaps they’re selling a blend meant for pressing pills/bars instead of bulk powder for people who can’t deal with milligram-active substances.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Mgd
People cut flu@lp with food additives so that it will taste exactly like x@nax.  All these fucking companies are selling this "x@nax" BS because some companies in China are marketing shit for easy peasy pressings....TRRC copying the chem formula just sounds like more TRRC trash, which has been really coming out lately....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@DoomKitty It doesn’t seem like a hard rule, but why do I frequently see people subbing out letters and characters/numbers when discussing substances and brands? 

 
DoomKitty said:
@Godzilla The idea is to make things less index-able by search engine bots.  Some people do it and some don't....
Click to expand...
But wouldnt you want people finding  forum via search engines? More exposure, more (possible) donations. I always hated the l33t speak and the reason made even less sense to me. Maybe im missing something ?

 
I think I'm going to order a small amount and send it into ecstacydata just to find out if they are being truthful or not. I'd love to get some raw alprazolam powder, which is what they have it listed as with the chemical structure and chemical name. Fuck it, I think I'll bite the bullet.

 
@Ejuiceman ooof, thats a lot of money LOL.  150 just for it to get tested!! You can just email TRRC and confirm its not.

@Mgd At this point there's such a mix that its simple to duckduckgo anything drug related and this site will usually pop up somewhere in the hits.  I think the idea is the less "simple" exposure the less problem people/vendors/LE etc. You want to attract new members, but you don't necessarily want it to be the top hit for every single drug search.  Anyway, that's the idea of it.  Whether or not it's helpful i dont know.  Theres a lot of ideas that seem to have good logic but aren't necessarily true.  Like the idea that you should never track packs cuz that "proves" you know its coming and they'll use that in court.  Sure that makes sense, but that's never actually happened (nor would it even prove you were the one looking), it's just another idea that makes a lot of sense and so why not just do it...just in case lol...

 
I just stay away from greens, the orange, and really even the 2 are being faked now. In the best case a vendor stepped on real alp with an inert and repressed; but most likely it is a total fake like estaz, flu, etc... If you are lucky, there's nothing toxic as well.

There are so many fakes, some really convincing. I got some that I suspect were another benzo used prior to putting criminal to death in the US. 1-2mg and I got stuck in corners, my whole family noticed the change. I trashed $250 worth as I couldn't even drive safely.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. T @ tylerderrden: Dunno
  2. S @ soupson: What happened to chem genie?
  3. D @ drdrizzy13: LSU is trash and has always been trash but a night game in death valley is unlike anything I've experienced. Except the first game back to the superdome reopened after Katrina destroyed it. Everybody was crying and drunk as shit lol. All time favorite in person sports moment ever.
  4. M @ meepmoopmeep: Kiffin is a traitor and he and LSU deserve each other since they’re both complete trash
  5. D @ drdrizzy13: yea he's a joke lol. Can't stand him.
  6. L @ Layne_Cobain: You know who rly sucks…lane kiffin 😂 dude is all that’s wrong with college sports or at least a big chunk of it…and he lied about being told he could still coach ole miss in the playoffs
  7. D @ drdrizzy13: Hey at least Ole Miss got in. I can't stand LSU. They really sucked this year.
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: as an A&M fan I’m content with us missing the SECCG for that reason. Georgia about to fuck Alabama up
  9. D @ drdrizzy13: Yeah I agree if bama loses I think they are out. That would be 3 losses. I don't see a 3 loss team getting in this year.
  10. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah that’s why sark was pleading his case about that Texas shouldn’t be punished for scheduling a non conference game against the best team and losing if they hadn’t done that they’d probably be in but oh well way it goes there’s always gonna be a few teams who get robbed or feel they got robbed even with a 12 team playofff…if bama loses to Georgia I’d think they’d be out but who knows
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: Alabama also lost to Florida State pretty bad. Whom Florida beat. I just think if they didn't decide to play ohio state the first game. They would be in with 2 losses instead of Alabama.
  12. M @ meepmoopmeep: @drdrizzy13 Texas lost to Florida of all teams, they weren’t heading for the playoffs anyways imo. At least not this year
  13. D @ drdrizzy13: Texas is offically out of the playoffs they didn't make the top 12. I do wish they were in it. They showed up against Texas AM. But there fatal flaw was scheduling Ohio State for their opening. Which would have been great if they won but they are a 3 loss team now.
  14. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah idk about arch I could see him staying with Sark for another year but if he plays rly well in the playoff who knows that is if they get in
  15. D @ drdrizzy13: Man a lot of Saints fan want Arch but I think he said he is playing another year. I would take him probably. But if Texas AM QB comes out or Ohio State's I think you gotta take one if your picking top 2.
  16. L @ Layne_Cobain: Is the qb class supposed to be stacked or thin for draft in April I follow college ball but I can’t think right now I think there’s def at least a few high potential qb declaring
  17. D @ drdrizzy13: Right now I believe we pick 2nd. ATM.
  18. D @ drdrizzy13: At first I figured he might be able to do something but our position players suck. We are playing a rookie QB. O-line sucks. It needs to be blown up. I hope we tank for the first pick
  19. L @ Layne_Cobain: Hopefully you guys maybe find a solid qb option in the draft you should end up with a very good pick
  20. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah dude Moore def does not seem like the guy for yall need to clean house
Back
Top