Is Money Gram putting names of senders and receivers in a black list?

Alfapharm

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
654
Does Money Gram have a black list for receivers and senders? Any observation after aproximately what amount a name hits their red button?

Had bad experience with Western Union, obviously they do have a black list.

 
The very first time I used Moneygram in person to what was supposed to be a new receiver, they denied me.  I tried three different places with three different receivers, tried sending a lower amount, tried sending two transactions with lower amounts and was still denied.  It was the very first time I used Moneygram so I couldn't have been on a blacklist, so it must have been the receiver or I have read it might be just the region.  They advised me to call so I did and they asked me if I knew the person and I said yes, it was a friend of my brother's and they still denied me.  It was very strange because I hear so many people use them and it goes through.  I won't use them anymore.  My blood pressure can't take it.   Sharemoney, on the other hand, loves me but you must give a ton of personal information which makes me very uncomfortable.  I hope this sort of answers your question.  At least it was my anecdotal experience.

 
@Handsley Thanks for sharing your experience. You just had bad luck with the receiver. 

This souns to me clearly that the receiver' name was in the black list so you couldn't do anything. But MG remains a stable payment method and from some countries one can send a MG online or by phone, that easy. Also I heard it's possible to send MG by using Bitcoins. 

Somebody knows who offers such service?

 
Blacklisting receivers is definitely a thing MG engages in, but I'm wondering if anyone knows anything about senders.

I've only used MG for donations, usually to flagged countries and to several blacklisted receivers.  The past several times I've tried to use their services, it has resulted in more than the usual 'my donation is on hold' NBD response.  The last time (because I'm not dumping cash like that again) they had me re-confirm it after two separate phone calls, give a new number to my receiver, then marked it immediately as received while I was still on the phone.  The receiver said he was told there was no such number when he went later, but there was a new person there.  I'm afraid they're using my donations as a way to identify others.

I stopped using them completely and switched to places that could take card, but now that my site is having issues, I'm back to wondering if this is something anyone else has dealt with and how they got around it.

 
Recently had issues with mg too. Back to back, either unable to pick up or was put on hold/frozen. Got refunded and now crossing them off my list as a service to use. Also no reason, I didn't ask many questions though as I had a hard time understanding the correspondent on the phone.

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. st1ckyf1ng4z @ st1ckyf1ng4z: @MorfineOrfan @nameofuser11 @RiftChems @moai Just because they’re “banning/scheduling” something, doesn’t mean it’s not gonna be available. If you know where to look, it won’t be a problem.
  2. T @ theweedman: hellooo everyone! hola! salut!
  3. MrFuszy @ MrFuszy: Hello yall
  4. AlHoffman69 @ AlHoffman69: back stvthgd
  5. Acidwizard @ Acidwizard: Terrific Tuesday Everyone!
  6. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Happy Monday!
  7. AlHoffman69 @ AlHoffman69: TADYA IS THE AYH STAHY THHD
  8. nameofuser11 @ nameofuser11: Set a reasonable limit. Hell fucking make it like buying cold medicine where they swipe your id and you can't get a bunch. But we know this isn't about logic or public safety. It's about money and control.
  9. nameofuser11 @ nameofuser11: AKA are such a bunch of fucking capitalist traitors. The liquor lobby has a lot of money in this as well.
  10. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: The major plain leaf companies and the AKA are the ones lobbying against 7 and the other semi-sythetic derivatives, mgm this that and the other. We all know the chemist are just gonna mess with the scaffolding of the compounds and come out with new and even better semi-sythetic alkoloids of kratom. They are already playing with cats-claw
  11. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: @moai just asked chatgpeetea and it looks like plain leaf kratom is safe, they arent banning it. Just 7-Hydroxymitragynine, MGM15 ,16 , and pseudoindoxyl
  12. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: Wait... @moai they are federally banning plain leaf kratom too???
  13. moai @ moai: @MorphineOrfan how fucking stupid is this shit. We better see some new shit come out, I’m most upset about banning regular kratom because really? Millions of people have got off hard opioids with it. They must want everyone on methadone instead.
  14. F @ frankie dicks: Gil
  15. F @ frankie dicks: Ghb
  16. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: If bans were done to logic so much of what is illegal now would end up prescription only and I think the powers that be react faster than they think... if they think at all
  17. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: They aren't specifically targeting SR and 7oh
  18. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: @RiftChems well sr-17018 is an orphine analogue after all, and they are banning all orphines so that makes sense. Orphines are spiking the OD death rates majorly these past few months.
  19. AlHoffman69 @ AlHoffman69: CANDYMAN ramnemnber thta is will be conme relevenaent soon :alien: :cool: :cool: :cool: 🤑
  20. RiftChems @ RiftChems: crazy they are banning SR17018 at the same time. they know what theyre doing.
Back
Top