is 𝐦𝕖т𝐇𝔬Ж𝑒Ｔ𝐀𝓶ƗŇᵉ gone?

Gulp2788

Gulp2788

Member
RUBY SPONSOR
Joined
Nov 15, 2024
Messages
124
It was a favorite of many people and my fellow researchers back in the day I wish it was still around however I have been unable to find it for a long long time, I think it needs more availability and I believe that if someone were to offer it they would find the market for buyers very easily. Especially if it can be Şʸ𝐧ｔ𝔥є𝐒𝐢𝓏𝒆ⓓ in large quantity
 
Gulp2788 said:
It was a favorite of many people and my fellow researchers back in the day I wish it was still around however I have been unable to find it for a long long time, I think it needs more availability and I believe that if someone were to offer it they would find the market for buyers very easily. Especially if it can be Şʸ𝐧ｔ𝔥є𝐒𝐢𝓏𝒆ⓓ in large quantity
Click to expand...
Yes, sadly MXĒ is no longer being made aside from some very small custom sŷnthš by very experienced çhëmîsts or leftover pre-ban from some smart SOB’s personal collection who foresaw the current supply/demand imbalance.

You say that if someone were to sŷnth it in large amounts, they’d easily find a market. That’s very likely unfortunately not true. At least not enough of a market to make the difficult, expensive (and dangerous) sŷnth anywhere near worth the risk. Someone would need a fully functioning łâb with lots of expensive glàşşwarè, fúmèhoòd, and dozens of appropriate tools.

The market for quasi-lègál díssòs is actually much smaller compared to what these Internet forums & rěddǐt would have you believe. I guarantee if you asked 100 people, at random if they knew what MXĒ was, 98 would have no clue, maybe 2 would say yes. Out of the 2 that actually knew what it was, maybe 1 would be willing to spend the (at minimum) $300+/g cost that it would undoubtedly go for.

Not to be a Debby downer, I absolutely used to LOVE MXĒ as well circa 2010’s when it was easy to come by. But it’s been near-extinct for at least close to a decade now, and I don’t foresee that changing anytime soon 😢.

-MB
 
Is it such a difficult and dangerous synth? I am a layman when it comes to chemistry these days, I have been intending to refresh myself on my basic chemistry but haven't lately.
 
Gulp2788 said:
Is it such a difficult and dangerous synth? I am a layman when it comes to chemistry these days, I have been intending to refresh myself on my basic chemistry but haven't lately.
Click to expand...
Dangerous in terms of the reagents needed to easily make it. You wouldn’t want to be messing with them in an under-ventilated area.

My understanding is that àrylcyclôhêxylaminès are all rather difficult synths that require very closely watched precûrşòrş.
 
That makes me sad, oh well, such is the way things go in this world. What are good alternatives? Anyone discovered anything that scratches that itch? I have tried some of the stuff currently being marketed but it's not as long-acting and doesn't quite hit that beautiful mind-body connection M used to. K is too short and tbh too pricey for what it is, plus part of what made M so interesting was the fact that it likely is less harmful to the bladder as K. Damn the lawmakers for deciding to outlaw it before it could be properly trialed.
 
Gulp2788 said:
That makes me sad, oh well, such is the way things go in this world. What are good alternatives? Anyone discovered anything that scratches that itch? I have tried some of the stuff currently being marketed but it's not as long-acting and doesn't quite hit that beautiful mind-body connection M used to. K is too short and tbh too pricey for what it is, plus part of what made M so interesting was the fact that it likely is less harmful to the bladder as K. Damn the lawmakers for deciding to outlaw it before it could be properly trialed.
Click to expand...
Never tried the og em ex ee to compare to but have you tried M×PeaÇPê@? I think Em Ex Ee is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇ€ whereas M×PeaÇPêã is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇPë@. From reports I've read it seems like generally when attached to the same group, Pë@Ç€ê's tend towards a more p$¥ç€dëliç hë@d$pâç€ whereas Pë@ÇPë@'s tend towards a more "füñçtï0ñâl/çlë@rh€@déd" headspace, so I would guess M×Pë@ÇPêã would be lacking in some of the depth/m@giç a lot of people reported with M×€ but may have similarities in other areas. Would guess it would be riskier to try to h0l€ on than M×£ too. My research on M×PÇPe@ has been pretty much entirely rëçrê@ti0ñ@l and not super dëëp or pr0f0und. Granted I've not pushed my page count too high but I found even a low page count of 3-H0-PeãÇPé@ to have a lot more dëpth than M×PÇPëã.

