Reaction scores?

Galacticstar

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2024
Messages
1
How do reaction scores work with vendors? How are they rated? Does it have to do with their messaging back and fourth with members? Lmk
 
How do reaction scores work with vendors? How are they rated? Does it have to do with their messaging back and fourth with members? Lmk
Reaction scores are not relevant.

Members provide feedback in their posts. You'll see some common themes in the feedback though there's no standard format.
 
We need a WTF emoji. 😂
Agreed! That may end up being the most used on here as of late 🤣. Also, having a thumbs down reaction, or a way to track negative reactions vs positive reactions.

Because to your point, someone could have 200 “WTF” reactions, but only 1 “Like” reaction because they post absolute nonsense. Yet other members would sinply see a reaction score of 201 unless they really wanted to dig and see the total # of each.
 
Hahaha… good point. And a lot of nonsense posts just don’t have any reactions aside from maybe one from someone trying to boost their score, and they don’t read the posts 😂

and then there is the passive aggressive use of emoji vs sincere use. Like when I use the “confused” emoji, I really mean “that’s not what I heard!”
 
Yeah I forget the rules but I think it’s either posts or reaction scores that dictate privileges in the beginning? Like how many DMs you can send or something. I completely forget. Other than that I look at absence of reactions as “no one wants to co-sign it.” But only if it’s a post with strong opinions expressed.
 
Hahaha… good point. And a lot of nonsense posts just don’t have any reactions aside from maybe one from someone trying to boost their score, and they don’t read the posts 😂

and then there is the passive aggressive use of emoji vs sincere use. Like when I use the “confused” emoji, I really mean “that’s not what I heard!”
Yep I’m right there with you on using certain emojis as a ways to express differing opinions!
Yeah I forget the rules but I think it’s either posts or reaction scores that dictate privileges in the beginning? Like how many DMs you can send or something. I completely forget. Other than that I look at absence of reactions as “no one wants to co-sign it.” But only if it’s a post with strong opinions expressed.
And that’s so interesting, tbh I had no clue that was even a thing. Someone needs to slap me on the wrist and tell me to go reread the DBG rules like I tell others to do 😆.

At the end of the day, some added chat functionality would be nice, but I get that this isn’t FB or IG we’re working with here, so I can only be so critical LOL
 
lol don’t feel bad! I had totally forgotten about it too and still don’t remember and it’s probably changed since I was starting out. But I know u gotta put in some work to get privileges which makes sense.

So it’s relevant in a practical functional sense but not really relevant when you’re assessing the credibility of a post. Because I’ve seen likes on posts where someone is just being an asshole to a new member for asking a question. And not an annoying question like “where is the vendors email address?” When I see a passive aggressive reply and laughing emoji reactions, that bothers me. Wow that’s so cool to make someone feel dumb. Thumbs up! Hahaha.
 
Last edited:
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. M @ meepmoopmeep: Wasn’t fun watching Oregon get curb stomped in the first half but Indiana deserved the win more
  2. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think Indiana is going to win the natty
  3. D @ drdrizzy13: wow Indiana looking really really good.
  4. L @ Layne_Cobain: I seriously hope our guy @tiquanunderwood didn’t take a header after that Steelers ravens game and harbaughs firing jr ain’t worth it tiquan sports drive all of us equally mad at times hope you’re chillin 😎
  5. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: I’m salty myself, being an Ohio state fan, but Miami is winning by the smallest margin. Indiana going to be hard to beat
  6. M @ meepmoopmeep: I’m salty about the SEC being eliminated but good for Miami. it was a well fought game by both teams
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: Imagine being a 10 seed barely squeaking into the playoffs becoming a cinderella team
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think they can beat Oregon, but Indiana is too good
  9. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Who thinks Miami stands a chance vs either team (Oregon or Indiana) my bet is Indiana but you never know
  10. S @ sporidicus: delete this though, if it's the wrong place
  11. S @ sporidicus: sorry I don't think I know what this is for. but It's the #4 edition
  12. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: @sporidicus reddit maybe? What mag?
  13. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: Anyone heard of ethyl midazolam, cyclopropyl midazolam or ethyl flualprazolam?
  14. D @ dhertz9192@gm: Delete
  15. Thoth @ Thoth: @sporidicus honestly depends on the mag. Read read read read the forum
  16. Thoth @ Thoth: CFP needs more of an NBA or MLB playoff structure but that would be hard to structure. Divisions inside Leagues
  17. S @ sporidicus: or is there a better place on the forum to ask
  18. S @ sporidicus: can anyone help me with a chemistry problem? someone purposefully poured powdered sugar into my mag, i need to see if i can clean it off. any chemists here?
  19. M @ meepmoopmeep: agreed
  20. D @ drdrizzy13: Yea it will be tough but I think they might just have enough. I guess we will see what tomorrrow night?
Back
Top