Is Money Gram putting names of senders and receivers in a black list?

Alfapharm

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
654
Does Money Gram have a black list for receivers and senders? Any observation after aproximately what amount a name hits their red button?

Had bad experience with Western Union, obviously they do have a black list.

 
The very first time I used Moneygram in person to what was supposed to be a new receiver, they denied me.  I tried three different places with three different receivers, tried sending a lower amount, tried sending two transactions with lower amounts and was still denied.  It was the very first time I used Moneygram so I couldn't have been on a blacklist, so it must have been the receiver or I have read it might be just the region.  They advised me to call so I did and they asked me if I knew the person and I said yes, it was a friend of my brother's and they still denied me.  It was very strange because I hear so many people use them and it goes through.  I won't use them anymore.  My blood pressure can't take it.   Sharemoney, on the other hand, loves me but you must give a ton of personal information which makes me very uncomfortable.  I hope this sort of answers your question.  At least it was my anecdotal experience.

 
@Handsley Thanks for sharing your experience. You just had bad luck with the receiver. 

This souns to me clearly that the receiver' name was in the black list so you couldn't do anything. But MG remains a stable payment method and from some countries one can send a MG online or by phone, that easy. Also I heard it's possible to send MG by using Bitcoins. 

Somebody knows who offers such service?

 
Blacklisting receivers is definitely a thing MG engages in, but I'm wondering if anyone knows anything about senders.

I've only used MG for donations, usually to flagged countries and to several blacklisted receivers.  The past several times I've tried to use their services, it has resulted in more than the usual 'my donation is on hold' NBD response.  The last time (because I'm not dumping cash like that again) they had me re-confirm it after two separate phone calls, give a new number to my receiver, then marked it immediately as received while I was still on the phone.  The receiver said he was told there was no such number when he went later, but there was a new person there.  I'm afraid they're using my donations as a way to identify others.

I stopped using them completely and switched to places that could take card, but now that my site is having issues, I'm back to wondering if this is something anyone else has dealt with and how they got around it.

 
Recently had issues with mg too. Back to back, either unable to pick up or was put on hold/frozen. Got refunded and now crossing them off my list as a service to use. Also no reason, I didn't ask many questions though as I had a hard time understanding the correspondent on the phone.

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: whereas if I use fiat to buy something the money is green anyway. Monero does this really well. Anyway rant over, you can DM me if you'd like to talk more about cryptos.
  2. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: I don't really think that people understand the whole point of cryptos in the first place anymore. BTC just won't be adopted by governments because the transactions are too public and what's worse, money that is freshly minted is better than money that has been used. Like if my btc was used for something that was illegal does that mean the money is "poisoned"?
  3. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: @xenxra Yeah, Like I said I've never really been that fond of btc, it isn't used as a currency, just as a place for people to invest money in, even though the whole purpose of btc was to be a currency. If it doesn't fulfill that role, what does? Monero certainly does.
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: What's good guys! Just got back home. Missing football today :( Fuck the probowl lol
  5. shoutback @ shoutback: Volkanovski is the greatest featherweight of all time. Better than Aldo or Holloway at their peaks.
  6. S @ sawganaut: I bet btc bottom is in
  7. D @ dragnetopher: No, I don’t think it. I know it. And it’s not just bitcoin, it’s all crypto. And like I said, they’re selling to acquire liquidity for when countries truly start utilizing what’s been set in place. The USD is under controlled demolition as we speak. This is all part of it.
  8. xenxra @ xenxra: there is no shortage of whales - https://tikolu.net/i/fmnru.png
  9. xenxra @ xenxra: tokenisation is not a plan its already been happening for months, ive been trading this whole move on silver through ethereum
  10. xenxra @ xenxra: you think whales are dumping bitcoin because of something everyone has known about for like 4 years? what does bitcoin liquidity have to do with trading tokenized assets? they don't have pooled liquidity.
  11. D @ dragnetopher: Whales are tanking BTC due to the fact that the future is coming now, literally. There’s a plan to tokenize every single asset possible. This is whales dumping so they can have liquidity for the Springtime.
  12. xenxra @ xenxra: @Gulp2788 this is a terrible spot to buy bitcoin haphazardly because it's going down another $5k -$7k if 80,000 doesn't hold. i told everyone to get the fuck out of bitcoin at $103k. it's better to buy late when the bottom is more certain than throw darts and act like the opposite outcome was unavoidable just because it went down "a lot" and everyone seems to be "freaking out". wait for it to get back over 85k
  13. xenxra @ xenxra: @aarons the last time i said monero was on discount in here it went up 5x in 3 months
  14. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: good opportunity to buy more btc if you are gonna do so imo, me I'm buying the btc to switch into better currencies
  15. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: bah politics, no need to worry BTC is a honeypot anyway
  16. fishladder @ fishladder: down since trump
  17. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: btc has been hovering around 90k for a year everyone is freaking out tbh I am laughing
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: Wow wasn't btc just at 120K or something?
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: Also 1.Usyk 2.Inoue 3.Crawford top 3 and anyone thinks anything else they are crazy
  20. shoutback @ shoutback: So what? No fight fans here?
Back
Top