Rarechems/Freshchems

Wanted to update everyone (as I said I would) that my order was as pure as advertised. There was no noticeable difference compared to BJC before he stopped carrying the RC that I ordered from Rarechems btw.

 
So far mine is a no show..  I knew that i shouldn't of gotten my hopes up after receiving my first pack from them this year in a record time of 5 working days.

Ordered on 23/08
Shipped on 25/08 
Nothing yet..

While it's absolutely on me to have expected that trend to continue, it still hurts.. Though there's still hope because it has been 18 working days and i've had packs land after the 2 month mark but that was with full blown covid. We'll see.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Update on my pack: 

Processed 9/5

Shipped 9/7

Touchdown 9/21

I’d given up hope that it would show, especially since I’d been spoiled by 7 day touchdowns in July and August. Once again, I think their stealth is top notch and the reason why packs continue to land. I will say anticipate longer landing times and plan accordingly. 

 
Remember my earlier post stating that it beats buying scratch-offs..  

 I would confidently buy said scratch-off from Rare, all day every day.  

Just throwing that out there.  I cringe when I see customers from certain areas putting the blame on them.  Same with a couple of other outfits.  Any risk is explicitly stated, and agreed to by customer.  

*Not directed at anyone in particular, just a friendly reminder.  Most participants in this thread seem pretty savvy.

Rare has always been tops in my book.

 
@Scottydoesntknow What do you mean by scratch-offs? Sorry i probably missed your earlier posts.
I just mean that when someone  is purchasing research materials, that person is making a choice to gamble, whether they realize it or not.  In the US, one can go into nearly any convenience store and purchase "scratch-off" lottery tickets and take their chances.   Some have better odds than others..  

Regarding the acquisition of research materials online, one is always taking a chance.  Sometimes because of a source that cannot be trusted, sometimes due to happenings beyond any control (mail, custom, human error) and sometimes a combination of all.

My reference was just to point out that odds are certainly in your favor if utilizing a quality source such as Rare for research materials, as they have gone above and beyond to do their part to ensure maximum chance of success, ime.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well according to the shipping section on their website you do have tracking as an option for US.
It says that on the shipping section, but when you go to check out its not an option.  Can only do untracked to US.  Thats why they have that whole spiel about re-shippers on the front page.

 
Crap. Just when I finally decide to order 2fdck from them. I find out it has been banned in Germany, with a lot of other stuff, and they no longer offer it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gonna join y'all in trying them out now after the update. I had only ever ordered from smokeys. Got 3 for 3 from them. Was always tempted to try rarechems but didn't wanna try something when I know smokey's works, but they won't ship some of the stuff I want whereas rarechems will. Trying to get some 3-MMC and 2-FMA and hoping it all works out. Will update.
Just updating that I still haven't received this pack that I ordered. It was updated to shipped on 09/06. It wouldn't surprise me if it still showed up or if it got snatched up due to the contents of the order. I could see it going either way. I would like to comment that regardless of the outcome, since placing this order, I have also placed and received an order from Smokey's. I really do hope I can get packs from Rarechems because I get a better vibe from their quality. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. My order is definitely more seizeable than some others might be, but I'm just hoping it's running late.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Tied for 1st in the North! Chicago beat Pitt. Leggooo
  2. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: @Layne_Cobain yeah we look ugly on offense. but hopefully we continue to pull it out. Me too man Go Panthers !
  3. L @ Layne_Cobain: @tiquanunderwood good luck today against gang green buddy…can’t wait for MNF
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Hope everyone enjoys football sunday!
  5. M @ Mammasboi123: Thanks @MGAJB6122. I think for future reference, everyone should get in the habit of using the “report” button found on the bottom left of the top comment in threads like the ones mentioned in order to flag threads like this. I’d imagine it’s easier on @Admin than having to check the shout box every day or so.
  6. M @ MCAJB6122: Along the same lines… https://drugbuyersguide.info/threads/clobromazolam.10083/. It shows up on the first page 4 entries down when you search for this compound
  7. Dr-Octagon @ Dr-Octagon: I spell (emph`Asis) Pho-en-et-it-ca-ly
  8. Admin @ Admin: Deleted and agree better OPSEC should be practiced.
  9. J @ Jai239: Glad to contribute, more emphasis should be placed on spelling and abbreviations
  10. M @ Mammasboi123: Thanks for pointing that out @Jai238
  11. Mom&PopShop @ Mom&PopShop: I just mentioned something to @Admin as well.
  12. Z @ zdaBa: @Admin @Jai239 has a good point
  13. J @ Jai239: Something should be done about this thread because it’s on first page when looking up compound name
  14. J @ Jai239: https://drugbuyersguide.info/threads/fluoprazolam-new.11677/
  15. J @ Jai239: Any mods online?
  16. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good Morning Everyone
  17. Mom&PopShop @ Mom&PopShop: Ya them Panthers showed the Falcons what was up!!
  18. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: It was ugly, but happy to have the win. @Layne_Cobain
  19. L @ Lokemer: Oh man what happened around here :(
  20. etizoman @ etizoman: @aarons thanks. May he rip. 😥
Back
Top