is 𝐦𝕖т𝐇𝔬Ж𝑒Ｔ𝐀𝓶ƗŇᵉ gone?

Gulp2788

Gulp2788

Member
RUBY SPONSOR
Joined
Nov 15, 2024
Messages
99
It was a favorite of many people and my fellow researchers back in the day I wish it was still around however I have been unable to find it for a long long time, I think it needs more availability and I believe that if someone were to offer it they would find the market for buyers very easily. Especially if it can be Şʸ𝐧ｔ𝔥є𝐒𝐢𝓏𝒆ⓓ in large quantity
 
Gulp2788 said:
It was a favorite of many people and my fellow researchers back in the day I wish it was still around however I have been unable to find it for a long long time, I think it needs more availability and I believe that if someone were to offer it they would find the market for buyers very easily. Especially if it can be Şʸ𝐧ｔ𝔥є𝐒𝐢𝓏𝒆ⓓ in large quantity
Click to expand...
Yes, sadly MXĒ is no longer being made aside from some very small custom sŷnthš by very experienced çhëmîsts or leftover pre-ban from some smart SOB’s personal collection who foresaw the current supply/demand imbalance.

You say that if someone were to sŷnth it in large amounts, they’d easily find a market. That’s very likely unfortunately not true. At least not enough of a market to make the difficult, expensive (and dangerous) sŷnth anywhere near worth the risk. Someone would need a fully functioning łâb with lots of expensive glàşşwarè, fúmèhoòd, and dozens of appropriate tools.

The market for quasi-lègál díssòs is actually much smaller compared to what these Internet forums & rěddǐt would have you believe. I guarantee if you asked 100 people, at random if they knew what MXĒ was, 98 would have no clue, maybe 2 would say yes. Out of the 2 that actually knew what it was, maybe 1 would be willing to spend the (at minimum) $300+/g cost that it would undoubtedly go for.

Not to be a Debby downer, I absolutely used to LOVE MXĒ as well circa 2010’s when it was easy to come by. But it’s been near-extinct for at least close to a decade now, and I don’t foresee that changing anytime soon 😢.

-MB
 
Is it such a difficult and dangerous synth? I am a layman when it comes to chemistry these days, I have been intending to refresh myself on my basic chemistry but haven't lately.
 
Gulp2788 said:
Is it such a difficult and dangerous synth? I am a layman when it comes to chemistry these days, I have been intending to refresh myself on my basic chemistry but haven't lately.
Click to expand...
Dangerous in terms of the reagents needed to easily make it. You wouldn’t want to be messing with them in an under-ventilated area.

My understanding is that àrylcyclôhêxylaminès are all rather difficult synths that require very closely watched precûrşòrş.
 
That makes me sad, oh well, such is the way things go in this world. What are good alternatives? Anyone discovered anything that scratches that itch? I have tried some of the stuff currently being marketed but it's not as long-acting and doesn't quite hit that beautiful mind-body connection M used to. K is too short and tbh too pricey for what it is, plus part of what made M so interesting was the fact that it likely is less harmful to the bladder as K. Damn the lawmakers for deciding to outlaw it before it could be properly trialed.
 
Gulp2788 said:
That makes me sad, oh well, such is the way things go in this world. What are good alternatives? Anyone discovered anything that scratches that itch? I have tried some of the stuff currently being marketed but it's not as long-acting and doesn't quite hit that beautiful mind-body connection M used to. K is too short and tbh too pricey for what it is, plus part of what made M so interesting was the fact that it likely is less harmful to the bladder as K. Damn the lawmakers for deciding to outlaw it before it could be properly trialed.
Click to expand...
Never tried the og em ex ee to compare to but have you tried M×PeaÇPê@? I think Em Ex Ee is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇ€ whereas M×PeaÇPêã is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇPë@. From reports I've read it seems like generally when attached to the same group, Pë@Ç€ê's tend towards a more p$¥ç€dëliç hë@d$pâç€ whereas Pë@ÇPë@'s tend towards a more "füñçtï0ñâl/çlë@rh€@déd" headspace, so I would guess M×Pë@ÇPêã would be lacking in some of the depth/m@giç a lot of people reported with M×€ but may have similarities in other areas. Would guess it would be riskier to try to h0l€ on than M×£ too. My research on M×PÇPe@ has been pretty much entirely rëçrê@ti0ñ@l and not super dëëp or pr0f0und. Granted I've not pushed my page count too high but I found even a low page count of 3-H0-PeãÇPé@ to have a lot more dëpth than M×PÇPëã.

These are ones I've not personally researched but some people have mentioned 3-Më0-PÇ€ as having a similar "m@giç" to M×€ but that one's pretty hard to find and probably more $timul@tiñg and m@ñiç, riskier to h0l€ on than M×€. M×EyePeaAre, M×PeaAre, DM×€, and maybe H×€ were at points marketed as M×€ alternatives iirc, but unsure if that was just marketing hype/unsure how they compared to the og, and they aren't particularly easy to find anymore either.
 
jjjjjjjjj said:
Never tried the og em ex ee to compare to but have you tried M×PeaÇPê@? I think Em Ex Ee is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇ€ whereas M×PeaÇPêã is 3-Më0-20×0-PeaÇPë@. From reports I've read it seems like generally when attached to the same group, Pë@Ç€ê's tend towards a more p$¥ç€dëliç hë@d$pâç€ whereas Pë@ÇPë@'s tend towards a more "füñçtï0ñâl/çlë@rh€@déd" headspace, so I would guess M×Pë@ÇPêã would be lacking in some of the depth/m@giç a lot of people reported with M×€ but may have similarities in other areas. Would guess it would be riskier to try to h0l€ on than M×£ too. My research on M×PÇPe@ has been pretty much entirely rëçrê@ti0ñ@l and not super dëëp or pr0f0und. Granted I've not pushed my page count too high but I found even a low page count of 3-H0-PeãÇPé@ to have a lot more dëpth than M×PÇPëã.