These are ones I've not personally researched but some people have mentioned 3-Më0-PÇ€ as having a similar "m@giç" to M×€ but that one's pretty hard to find and probably more $timul@tiñg and m@ñiç, riskier to h0l€ on than M×€. M×EyePeaAre, M×PeaAre, DM×€, and maybe H×€ were at points marketed as M×€ alternatives iirc, but unsure if that was just marketing hype/unsure how they compared to the og, and they aren't particularly easy to find anymore either.
 
jjjjjjjjj said:
Never tried the og em ex ee to compare to but have you tried M×PeaÇPê@? I think Em Ex Ee is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇ€ whereas M×PeaÇPêã is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇPë@. From reports I've read it seems like generally when attached to the same group, Pë@Ç€ê's tend towards a more p$¥ç€dëliç hë@d$pâç€ whereas Pë@ÇPë@'s tend towards a more "füñçtï0ñâl/çlë@rh€@déd" headspace, so I would guess M×Pë@ÇPêã would be lacking in some of the depth/m@giç a lot of people reported with M×€ but may have similarities in other areas. Would guess it would be riskier to try to h0l€ on than M×£ too. My research on M×PÇPe@ has been pretty much entirely rëçrê@ti0ñ@l and not super dëëp or pr0f0und. Granted I've not pushed my page count too high but I found even a low page count of 3-H0-PeãÇPé@ to have a lot more dëpth than M×PÇPëã.

These are ones I've not personally researched but some people have mentioned 3-Më0-PÇ€ as having a similar "m@giç" to M×€ but that one's pretty hard to find and probably more $timul@tiñg and m@ñiç, riskier to h0l€ on than M×€. M×EyePeaAre, M×PeaAre, DM×€, and maybe H×€ were at points marketed as M×€ alternatives iirc, but unsure if that was just marketing hype/unsure how they compared to the og, and they aren't particularly easy to find anymore either.
Click to expand...
I have tried ๓xp¢p, it is good and it has similar-ish features to it What risks do you think are there with it? I have pushed my page count quite high with it and been fine it seems very forgiving. 3 h0 sounds interesting it appears rare though maybe I ask a ᏉᏋᏁᎴᎧᏒ?
 
Gulp2788 said:
I have tried ๓xp¢p, it is good and it has similar-ish features to it What risks do you think are there with it? I have pushed my page count quite high with it and been fine it seems very forgiving. 3 h0 sounds interesting it appears rare though maybe I ask a ᏉᏋᏁᎴᎧᏒ?
Click to expand...
Re: m×pçp risks, I was mainly thinking in terms of in comparison to m×€ maybe a greater risk of m@ni@ pushing page count higher, though probably not a particularly high risk of that when compared to something like 3-h0 or 3-m€0 (though I've not tried 3-m€0 either, only 3-h0 and 3-m€, might try 3, 4 em dee in the future too).
 
Gulp2788 said:
That makes me sad, oh well, such is the way things go in this world. What are good alternatives? Anyone discovered anything that scratches that itch? I have tried some of the stuff currently being marketed but it's not as long-acting and doesn't quite hit that beautiful mind-body connection M used to. K is too short and tbh too pricey for what it is, plus part of what made M so interesting was the fact that it likely is less harmful to the bladder as K. Damn the lawmakers for deciding to outlaw it before it could be properly trialed.
Click to expand...
I’ve never tried the OG MX$ (regretfully) but I have tried DMX$ (which has been described as being somewhat akin to a “MX$ lite”) I found it to be very pleasant. Great immersion enhancement, and “holey” considering it trends toward being lightly to moderately stimulating. It also smells delicious (like blue candy). I’ve also read that that MXP$/MXIP$ are in the same ballpark and chemically it makes sense, though I’ve yet to try either of those two.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: you're right. Everyone please read the rules!!!!
  2. SubStanc3 @ SubStanc3: @Gulp2788 relax family, I understand your anger and frustration but some of these folks are new. But your definitely right, please use the allocated locations for promos, there’s a reason for that.
  3. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @Admin
  4. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: goddamn it, there is a place for talking to members about stuff, use that stop using shoutbox
  5. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: shoutbox is not for advertising what the fuck are you guys doing are you dumb????
  6. proton369 @ proton369: 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎
  7. B @ blackstarchem: Also have new 5f batch that is bright white. Have clean k2 sheets
  8. B @ blackstarchem: 3 for price of 2 sale ends tomorrow!
  9. SubStanc3 @ SubStanc3: Want everyone to go check out ROI rq and spend 5 mins going through is thread. This individual is an issue
  10. proton369 @ proton369: @Benzolord my email is on my vendor page my friend. You can email me there
  11. E @ elleoh: oops!
  12. G @ gatekeeper1: I've already donated. where can I go to find legitimate vendors?
  13. Benzolord @ Benzolord: Autogen please email me on proton!
  14. SubStanc3 @ SubStanc3: 😭
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: This roi guy is psychotic 😂 Sorry to everyone who got burnt
  16. proton369 @ proton369: 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎
  17. Y @ Yaugae5121: Hope the week is goin smooth fellas and fellettes!
  18. Sweatergod @ Sweatergod: How do I get in touch w the admins
  19. R @ rhodium: @tonyget1988 me
  20. T @ tonyget1988: Plz
Back
Top