Not complaining or anything as Rift is awesome, but apparently someone got the clobro and bromaz tested a few weeks ago, and on average the bromaz contain 1.3mg, while the clobro contain .25mg (I'm assuming this was when they were being sold as .5mg tablets). Just wondering now whether the new 1mg clobro are actually .5mg. It seems like everything is pretty underdosed. I received my more recent order of bromazolam and pyrazolam, and he was awesome to send many extras of the bromazolam. However, I literally took 10 of the pyrazolam over the course of 5 hours or so and barely felt a thing... had to eat a bromazolam and clobro to start to feel anything.
Unsui, I wish I could DM you bro... this is the second time in the past 24hrs I've found myself wishing I could donate to upgrade your account lol (all positive!)
Can I ask where that testing was done at (if you know)? My own machine is old and I lack the proper reference standards. But my interpretation of the limited data from the few runs I've done on it so far has indicated some *possible* variation between presses from the same shipment. Can't say high or low w/o proper certified reference materials, just hints of variations between runs, but again it could be my own flawed interpretation of the data.
Chromatography is not the exact science most ppl think it is, data between labs varies significantly and different people at the same lab (or even the same person on two different days) can be off by a surprising margin with even the most recent, high dollar equipment. But so far nothing of major concern registered on my old, outdated equipment (take that for what it's worth, lol)
I've been meaning to search for 3rd party lab recommendations on here, if you (or anyone else) can share? Also, you said "average," do you know how many were tested and what the range of variance was?
In defense of Rift, I know a few things about pressing and it's VERY difficult to get it standardized anywhere near 100%, especially when rushing to make it available to everyone who wants it yesterday. You can press fast, or accurately, but not both sadly. That being said, I have no complaints so far personally, but I have admittedly found myself occasionally wondering (idly) about the degree of uniformity of them. Not with any dissatisfaction though!
2nd question, are the pyraz's u have pink?
I've only assayed a few pinkys so far and they definitely registered, well enough that I ordered more
But, it was with with much "higher frequency" peaks than the bro's, which have much stronger "low frequency" output on the chromatogram, if you follow me. Very different signatures between them.
If you're calibrated toward the lower end of the spectrum, you might not have registered the vastly different signature of the pyraz. But it definitely showed up the few times I ran it, and strong peaks in its own way. I had to be careful not to overload my machine actually. It just registered on a very different wavelength than the bros, so much that if it was calibrated differently I could see it not detecting anything. Same with another analyst on a different machine (one could easily misinterpret the data as "delusions of inactivity" if you will). But I found my own machine actually seemed to function better with the pyraz frequency, and others have reported similar findings. Just a much "lighter" resonance, but definitely there.
But I heard the latest pyraz run was blue? I hope those are on par, I have more on the way. If yours were blue please tell me
Nothing but respect for Rift from my end so far. Will continue to update & thanks for sharing Unsui! Without CRMs I've nothing to compare to, so I can't say "over" or "under" objectively on anything. Just sharing what I have found so far, and humbly requesting details if you have any