These are ones I've not personally researched but some people have mentioned 3-Më0-PÇ€ as having a similar "m@giç" to M×€ but that one's pretty hard to find and probably more $timul@tiñg and m@ñiç, riskier to h0l€ on than M×€. M×EyePeaAre, M×PeaAre, DM×€, and maybe H×€ were at points marketed as M×€ alternatives iirc, but unsure if that was just marketing hype/unsure how they compared to the og, and they aren't particularly easy to find anymore either.
Click to expand...
I have tried ๓xp¢p, it is good and it has similar-ish features to it What risks do you think are there with it? I have pushed my page count quite high with it and been fine it seems very forgiving. 3 h0 sounds interesting it appears rare though maybe I ask a ᏉᏋᏁᎴᎧᏒ?
 
Gulp2788 said:
I have tried ๓xp¢p, it is good and it has similar-ish features to it What risks do you think are there with it? I have pushed my page count quite high with it and been fine it seems very forgiving. 3 h0 sounds interesting it appears rare though maybe I ask a ᏉᏋᏁᎴᎧᏒ?
Click to expand...
Re: m×pçp risks, I was mainly thinking in terms of in comparison to m×€ maybe a greater risk of m@ni@ pushing page count higher, though probably not a particularly high risk of that when compared to something like 3-h0 or 3-m€0 (though I've not tried 3-m€0 either, only 3-h0 and 3-m€, might try 3, 4 em dee in the future too).
 
Gulp2788 said:
That makes me sad, oh well, such is the way things go in this world. What are good alternatives? Anyone discovered anything that scratches that itch? I have tried some of the stuff currently being marketed but it's not as long-acting and doesn't quite hit that beautiful mind-body connection M used to. K is too short and tbh too pricey for what it is, plus part of what made M so interesting was the fact that it likely is less harmful to the bladder as K. Damn the lawmakers for deciding to outlaw it before it could be properly trialed.
Click to expand...
I’ve never tried the OG MX$ (regretfully) but I have tried DMX$ (which has been described as being somewhat akin to a “MX$ lite”) I found it to be very pleasant. Great immersion enhancement, and “holey” considering it trends toward being lightly to moderately stimulating. It also smells delicious (like blue candy). I’ve also read that that MXP$/MXIP$ are in the same ballpark and chemically it makes sense, though I’ve yet to try either of those two.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: whereas if I use fiat to buy something the money is green anyway. Monero does this really well. Anyway rant over, you can DM me if you'd like to talk more about cryptos.
  2. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: I don't really think that people understand the whole point of cryptos in the first place anymore. BTC just won't be adopted by governments because the transactions are too public and what's worse, money that is freshly minted is better than money that has been used. Like if my btc was used for something that was illegal does that mean the money is "poisoned"?
  3. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @xenxra Yeah, Like I said I've never really been that fond of btc, it isn't used as a currency, just as a place for people to invest money in, even though the whole purpose of btc was to be a currency. If it doesn't fulfill that role, what does? Monero certainly does.
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: What's good guys! Just got back home. Missing football today :( Fuck the probowl lol
  5. shoutback @ shoutback: Volkanovski is the greatest featherweight of all time. Better than Aldo or Holloway at their peaks.
  6. S @ sawganaut: I bet btc bottom is in
  7. D @ dragnetopher: No, I don’t think it. I know it. And it’s not just bitcoin, it’s all crypto. And like I said, they’re selling to acquire liquidity for when countries truly start utilizing what’s been set in place. The USD is under controlled demolition as we speak. This is all part of it.
  8. xenxra @ xenxra: there is no shortage of whales - https://tikolu.net/i/fmnru.png
  9. xenxra @ xenxra: tokenisation is not a plan its already been happening for months, ive been trading this whole move on silver through ethereum
  10. xenxra @ xenxra: you think whales are dumping bitcoin because of something everyone has known about for like 4 years? what does bitcoin liquidity have to do with trading tokenized assets? they don't have pooled liquidity.
  11. D @ dragnetopher: Whales are tanking BTC due to the fact that the future is coming now, literally. There’s a plan to tokenize every single asset possible. This is whales dumping so they can have liquidity for the Springtime.
  12. xenxra @ xenxra: @Gulp2788 this is a terrible spot to buy bitcoin haphazardly because it's going down another $5k -$7k if 80,000 doesn't hold. i told everyone to get the fuck out of bitcoin at $103k. it's better to buy late when the bottom is more certain than throw darts and act like the opposite outcome was unavoidable just because it went down "a lot" and everyone seems to be "freaking out". wait for it to get back over 85k
  13. xenxra @ xenxra: @aarons the last time i said monero was on discount in here it went up 5x in 3 months
  14. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: good opportunity to buy more btc if you are gonna do so imo, me I'm buying the btc to switch into better currencies
  15. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: bah politics, no need to worry BTC is a honeypot anyway
  16. fishladder @ fishladder: down since trump
  17. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: btc has been hovering around 90k for a year everyone is freaking out tbh I am laughing
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: Wow wasn't btc just at 120K or something?
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: Also 1.Usyk 2.Inoue 3.Crawford top 3 and anyone thinks anything else they are crazy
  20. shoutback @ shoutback: So what? No fight fans here?
Back
Top