Moneygram Problems

386dc said:
they put the firstname and 1st last name, they forgot the 2nd lastname i said go put the 2nd last name and it was blocked, so you think maybe it was the reciver not the sender? i already requested a new reciever name and got one
Click to expand...
Yes, that indeed sounds like a receiver problem to me. I presume that changing the receiver at this point will be difficult, if not impossible. Canceling the transaction and obtaining a refund would, in my mind, be the preferred course of action. If MG balks in any way, you might consider sending 99 Luftballons a PM, as he has some recent experience dealing with such matters and may be able to provide some guidance.

 
Sexy Beast? That's you my brother!

sexywookiebubblebath_616.jpg


 
Did they give you a number for the "FBI"? did you Google it? what did it say?

 
Vendors need to have about 10 receivers. What do they expect when they have 1-3 and they are being sent 10k a day. LE is slow if they were not on this faster IMHO.

Also, I am not so sure they were not just trying to scare you. Not like LE to make you aware that they are looking into you until they have what they want.

That would be like a ninja telling you they are a ninja...just doesn't happen. You realize they are ninja when you are holding your entrails.

 
99 Luftballons said:
Vendors need to have about 10 receivers. What do they expect when they have 1-3 and they are being sent 10k a day. LE is slow if they were not on this faster IMHO.

Also, I am not so sure they were not just trying to scare you. Not like LE to make you aware that they are looking into you until they have what they want.

That would be like a ninja telling you they are a ninja...just doesn't happen. You realize they are ninja when you are holding your entrails.
Click to expand...
Well, there ARE exceptions to that rule. Like Wookies for instance. We'll be glad to tell you that we're going to rip your arms off in advance, yet the outcome remains the same! /default_laugh.png

 
Jewbacca said:
Please don't interpret my comments as a recommendation to NOT seek legal counsel or to NOT take precautionary measures on all matters IT related. Just pointing out that from a criminal defense perspective, making preemptive telephone calls to answer unasked questions is generally not the preferred strategy.
Click to expand...
very well understood, i guess i jumped to worst case scenario.  Big Brother is always watching and I always try to eliminate things that I could have done in order to prevent an unfortunate outcome.  Thanks again for your insight.

 
Something HAIRY might be a foot?

 
hobbit.jpg


/default_blink.png

I'm glad these aren't my feet.  

I bet Jewy's feet look much better!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Denise said:
Something HAIRY might be a foot?

 
hobbit.jpg


/default_blink.png

I'm glad these aren't my feet.  

I bet Jewy's feet look much better!
Click to expand...
Have to say, I thought those were a shot of J-bacca's feet.  /default_ohmy.png

 
I have not placed an order from an SY vendor in a couple of years. I recently went to wire money using MoneyGram at an in-person location (a latino market) using ficticious sender information on the form just as I used to, and the clerk asked for an ID. The amount was under $250. I questioned this and she pointed to a poster affixed to the inside of the glass which appeared to be printed by the federal government and specified that an ID must be provided. They also wanted my social security number and occupation. I took back the form and left. Is this the new standard practice for senders at MoneyGram? Or was this just the policy of that location? Has anyone else had this experience? Should I switch to Western Untion?

Thanks in advance.

 
I had just had a problem where I wanted a refund and needed to show ID for that. Luckily I had ID matching the names. Warning to anyone who may not use a name that can be accompanied by ID. Had this happend on earlier tranx I would have been out the $, as I would not have had proof (ID) that I was the sender.

But I've never been asked for ID arbitrarily like that before when I was sending small amounts. I know under a 1000 they aren't supposed to ask, but everyong knows that, and I'm sure that you do too. 

Jewy offers some info about the whole money sending thing in the sales-meds page

'&do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>>

Are the clerks allowed to just ask at random if they feel something is off? I'd be interested to know if we're really just more paranoid or if they are starting to infringe on our lawful anonymity? (I use lawful but I use it not actaully knowing if anonymity is truly lawful of not, just FYI)

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. JustChiilin @ JustChiilin: Just hearing of R.. Is there a thread or post of what happened?
  2. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: domestic p1ns are harder and harder to come by which sucks and when I find them, they're so expensive
  3. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: me too. sad to see and hear but honestly when R told me he was serving 6,000 people, I knew it was a matter of time
  4. C @ Charizard179: Still pisses me off, common folk need subscriptions for anxiety etc, while the “big dogs” at the top are obviously subscribed out of their minds on high energy shit
  5. C @ Charizard179: Domestic only for a while. Should be fine
  6. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: so anything I get coming to me from outside the country will be inspected regardless if it looks sus or not
  7. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: I've been flagged and sent a love letter a long time ago for an international shipment
  8. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: doubtful, unless international
  9. C @ Charizard179: Possibilities of getting red flagged etc
  10. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: right but you're fine
  11. C @ Charizard179: Small fish, 1 time subscriber…shit still sucks
  12. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: they want big fish
  13. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: Unless you're a big buyer they don't give a care
  14. L @ Lonertool: Everything is up in the air until we have definitive proof of C let not put that energy in the air! let all just do our part and chill out. Things will settle eventually RESPECT to everyone here of course the important thing is to make sure we all practice great OPSEC and support each other in this time.
  15. Wicked @ Wicked: Monero isn’t a bad idea imo. I’ve asked a few times to use it and been denied actually
  16. M @ Mammasboi123: There’s been some rule
  17. P @ ProtekPhilipe: Should vendors here start prioritizing monero for payment? And maybe show site links for sponsored member threads only. It's a tiny defense, but any way to stay lower key would help right now
  18. etizoman @ etizoman: God fucking dann. Just read the article. Definitely RIP to their normal lives ever again. Both C and R were Amazing people and have provided a lot of great times and some personal wisdom thru their products. And what @Wicked said, its true, man. Sucks you gotta kinda be paranoid when you reach a certain level of status....
  19. Wicked @ Wicked: I agree, it’s unfortunate and a loss for many of us, you’re right R was one of the best. Hopefully it serves as a reminder to others to always stay on top of things. I’m sure it’s easy to get comfortable and feel unstoppable when you reach a certain level as an author
  20. ms3031 @ ms3031: Its unfortunate for everyone but tbh, as with most things illegal, they eventually fall either by their own hand or LE, there are some rare success people but whose to say who is working with authorities and who is not. In fact thjs entire forum creates an easy access to the people they want just a much as we want them. Nothing can be done for those who fly too close to the sun.
Back
Top