Best benzo RC chem

[offbrian6]

yes, can you give me a vendor that has good deals on good quality benzos. RC and RX

 

[Halif]

can you give me a vendor that has good deals on good quality benzos.

No. This is the thread for popping in, talking about highly desirable but hard to find benzos and saying how amazing they are until other users are salivating, and then dipping and never coming back to answer the 7 or 8 people who asked you where to get the good shit from. (apparently)

 

[LinaWade]

@LinaWade I noticed this I'll tag you may enjoy the author

@AlHoffman69

 

[dontdropit]

Who has that one?

Yeah is this a new one or a rarer one or one that isn't out there on the main stream yet? Or is it named differently? You were able to obtain it and observe its effects (I assume since you say it changed your outlook on benzos)??

 

[tiquanunderwood]

M3clon@z3pam might be my new favorite that's around now. Even though des@lk will always have a special place in my heart.

M3clon has been perfect for my GAD, and can be used to taper if needed. IME, it's pretty much 1:1 in terms of potency and half life to its parent compound.

 

[runbee]

M3clon@z3pam might be my new favorite that's around now. Even though des@lk will always have a special place in my heart.

M3clon has been perfect for my GAD, and can be used to taper if needed. IME, it's pretty much 1:1 in terms of potency and half life to its parent compound.

Who has this?

 

[tiquanunderwood]

Who has this?

Auto has US domestic powder.

 

[hexadeca]

Yeah I just prefer long half life benzos. That's why I like avizaf0n3 and br0m0nordi@zepam.

Dicl@zepam was great too.

Shorter half life, I would say flubromazolam, if dosed appropriately, with etizolam a close second as far as RCs go.

What are your thoughts on flvbrom@zepam? Half life of ~106 hours! (compared to Dicl@z at roughly 40 hours). It is the fluorinated version of the chlorine-based phen@zep@m (clobrom@zep@m), which is widely available and not currently scheduled except in Louisiana. Also, I think you can still find flubrom@zep@m if you look had enough.

and just FYI, Et!zol@m is in fact a presciption med in many countries including India, Japan, and several others. Brand names include Etil@@m, Etize5t, and some others. Just never marketed in the US for whatever reason. So i guess its not technically an "RC" but it ts one of my favorites too, the thienodi@zepine structure is interesting and should be explored more if it hasn;t been as much already. Tiz is similar, but obviously a shorter version kind of, of clon@zep@m/Klon0p!n to me, which is likely my favorite b3nz0 of the dozens I have had and/or researched lol

Chlordi@zep0xide (Rx name L!br!um, and the first b3nz0 ever invented, has a main metabolite called desmethyIdi@zep@m, which has a half-life ranging up to 200 hours!! its nuts. I diont think its ever been isolated/synthed for resale though or would even be worth it

 

[hexadeca]

Hey all I was going to start my own post but seen this and figured I'd post in here. I currently read brom@z but it just doesn't seem to be what it used to be. I could read 2-4 mgs but then all of a sudden it started to take like 6-8 mgs for the same quality of reading.

My question is what could I potentially replace brom@z with that's somewhat similar to the original stuff. Something that is currently readily available.

I am mostly studying the social anxiety relief and not too worried about euphoria but a little bit of euphoria wouldn't hurt. I've been looking at etizolam, the new eythlbrom, or flubrotiz. Would any of these be worth trying out. I don't exactly have a ton of money to spend on a bunch of other compounds and worried that if I buy something other than bromaz I'll get ill readings.

Thanks in advance to anyone who has any suggestions or insight.

@timmytimbers my theory is that Clobro/phn@z and possibly ethyl-brom@zol@m came out much earlier than most people think, and most sources started using it instead of Brom@zoI@m without saying anything for about a year or 2. Everyone knew brom@z was going to get scheduled asap and so they started switching early to see if people would notice. Tinkering with d0ses, mixing two diffferent things, etc. People did and eventually enough complaints finally made the largest svppliers finally admit that it was no longer actual brom@z but was clobro/phen@zep@m and then ethyl-br0m. the period where everone started feeling like brom@z became weaker was when they either were purposefully putting in less to conserve their stock and make it last lomger OR 2.) still hadnt figured out an appropriate dose of clobro/phenaz or a mixture of a couple different ones to properly mimic brom@z.

Because when I first took Brom@z, as someone who could read 6-8mags of @lpr@z or close to 2mags of C-Lam without blacking out, (the time when Clon@zoI@m and Flvbr0m@zoI@m were at their peak in popularity so toler@nces were skyhigh, even just that first time of reading only 4mags of brom@z put a massive smile on my face. I got the red mags that had "Brom@z" stamped on the cover (and the yellow mags tht said "CLAM" on the cover, purplish grey Flvbr0, orange D!cl@z, blue with "ET!Z", etc... from the single best RC b3nz0 source of all time (RIP B.S.??) -- and i instantly knew that I loved it. it was excellent. not as much as Et!z, but it was a near perfect balance of functional/evphoric/inhibit3d/relaxed while being able to tell if you were about to go too far.

Around mid-2024 a certain svpplier had a "weak b@tch" that was so uncommon for them that it didnt even affect their rep. They fixed it next round a few weeks later and mostly back to normal for a short period, but then it started more and more with all of them. So I think that's when they started saying ok were starting to make the switch, etc. Because they didnt have the reserves on hand as control got tighter and tighter on it. Thats just my theory though. Because even from the same people who i know usedd to have the real deal, "good" br0m@z, it wasnt ever the same again and still isnt. This could either be from 1.) purposefully mislabeling it as Br0maz, knowing its not, or 2.) it could be that they were/are having to rely on less skilled cl@ndest!ne ch3m!sts and harder routes of synthe5!5 that would end with impure product, meaning not only weaker, but synthe5!5 byproducts of random metabolites, "half-complete" b3nz0 structures.. for a lack of a better term ..being the impurities, making the effects less desirable..

I wouldnt bet my life on this theory/theories by any means, but it seems like that may be kind of how it played out at least in part. Because ~2019-2023 br0m@z makes almost all of today's "Br0m@z" look like Som@ or something.

 

[jillybeans]

M3clon@z3pam might be my new favorite that's around now. Even though des@lk will always have a special place in my heart.

M3clon has been perfect for my GAD, and can be used to taper if needed. IME, it's pretty much 1:1 in terms of potency and half life to its parent compound.

Interesting i havnt heard many opinions on this one yet and have been waiting before hitting go. I’ve always preferred when it comes to rx clon. over something like x@n@x. Maybe I’ll give it a try. So in rc’s it prob would be an interesting one for me. Thanks for the input!

 

[tiquanunderwood]

Interesting i havnt heard many opinions on this one yet and have been waiting before hitting go. I’ve always preferred when it comes to rx clon. over something like x@n@x. Maybe I’ll give it a try. So in rc’s it prob would be an interesting one for me. Thanks for the input!

For me it's almost a 1:1 to cl0n@z3p@m. Good to have on hand for taper if needed as well.