New stimulant DCC. Any info?

I should have some of this as a sample from them in a couple weeks. I don't know if I'll do anything with it but send it to a lab for identification because there is no cas number listed or even a chemical formula.

I'm sure some experience reports will be showing up in the near future. But without even a chemical structure I won't be rolling the dice on this one.

 
I should have some of this as a sample from them in a couple weeks. I don't know if I'll do anything with it but send it to a lab for identification because there is no cas number listed or even a chemical formula.

I'm sure some experience reports will be showing up in the near future. But without even a chemical structure I won't be rolling the dice on this one.
Have you used them before? I've been wondering how legit they are as I've heard mixed reports.

 
Have you used them before? I've been wondering how legit they are as I've heard mixed reports.
I've used them twice with a long break in between.  Both packages arrived and they were accommodating on my second order.

However I ordered a substantial quantity of etizolam, Metizolam and flualprazolam that were sent to DrugsData for testing.  Despite all three having distinct physical properties, the etizolam and Metizolam being white extremely crystaline, almost to the point of sandy like and crunchy, and the flualprazolam being white fluffy powder that tends to clump together, different melting properties (I've never seen etizolam melt into a running bluish purple color that is harsh to inhale, etizolam always clear until overheated and ran from the flame on foil with a slightly sweet taste) all came back as Etizolam according to DrugsData.org.

I haven't followed up with a second opinion test yet, but I fear there was a mistake in labeling on my end or processing on their end.  I prepared five samples to be tested, all individually labeled and enclosed in their own envelope packed inside of one priority mail envelope.  It costly mistake however you look at it though.

 
Interesting findings. I think I'll wait for more reports before I consider ordering this. I've been waiting ages for them to restock some stims before doing a test order!

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. R @ rhodium: @Swabbindex dm
  2. Swabbindex @ Swabbindex: Anyone best source for G
  3. 1018ei @ 1018ei: anymore canuck vendors out thereee ~^_^?
  4. Swabbindex @ Swabbindex: Best source for GHB or GBL? 😊
  5. R @ Royboy99: @sleepyjoefan, ask him bro. If you are talking about Jax, nice dude and will give it to you straight. :D
  6. S @ sleepyjoefan: what is shipping time like for jack?
  7. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Seahawks going to win this but it would be a great comeback story for the patriots and a monster play for maye and the squad
  8. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good Morning everyone
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: Coach will get Woolen straightened out.
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: Yessir but I think he may have matured and he is showing steadiness during crunch time. All you can ask of anyone. He has answered the call so far.
  11. M @ meepmoopmeep: Darnold sometimes does Darnold things but otherwise a skilled QB
  12. M @ meepmoopmeep: @shoutback he seriously needs to be benched for being a jackass who almost cost the seahawks the game
  13. shoutback @ shoutback: @meepmoopmeep that Woolen situation was atrocious
  14. shoutback @ shoutback: 2018 draft
  15. shoutback @ shoutback: At least football is something we all can agree on. I'm happy for Darnold. Crazy to think he is the 1st of that 2018 to make it to the SB
  16. shoutback @ shoutback: Squack Squack mfers lol j/k but yeah go fucking Seahawks!
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: sad that the rams aren’t advancing but saw it coming from a mile away. go seahawks!
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: GO HAWKS!
  19. L @ Layne_Cobain: Stidham played well enuff to win until that late pick that ended it ;( hate the pats hope Sammy and the Seahawks can handle em that defense is fierce but the offense isn’t as explosive as the rams and obviously he ain’t the caliber of Matthew stafford but anyways, go Hawks!!!
  20. M @ meepmoopmeep: But the hawks played better and earned their SB spot
Back
Top