MEMBER VERIFICATION FOR SECURITY

You are the only one that can decode it but it is encoded with your public key which everyone has access to. How does that prevent me from pretending to be someone I'm not?
 
I always like the traditional style of just smoking some crack on live video while I lay out today’s newspaper to sleep on. I find it buys me some credibility, but I lose confidence in my future with the bureau. They already pulled me from cybercrimes to work the field...outside, where the grass needs clipping. But even here my boss won't cut down on the work I have to cut down. Like, it's always greener across the fence but it never stops growing and I'm getting tired of being read my Miranda Rights just for showing up undercover and investigate the landscape for threats against its top Elle Eee agency's lawn. I got in this business to arrest big, notorious people who had dreams and used to read "Word, Up" magazine; people who were just hustling trying to make enough money to feed their daughters...now, I'm not even sure who cares or what I'm taking about. It's almost like I don't even remember what I came to do here. Oh, renew my membership, then I saw some privacy discussions and got absorbed, had something thoughtful to add, and instead rambled on about music and landscaping, and Big League Chew, or something. i miss Big League Chew. That was my dog. He never could quite finish his tobacco but he enjoyed other things. RIP.
 
Maybe ask them to “like” a specific post on the forum, even in an obscure thread, with that account?

Only my public key would sign that way to prove to one person or the whole community that i am who i say i am and vice versa if you do the same with your account.
I'm always trying to make sure I'm running on vpn or encryption active. I'm totally green / new at understanding this type of stuff. Totally necessary.
I'm more of a blue collar type but have the intelligence and patience to learn anything ... just about..lol.
Any tips for safety are always welcome and appreciated my man :)
 
Still waiting on my magazine order from December here…
They're banned. Gone. It's not coming. I suggest getting a paid sponsorship so you can keep yourself informed on different vendors, which ones are good,which ones might be acting shady, or whatever.
 
You are the only one that can decode it but it is encoded with your public key which everyone has access to. How does that prevent me from pretending to be someone I'm not?
In answer to your question it’s pretty easy, both users use pgp encryption man. We all do. And can verify each other without a doubt. This is common darknet practice. It’s a 2 way street. That will probably never get adopted by clearnet for whatever reason…. It’s actually very easier but people make it very hard or are just stuck in a cycle of non change.
 
@Cardinal2800 @PHXINC I don't think you are understanding the initial question.

The question was how does he verify that someone who emailed him and said "My username on DBG is XYZ" that the person sending the email is actually XYZ on DBG. The simple answer is: reply to the email and ask him to send you a DM on DBG. But as he points out DMs are only available to be sent between paid members. If the emailer is claiming to be a member who is not a paid sponsor then what do you do? Having a PGP encrypted conversation between you and the person emailing you does not prove he is the owner of a.specific username on the site. As @knofflebon cleverly points out, in that case you can tell him to prove it by going to DGB and liking a particular post. If a like appears on that post from that user then odds are very much in favor of it being the person who emailed you.
 
ahhh sorry gotcha. Sorry, i misunderstood.. well i didn't actually, their pgp block could be in their profile as is the case always during these scenarios. . But umm lliking a post is definitely...easier and ...clever? Sheesh vending is tough these days,nhowever u swing it, i feel for you guys,
 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. LW815 @ LW815: 124k? Maybe 125 tn?
  2. Clash283 @ Clash283: I'm not sure but it isn't anything for anyone else to worry about.
  3. CalFresh @ CalFresh: fuck Qubic! WTF? @xenxra what's your take
  4. LW815 @ LW815: Wait what? Not entirely sure we’re talking about the same thing anymore
  5. Clash283 @ Clash283: So, I guess I thought as it related to that it wouldn't be bad to just let him know what's going on in detail in dms. That's why I didn't even mention a subject. But I haven't been told otherwise, if that was the case the giveaway wouldn't exist.
  6. Clash283 @ Clash283: It was related to the shout box
  7. Clash283 @ Clash283: @LW815 ya, the award was given in the shout out box. I have reached out and he asked me to verify with admin....
  8. LW815 @ LW815: @Clash283 I probably should have myself instead of replying in the shoutbox but admins always been responsive to my DMs. I just saw a worrisome idea and can’t bring myself to not respond with HR info, though admittedly should have DMed the user instead. @Gracie5 may be available if @Admin isn’t though I can’t tag her in the shoutbox for some reason
  9. Clash283 @ Clash283: @Admin would mind reading my message regarding the shout box context?
  10. LW815 @ LW815: This probably isn’t a discussion for the shout box but in hopes to prevent something harmful from happening - volumetric solutions are the only truly safe way to ensure DIY jobs are properly, evenly mixed. Anything else short of proper equipment can and almost surely will result in inconsistency. Though I guess if you had the patience and means to properly weigh each individually that could also ensure proper measurement per thing you’re making
  11. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good Morning Everyone
  12. O @ ochemdim: @The Doctor RC yeah no 🚩. Bunches of people have food processors in their kitchens. Some do a great job at mixing. It really depends on what you’re wanting to create. For example,cl0br0maz0ļam caps with ~15% difference between them would be massive in terms of ëffects. 1o0 mġ g@bapëntins on the other hand, not so much. There will be hot spots with a good processor though. Farm@ mixers are on another level, but also very expensive
  13. The Doctor RC @ The Doctor RC: @ochemdim but shah could do it without raising a R3d FL4G? A high-grade food processor runs very quickly and if you let it run fast enough, I mean it gets that stuff mixed up pretty damn good..
  14. O @ ochemdim: @The Doctor RC not a bad idea in theory and not having a p1ll pre$$ hanging out is always a good idea. But a food processor isn’t going to cut it if you’re going for p0tëncy consistency in the theoretical caps. Farm@ companies use wayyyyy more intensive and expensive mixing equipment to get homogeneous caps.
  15. The Doctor RC @ The Doctor RC: @Perfect Meds Thanks for the welcome brother
  16. The Doctor RC @ The Doctor RC: So I had this idea of creating something called capsule kings so like instead. Instead of pr355ing bars I would use color coded capsules. A food processor would mix anything pretty much almost perfect so I would just need to find some form of p0wd3r that has no effect to add some weight to it. Does anybody have any thoughts on it?
  17. L @ Lstnfunpaintr: Any body hear tried this 3 meo 2 oxo pcp that’s popped up ?
  18. ms3031 @ ms3031: @Sinnin no idea. My chemistry knowledge is limited but I have tried what was called Tilldin in the US that is what the EU/ Asia variation for Tillidin and it was dec but for sure but I keep hearing reviews in activity, most written by heavy opioid users but I am not one. I don't believe it is though, but I have t done much reading on it
  19. Clash283 @ Clash283: Keep strivin yall, in 24 hours I had my GOOD ex hitting me up, school set up, etc.... dont give up 5 minutes before the miracle happens! back to the hustle! Stay safe and thank you to all who ive been around! Yall know.
  20. Sinnin @ Sinnin: @ms3031 isn't that basically just a racetam?
Back
Top