American Research Chemicals

[Pan-Am_FltRsk]

they are ideal for me in many ways and really wish they pull through

I think we all agree with that sentiment. I am very much rooting for ARC. Have had many great interactions, packs always landed. But that's not the case as of recent, they've got to pull it together. I know it sounds rude, but I'm not into throwing hundreds of dollars away.

 

[Mikejrkcjr123]

Damn. I mean I’ve had contact with him but since other people haven’t gotten packs I’m going to stir clear for now best wishes

 

[Bzd321]

I ordered a mag of rilm on 5/6 and received it on 5/11. I emailed her and said it was decent, She responded with saying thank you very much, and that she's got some stuff going on. She is working on getting stuff back together. Overall 10/10, very nice, communication was fast, prices are good. I dont know what's going on right now, but I hope it clears up.

I'm a little confused with your timeline here??? It states, you are a new member as of may 25 of this year. However, you placed an order with them on 5/6. How did you know this vendor existed in how to get in touch with them? If you were not yet a member of dbg?

You could very well have a reasonable explanation that could be provide details or information that makes it possible for your timeline to make sense. But, uh, I would suggest to other members. To look at things like these regarding when members join and by if they put down specific order dates like this person did, which predates their even joining this forum. When I saw the timeline and realized the discrepancy, I immediately thought, wow, this is just an account. Created by the vendor or a friend of the vendor trying to make it look like people should still have some sort of faith in them. I apologize if I'm in the wrong here. But yeah, people use common sense before you believe reviews.Especially from very short term members. When I am going to use a vendor or considering it, I look for reviews from people who have been on the site four a minimum of one year, but 4 to 5 years is a hell of a lot better. I may not currently be a sponsor that just has to do with my financial situation. But I am I in touch, often with long term members, or I will simply say something on the thread. Regarding how good a vendor was, and I'll see some of the longer term people. Let's say awesome was way near back from you about that. Because no offense to newbies here, but yeah, you gotta earn your trust. So to any of you honest newbies, on here, I would tell you Look at reviews from the people who have been here for a while. I can't stress that enough . If you're gonna go spend five hundred dollars based on one or two reviews, it was used by people who have been on the site for a couple weeks to a month with a vendor who's got some sketchy shit going on, I would tell you, you should probably yeah, tighten up your research skills.

 

[bigblueallda]

I'm a little confused with your timeline here??? It states, you are a new member as of may 25 of this year. However, you placed an order with them on 5/6. How did you know this vendor existed in how to get in touch with them? If you were not yet a member of dbg?

You could very well have a reasonable explanation that could be provide details or information that makes it possible for your timeline to make sense. But, uh, I would suggest to other members. To look at things like these regarding when members join and by if they put down specific order dates like this person did, which predates their even joining this forum. When I saw the timeline and realized the discrepancy, I immediately thought, wow, this is just an account. Created by the vendor or a friend of the vendor trying to make it look like people should still have some sort of faith in them. I apologize if I'm in the wrong here. But yeah, people use common sense before you believe reviews.Especially from very short term members. When I am going to use a vendor or considering it, I look for reviews from people who have been on the site four a minimum of one year, but 4 to 5 years is a hell of a lot better. I may not currently be a sponsor that just has to do with my financial situation. But I am I in touch, often with long term members, or I will simply say something on the thread. Regarding how good a vendor was, and I'll see some of the longer term people. Let's say awesome was way near back from you about that. Because no offense to newbies here, but yeah, you gotta earn your trust. So to any of you honest newbies, on here, I would tell you Look at reviews from the people who have been here for a while. I can't stress that enough . If you're gonna go spend five hundred dollars based on one or two reviews, it was used by people who have been on the site for a couple weeks to a month with a vendor who's got some sketchy shit going on, I would tell you, you should probably yeah, tighten up your research skills.

I believe you can view "this suggest of suggest new rc vendors" subforum without an account or without being logged in.

 

[Bzd321]

I'm sorry. People, I just can't take this, and I can't keep my mouth shut any longer. Anybody that sends this person money right now, before they see ALL outstanding orders made up for, and made up for swiftly, in my opinion, not bright. I will always pay 2 to 3 times more for a subscription from a vendor who has consistent communication, , their responses and actions align very closely, and very few outstanding orders!!! Compared to a vendor who has had months of issues like this. All I see are excuses after excuses.After excuses and the saddest part is it looks like many of the customers are even making excuses for them as well. I'm sure some people will dislike/hate me for this comment, but I'm just trying to help you people out. Don't throw your fucking money away and give it to someone just because there's a chance they could pull their shut back together. Based on the comments I see in the last month to month and a 1/2 this vendor would have to pay me to accept anything from them; and, even then, considering their i believe someone called it " non existent opsec", I probably wouldn't even do that.

 

[Bzd321]

If you are correct, i guess that could make sense. Thank you for the information much appreciated. Although it would not change my mind to learning this vendor. I was just trying to help people understand that a lot of information can be extracted by looking at joining dates and order dates in addition to many other ways to gauge the accuracy of someone's review. If I had the time or energy to write a guidance regarding reviewer accuracy, or potential red flags too look for type of guidance, I would go ahead and do just that.