Medixo Hemofarm Lorazepam

[Izzyhuahua]

...and FTIR means jack unless you couple it with GC, and I have a hard time given his LinkdIn that he's made the foray into FTIR, much less GC-FTIR
Source: 26 years in the pharmaceutical industry.

 

[Izzyhuahua]

They are a harm reduction company. It tells me not to buy from this vendor. There is more paperwork that came with this, the main point tells me I am buying sugar. I'll even get another lab if that helps your sceptisim. I could care less about the cost tbh.

Care to share it? Interested in whether the lab report misspelled any words other than "posative." Also, I wouldn't mind picking it apart.

 

[davemustaine]

Care to share it? Interested in whether the lab report misspelled any words other than "posative." Also, I wouldn't mind picking it apart.

That's a clerk, the labs are run at an entirely different location. No, I'm not interested in discussing anything further at this point. It's very clear your intent.

I know what magz are supposed to feel like and this had absolutely zero effect. As mentioned before, I went out of my way to try and figure out what's in these things. I can tell you this with a 100% certainty, all lab results aside.. what I received fake and not at all the magz they are supposed to be. Nuff said.

 

[Izzyhuahua]

That's a clerk, the labs are run at an entirely different location. No, I'm not interested in discussing anything further at this point. It's very clear your intent.

I know what magz are supposed to feel like and this had absolutely zero effect. As mentioned before, I went out of my way to try and figure out what's in these things. I can tell you this with a 100% certainty, all lab results aside.. what I received fake and not at all the magz they are supposed to be. Nuff said.

"That's a clerk." Courts have clerks. Never heard of a lab having a clerk.

"the labs are run at an entirely different location." No, they're really not. Clinical labs, yes. Forensic labs, absolutely not.

Stop pretending to know what you're talking about. You aren't doing yourself any favors.

 

[aenima1336]

Izzy I(and I think many others to)respect you and your work in the pharmaceutical sector and I see you have a lot of knowledge and even more expertise. So I get your point. And it's good. Do you maybe have something/someone where a sample could be tested? I'd also rather see the work of a true professional over the work of a side business.

But since many people had adverse effects, I also get their point. And I think that counts at this point.
They may not know how to do a proper analysis, but people know how the effects of their DOC is and this goes hand in hand with the result of that analysis, even if the substances, percentages etc would be false.

So if you(or someone else)can't provide a professional analysis, with a sample of that users batch, we certainly will never know what and how much it is.

 

[peanut]

Curious, what exactly do you believe this one page tells you? FTIR (at least in terms of how you're intending to apply it) is meaningless unless coupled with GC. It's.primary use us as an ID test for resins. I've been a phama executive for over 20 years and before transitioning to the C-suite, I was a lab rat putting in my time developing and validating analytical methods. Care to share your full report with Materials & Methods, sample prep, system suitability results pre- and post- run of your sample series? I'll take a little time out of my busy day and return a verdict as to whether the outcome of your analysis is legit or pure bunk.

Oh and my the way, TN Scientific is not a a clinical laboratory. It' one of these commercial "labs" that makes a living by duping folks that don't know any better. It's not registered with FDA or CLIA, and It is not accredited or recognized by literally anyone for executing forensic analysis. I can promise you, the legitimate analysis you THOUGHT you were having carried out costs WAY MORE than $200.

Why do people use this lab then?

 

[porkandbeansboy]

Here ya go. Bella's Hemofarm Loraz-a-pam. I spent quite a bit for a few bags of sugar I could have picked up at the supermarket. I will not be ordering from her again.


View attachment 4117

I'm confused is "all" that supposed to be in these alleged fake lorazepam presses cuz it says it contains MDMA if I'm not mistaken and it says "Heroin Base" It makes zero sense from a financial gain to add either of those substances to a fake press especially a fake lorazepam press.

I mean if it contained other RC benzos that provide a similar effect to lorazepam but considering they cost much cheaper when acquired in bulk, than that would make sense.... but what I'm reading is confusing me lol, am I missing something?

 

[davemustaine]

I'm confused is "all" that supposed to be in these alleged fake lorazepam presses cuz it says it contains MDMA if I'm not mistaken and it says "Heroin Base" It makes zero sense from a financial gain to add either of those substances to a fake press especially a fake lorazepam press.

I mean if it contained other RC benzos that provide a similar effect to lorazepam but considering they cost much cheaper when acquired in bulk, than that would make sense.... but what I'm reading is confusing me lol, am I missing something?

The Sidenifil makes sense to me because this particular mag was sitting next to another that was viagra. Idk, but for my own sanity here.. I have another lab I am using and will post those results. I assure you, I don’t want to throw out what I don’t have to. But so far, I haven’t taken anymore.

 

[aenima1336]

How much do you have to pay per analysis?
Maybe some members who are interested aswell would donate a few dollars for doing us that favor?

 

[knofflebon]

Well the paperwork shown says that neither high or low match scores guarantee that a possible match is present, though they did seem to confirm alpha lactose.

Sure, the lab analysis is far from precise on the composition of the sample, and several of the possible cuts would not make sense. It’s notable that NONE of the possible matches were the advertised mag though.

I think that what trumps this is the effects felt by the reviewer who I (though I’m a rando and my opinion is just that) assume is acting in good faith and is familiar with the effects of the genuine mag.

I’m also curious as to why the vendor wouldn’t give a straight answer when asked about the composition.

Either way, even the most stellar vendors may cut corners here and there, or be scammed with bunk product from their suppliers, or maybe even done dirty by one of their own employees, etc etc.

If the vendor is starting to get shady, they’re not going to be able to hide it forever. If it’s a fluke, or if the recipient is mistaken/lying, one bad review is not going to assassinate the vendor’s character.

No need to get derisive on either side.