is 𝐦𝕖т𝐇𝔬Ж𝑒Ｔ𝐀𝓶ƗŇᵉ gone?

[Gulp2788]

It was a favorite of many people and my fellow researchers back in the day I wish it was still around however I have been unable to find it for a long long time, I think it needs more availability and I believe that if someone were to offer it they would find the market for buyers very easily. Especially if it can be Şʸ𝐧ｔ𝔥є𝐒𝐢𝓏𝒆ⓓ in large quantity

 

[Mammasboi123]

It was a favorite of many people and my fellow researchers back in the day I wish it was still around however I have been unable to find it for a long long time, I think it needs more availability and I believe that if someone were to offer it they would find the market for buyers very easily. Especially if it can be Şʸ𝐧ｔ𝔥є𝐒𝐢𝓏𝒆ⓓ in large quantity

Yes, sadly MXĒ is no longer being made aside from some very small custom sŷnthš by very experienced çhëmîsts or leftover pre-ban from some smart SOB’s personal collection who foresaw the current supply/demand imbalance.

You say that if someone were to sŷnth it in large amounts, they’d easily find a market. That’s very likely unfortunately not true. At least not enough of a market to make the difficult, expensive (and dangerous) sŷnth anywhere near worth the risk. Someone would need a fully functioning łâb with lots of expensive glàşşwarè, fúmèhoòd, and dozens of appropriate tools.

The market for quasi-lègál díssòs is actually much smaller compared to what these Internet forums & rěddǐt would have you believe. I guarantee if you asked 100 people, at random if they knew what MXĒ was, 98 would have no clue, maybe 2 would say yes. Out of the 2 that actually knew what it was, maybe 1 would be willing to spend the (at minimum) $300+/g cost that it would undoubtedly go for.

Not to be a Debby downer, I absolutely used to LOVE MXĒ as well circa 2010’s when it was easy to come by. But it’s been near-extinct for at least close to a decade now, and I don’t foresee that changing anytime soon .

-MB

 

[Gulp2788]

Is it such a difficult and dangerous synth? I am a layman when it comes to chemistry these days, I have been intending to refresh myself on my basic chemistry but haven't lately.

 

[Mammasboi123]

Is it such a difficult and dangerous synth? I am a layman when it comes to chemistry these days, I have been intending to refresh myself on my basic chemistry but haven't lately.

Dangerous in terms of the reagents needed to easily make it. You wouldn’t want to be messing with them in an under-ventilated area.

My understanding is that àrylcyclôhêxylaminès are all rather difficult synths that require very closely watched precûrşòrş.

 

[Gulp2788]

That makes me sad, oh well, such is the way things go in this world. What are good alternatives? Anyone discovered anything that scratches that itch? I have tried some of the stuff currently being marketed but it's not as long-acting and doesn't quite hit that beautiful mind-body connection M used to. K is too short and tbh too pricey for what it is, plus part of what made M so interesting was the fact that it likely is less harmful to the bladder as K. Damn the lawmakers for deciding to outlaw it before it could be properly trialed.

 

[jjjjjjjjj]

That makes me sad, oh well, such is the way things go in this world. What are good alternatives? Anyone discovered anything that scratches that itch? I have tried some of the stuff currently being marketed but it's not as long-acting and doesn't quite hit that beautiful mind-body connection M used to. K is too short and tbh too pricey for what it is, plus part of what made M so interesting was the fact that it likely is less harmful to the bladder as K. Damn the lawmakers for deciding to outlaw it before it could be properly trialed.

Never tried the og em ex ee to compare to but have you tried M×PeaÇPê@? I think Em Ex Ee is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇ€ whereas M×PeaÇPêã is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇPë@. From reports I've read it seems like generally when attached to the same group, Pë@Ç€ê's tend towards a more p$¥ç€dëliç hë@d$pâç€ whereas Pë@ÇPë@'s tend towards a more "füñçtï0ñâl/çlë@rh€@déd" headspace, so I would guess M×Pë@ÇPêã would be lacking in some of the depth/m@giç a lot of people reported with M×€ but may have similarities in other areas. Would guess it would be riskier to try to h0l€ on than M×£ too. My research on M×PÇPe@ has been pretty much entirely rëçrê@ti0ñ@l and not super dëëp or pr0f0und. Granted I've not pushed my page count too high but I found even a low page count of 3-H0-PeãÇPé@ to have a lot more dëpth than M×PÇPëã.

