Fluonitazene

[bigjackchen]

Fluonitazene

N,N-diethyl-2-(2-(4-fluorobenzyl)-5-nitro-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)ethan-1-amine

Chemical Formula: C20H23FN4O2

Molecular Weight: 370.43

Exact  mass:370.18

Accept reservation.

Wholesale inquries: admin@theresearchchemsclub.com

 

[RC_researcher79]

I had a long discussion about this yet another one etonitazene analogue.

The data on wiki are not correct. You can verify the information on a paper wrote in 1933 about those compounds.
It's really hard to make a proper guess, but after some discussions and check of other papers, the out come will be:

Best case: a 5x-10x potency compound. If recreational or not, still unknown. Only Etazene and Metonitazene share the same structure with Etonitazene. 

Worst case: < 1x morphine / 1/16x morphine , aka total trash.

There are not way atm to find out. We need to wait the first reports.

 

[bigjackchen]

@RC_researcher79 During that time our mail system was being updated.

 

[mistabenzo]

hey chen how you been bro

 

[Decredulous]

I had a long discussion about this yet another one etonitazene analogue.

The data on wiki are not correct. You can verify the information on a paper wrote in 1933 about those compounds.
It's really hard to make a proper guess, but after some discussions and check of other papers, the out come will be:

Best case: a 5x-10x potency compound. If recreational or not, still unknown. Only Etazene and Metonitazene share the same structure with Etonitazene. 

Worst case: < 1x m0rphine / 1/16x m0rphine , aka total trash.

There are not way atm to find out. We need to wait the first reports.cccccccccccccccc

I just posted a long comment about this, etaz3n/etod3s, and met0/metod3s briefly explaining the current state of knowledge on potency & activity of the novel benzimidazole opioids.

My worst-case scenario is like Jack's -- flu0 is equipotent to cl0nitazene (~1/5 as strong as morphine) / metod3snitazene (<50%) morphine. This would be a likely case, but I have not seen this 1933 paper you refer to? I've seen the original 1950's German language papers with all the tables of different substituents comparative potencies vs. m0rphine? Do you have a PDF?

 

[RC_researcher79]

Saw the few PDFs, still not enough evidences.

But definitely m3toDESnitazene is worthless. Clo0itazene was 3x, Fluo I've received some reports, orally the BA is practically inactive. But it seems that Smoked/IV is effective.

M3tonitazene potency has been confirmed as expected  (40-50x), it's longer legs than Etazene, but more sedative (similar to Iso). IV it gives some more rush tough. I'm not going to research M3tonitazene anyway, I had enough of strong compounds fucking up my tolerance not giving the same great pleasure of f-analogues. Just ordered some Proglumide to drop as much as possible my tolerance to research upcoming interesting compounds.

3tazene is an exception, but i'm waiting the chinese batch, the EU etazene is really having a lot of issues and purity is always different, other than the prices out of mind for the 45 mins duration.

I just hope to see as next fluorphen / acetylmorphone / good Mephedridine or Pethidine analogues.