Alg 265 (30Mg Roxi)

Havent seen it! But ive seen several others lately like a 20 mg with R/P then other side 20. Big white pill too!!

 
Bumping this topic - interested in recent feedback given some non DBG reading I've done.  Thanks.

 
Bumping this topic - interested in recent feedback given some non DBG reading I've done.  Thanks.
anthropod, I got a couple of these in an order about 2 months ago and they were good. Do you have reason to believe yours are not?

mbs

 
Bumping this topic - interested in recent feedback given some non DBG reading I've done.  Thanks.
anthropod, I got a couple of these in an order about 2 months ago and they were good. Do you have reason to believe yours are not?

mbs
They look a little worn but that could be from transit... I don't want to over analyze the front text/numeric imprint versus an official image.  On the opposite side, I have some that have the line score vertical, some horizontal, and some at various other angles...  any input is appreciated.  I cut one in half and it cut fairly well, two main pieces remain with minimal loss.

 
@‌anthropod, that does seem odd. I don't blame you for being concerned. Anybody else ever experienced this? You might think about taking this description to the SY general discussion.

mbs

 
@‌anthropod, that does seem odd. I don't blame you for being concerned. Anybody else ever experienced this? You might think about taking this description to the SY general discussion.

mbs
Thanks, I did my best to summarize it over there.

 
Bumping this topic - interested in recent feedback given some non DBG reading I've done.  Thanks.
anthropod, I got a couple of these in an order about 2 months ago and they were good. Do you have reason to believe yours are not?

mbs
They look a little worn but that could be from transit... I don't want to over analyze the front text/numeric imprint versus an official image.  On the opposite side, I have some that have the line score vertical, some horizontal, and some at various other angles...  any input is appreciated.  I cut one in half and it cut fairly well, two main pieces remain with minimal loss.
Anthropod -- I just received a batch of alg like what you're describing, with the scoring going every which way on the other side of the pill as the letters and numbers. The ones I got aren't worn at all though. Anyway, was curious if you remember if the ones you had with the wonky score marks all turned out to be fine or not?

*edit: I have since sampled and they appear to be fine. No worries. It's odd that the score marks are every which way, though. Maybe always like that and I just noticed this time? Anyway, I'm curious, did you find that your were good, too?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bumping this topic - interested in recent feedback given some non DBG reading I've done.  Thanks.
anthropod, I got a couple of these in an order about 2 months ago and they were good. Do you have reason to believe yours are not?

mbs
They look a little worn but that could be from transit... I don't want to over analyze the front text/numeric imprint versus an official image.  On the opposite side, I have some that have the line score vertical, some horizontal, and some at various other angles...  any input is appreciated.  I cut one in half and it cut fairly well, two main pieces remain with minimal loss.
Anthropod -- I just received a batch of alg like what you're describing, with the scoring going every which way on the other side of the pill as the letters and numbers. The ones I got aren't worn at all though. Anyway, was curious if you remember if the ones you had with the wonky score marks all turned out to be fine or not?

*edit: I have since sampled and they appear to be fine. No worries. It's odd that the score marks are every which way, though. Maybe always like that and I just noticed this time? Anyway, I'm curious, did you find that your were good, too?
Two, I too have sampled and they have passed my tests, especially on Sunday afternoons watching NFL Red Zone.

 
  • Like
Reactions: two
Bumping this topic - interested in recent feedback given some non DBG reading I've done.  Thanks.
anthropod, I got a couple of these in an order about 2 months ago and they were good. Do you have reason to believe yours are not?

mbs
They look a little worn but that could be from transit... I don't want to over analyze the front text/numeric imprint versus an official image.  On the opposite side, I have some that have the line score vertical, some horizontal, and some at various other angles...  any input is appreciated.  I cut one in half and it cut fairly well, two main pieces remain with minimal loss.
Anthropod -- I just received a batch of alg like what you're describing, with the scoring going every which way on the other side of the pill as the letters and numbers. The ones I got aren't worn at all though. Anyway, was curious if you remember if the ones you had with the wonky score marks all turned out to be fine or not?

*edit: I have since sampled and they appear to be fine. No worries. It's odd that the score marks are every which way, though. Maybe always like that and I just noticed this time? Anyway, I'm curious, did you find that your were good, too?
Two, I too have sampled and they have passed my tests, especially on Sunday afternoons watching NFL Red Zone.
Thanks for the reply, anthropod!

 
I have a bit of experience with these and did indeed also notice the random, inconsistent scores (as I have with nearly all rox-3omg brands).  They are absolutely just as good as pretty much every other brand, in my opinion. 

 
How much different is an official 30mg IR 'Roxy' than simply wiping off the coating from a 30mg ER Oxy?  Is there a difference at all?

btw, I take these orally--no snorting or shooting...

 
A little late to the party, but for general knowledge... when I used to live in a sunnier state, I had an f2f source that I got 30s from as he had a script. Usually they were m boxes, but he'd get the alg too some months. After a time, it did seem like the alg, while legit, just took a bit longer to kick in than the good old m boxes. I put it down to just being a difference in filler ingredients maybe not breaking down quite as fast, as that's a common issue in varying brands of medications. It's why ben@dryl knocks me on my ass, while generic diphen slowly rocks me to sleep. 

Only slightly related, but I miss my f2f. I got  30 Rock in for $10 an episode and 4 dill pickles for $5. Helped that he was family I guess. "Wish we could turn back time, to the good ol' days..."

 
An f2f would be heaven for me. :)   Thanks for sharing all this info.  Much appreciated.

 
Trying to replace my f2f with someone here. Soon as my bit clear I’ll be sponsoring to get the best info poss. 

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Leggo Minter baby!
  2. Gracie5 @ Gracie5: All the answers and more discussion about the types of boxes is accessible with Search. Mostly you can find this under Shipping and Tracking. When you search mailboxes you find numerous entries.
  3. Bodix @ Bodix: But this was a few years ago
  4. R @ RedMan39: I almost feel bad for Josh Allen he’s just getting older I can’t believe they fired mcdermot
  5. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  6. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: no doubt
  12. Thoth @ Thoth: Josh Allen will be 1st Ballot HOF
  13. D @ drdrizzy13: word I wanted Josh Allen to win a Superbowl. They've been so close for a few years now. Josh Allen messed up last game.
  14. R @ RedMan39: Agreed sucks the bills didn’t make it
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think pats vs hawks superbowl
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: saying that as a rams fan
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: The rams are definitely good but I don’t believe they are seahawk level good
  18. L @ Layne_Cobain: Especially sucks the bills didn’t pull it off now since Nix is out and even with that Denver defense predict pats have an easy route to Super Bowl now…pats rams or pats hawks rematch? Perhaps
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: The Hawks look STRONG
  20. R @ RedMan39: Yeah my teams not in it (as usual) so just hoping for good games not blowouts lol
Back
Top