These are ones I've not personally researched but some people have mentioned 3-Më0-PÇ€ as having a similar "m@giç" to M×€ but that one's pretty hard to find and probably more $timul@tiñg and m@ñiç, riskier to h0l€ on than M×€. M×EyePeaAre, M×PeaAre, DM×€, and maybe H×€ were at points marketed as M×€ alternatives iirc, but unsure if that was just marketing hype/unsure how they compared to the og, and they aren't particularly easy to find anymore either.

 

[Gulp2788]

Never tried the og em ex ee to compare to but have you tried M×PeaÇPê@? I think Em Ex Ee is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇ€ whereas M×PeaÇPêã is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇPë@. From reports I've read it seems like generally when attached to the same group, Pë@Ç€ê's tend towards a more p$¥ç€dëliç hë@d$pâç€ whereas Pë@ÇPë@'s tend towards a more "füñçtï0ñâl/çlë@rh€@déd" headspace, so I would guess M×Pë@ÇPêã would be lacking in some of the depth/m@giç a lot of people reported with M×€ but may have similarities in other areas. Would guess it would be riskier to try to h0l€ on than M×£ too. My research on M×PÇPe@ has been pretty much entirely rëçrê@ti0ñ@l and not super dëëp or pr0f0und. Granted I've not pushed my page count too high but I found even a low page count of 3-H0-PeãÇPé@ to have a lot more dëpth than M×PÇPëã.

These are ones I've not personally researched but some people have mentioned 3-Më0-PÇ€ as having a similar "m@giç" to M×€ but that one's pretty hard to find and probably more $timul@tiñg and m@ñiç, riskier to h0l€ on than M×€. M×EyePeaAre, M×PeaAre, DM×€, and maybe H×€ were at points marketed as M×€ alternatives iirc, but unsure if that was just marketing hype/unsure how they compared to the og, and they aren't particularly easy to find anymore either.

I have tried ๓xp¢p, it is good and it has similar-ish features to it What risks do you think are there with it? I have pushed my page count quite high with it and been fine it seems very forgiving. 3 h0 sounds interesting it appears rare though maybe I ask a ᏉᏋᏁᎴᎧᏒ?

 

[jjjjjjjjj]

I have tried ๓xp¢p, it is good and it has similar-ish features to it What risks do you think are there with it? I have pushed my page count quite high with it and been fine it seems very forgiving. 3 h0 sounds interesting it appears rare though maybe I ask a ᏉᏋᏁᎴᎧᏒ?

Re: m×pçp risks, I was mainly thinking in terms of in comparison to m×€ maybe a greater risk of m@ni@ pushing page count higher, though probably not a particularly high risk of that when compared to something like 3-h0 or 3-m€0 (though I've not tried 3-m€0 either, only 3-h0 and 3-m€, might try 3, 4 em dee in the future too).

 

[DonnieDarko]

That makes me sad, oh well, such is the way things go in this world. What are good alternatives? Anyone discovered anything that scratches that itch? I have tried some of the stuff currently being marketed but it's not as long-acting and doesn't quite hit that beautiful mind-body connection M used to. K is too short and tbh too pricey for what it is, plus part of what made M so interesting was the fact that it likely is less harmful to the bladder as K. Damn the lawmakers for deciding to outlaw it before it could be properly trialed.

I’ve never tried the OG MX$ (regretfully) but I have tried DMX$ (which has been described as being somewhat akin to a “MX$ lite”) I found it to be very pleasant. Great immersion enhancement, and “holey” considering it trends toward being lightly to moderately stimulating. It also smells delicious (like blue candy). I’ve also read that that MXP$/MXIP$ are in the same ballpark and chemically it makes sense, though I’ve yet to try either of those two.