Rarechems/Freshchems

Wanted to update everyone (as I said I would) that my order was as pure as advertised. There was no noticeable difference compared to BJC before he stopped carrying the RC that I ordered from Rarechems btw.

 
So far mine is a no show..  I knew that i shouldn't of gotten my hopes up after receiving my first pack from them this year in a record time of 5 working days.

Ordered on 23/08
Shipped on 25/08 
Nothing yet..

While it's absolutely on me to have expected that trend to continue, it still hurts.. Though there's still hope because it has been 18 working days and i've had packs land after the 2 month mark but that was with full blown covid. We'll see.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Update on my pack: 

Processed 9/5

Shipped 9/7

Touchdown 9/21

I’d given up hope that it would show, especially since I’d been spoiled by 7 day touchdowns in July and August. Once again, I think their stealth is top notch and the reason why packs continue to land. I will say anticipate longer landing times and plan accordingly. 

 
Remember my earlier post stating that it beats buying scratch-offs..  

 I would confidently buy said scratch-off from Rare, all day every day.  

Just throwing that out there.  I cringe when I see customers from certain areas putting the blame on them.  Same with a couple of other outfits.  Any risk is explicitly stated, and agreed to by customer.  

*Not directed at anyone in particular, just a friendly reminder.  Most participants in this thread seem pretty savvy.

Rare has always been tops in my book.

 
SensoryDeprived said:
@Scottydoesntknow What do you mean by scratch-offs? Sorry i probably missed your earlier posts.
Click to expand...
I just mean that when someone  is purchasing research materials, that person is making a choice to gamble, whether they realize it or not.  In the US, one can go into nearly any convenience store and purchase "scratch-off" lottery tickets and take their chances.   Some have better odds than others..  

Regarding the acquisition of research materials online, one is always taking a chance.  Sometimes because of a source that cannot be trusted, sometimes due to happenings beyond any control (mail, custom, human error) and sometimes a combination of all.

My reference was just to point out that odds are certainly in your favor if utilizing a quality source such as Rare for research materials, as they have gone above and beyond to do their part to ensure maximum chance of success, ime.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SensoryDeprived said:
Well according to the shipping section on their website you do have tracking as an option for US.
Click to expand...
It says that on the shipping section, but when you go to check out its not an option.  Can only do untracked to US.  Thats why they have that whole spiel about re-shippers on the front page.

 
Crap. Just when I finally decide to order 2fdck from them. I find out it has been banned in Germany, with a lot of other stuff, and they no longer offer it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
dn4000 said:
Gonna join y'all in trying them out now after the update. I had only ever ordered from smokeys. Got 3 for 3 from them. Was always tempted to try rarechems but didn't wanna try something when I know smokey's works, but they won't ship some of the stuff I want whereas rarechems will. Trying to get some 3-MMC and 2-FMA and hoping it all works out. Will update.
Click to expand...
Just updating that I still haven't received this pack that I ordered. It was updated to shipped on 09/06. It wouldn't surprise me if it still showed up or if it got snatched up due to the contents of the order. I could see it going either way. I would like to comment that regardless of the outcome, since placing this order, I have also placed and received an order from Smokey's. I really do hope I can get packs from Rarechems because I get a better vibe from their quality. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. My order is definitely more seizeable than some others might be, but I'm just hoping it's running late.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. S @ soupson: What happened to chem genie?
  2. D @ drdrizzy13: LSU is trash and has always been trash but a night game in death valley is unlike anything I've experienced. Except the first game back to the superdome reopened after Katrina destroyed it. Everybody was crying and drunk as shit lol. All time favorite in person sports moment ever.
  3. M @ meepmoopmeep: Kiffin is a traitor and he and LSU deserve each other since they’re both complete trash
  4. D @ drdrizzy13: yea he's a joke lol. Can't stand him.
  5. L @ Layne_Cobain: You know who rly sucks…lane kiffin 😂 dude is all that’s wrong with college sports or at least a big chunk of it…and he lied about being told he could still coach ole miss in the playoffs
  6. D @ drdrizzy13: Hey at least Ole Miss got in. I can't stand LSU. They really sucked this year.
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: as an A&M fan I’m content with us missing the SECCG for that reason. Georgia about to fuck Alabama up
  8. D @ drdrizzy13: Yeah I agree if bama loses I think they are out. That would be 3 losses. I don't see a 3 loss team getting in this year.
  9. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah that’s why sark was pleading his case about that Texas shouldn’t be punished for scheduling a non conference game against the best team and losing if they hadn’t done that they’d probably be in but oh well way it goes there’s always gonna be a few teams who get robbed or feel they got robbed even with a 12 team playofff…if bama loses to Georgia I’d think they’d be out but who knows
  10. D @ drdrizzy13: Alabama also lost to Florida State pretty bad. Whom Florida beat. I just think if they didn't decide to play ohio state the first game. They would be in with 2 losses instead of Alabama.
  11. M @ meepmoopmeep: @drdrizzy13 Texas lost to Florida of all teams, they weren’t heading for the playoffs anyways imo. At least not this year
  12. D @ drdrizzy13: Texas is offically out of the playoffs they didn't make the top 12. I do wish they were in it. They showed up against Texas AM. But there fatal flaw was scheduling Ohio State for their opening. Which would have been great if they won but they are a 3 loss team now.
  13. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah idk about arch I could see him staying with Sark for another year but if he plays rly well in the playoff who knows that is if they get in
  14. D @ drdrizzy13: Man a lot of Saints fan want Arch but I think he said he is playing another year. I would take him probably. But if Texas AM QB comes out or Ohio State's I think you gotta take one if your picking top 2.
  15. L @ Layne_Cobain: Is the qb class supposed to be stacked or thin for draft in April I follow college ball but I can’t think right now I think there’s def at least a few high potential qb declaring
  16. D @ drdrizzy13: Right now I believe we pick 2nd. ATM.
  17. D @ drdrizzy13: At first I figured he might be able to do something but our position players suck. We are playing a rookie QB. O-line sucks. It needs to be blown up. I hope we tank for the first pick
  18. L @ Layne_Cobain: Hopefully you guys maybe find a solid qb option in the draft you should end up with a very good pick
  19. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah dude Moore def does not seem like the guy for yall need to clean house
  20. D @ drdrizzy13: I should say our receivers suck
Back
Top