Roxicodone vs oxycontin or long acting vs short acting

  • Thread starter Thread starter @fearless
  • Start date Start date
@

@fearless

Guest
I wasnt sure where to post this ?... I have been a member of dbg for a while, And have ordered many times from moda, ttm and jim, because i have only needed benzos and sometimes mj.....i recently had a bad knee injury, and was on perks for about a month...knee started to get better, but reinjured it a few days ago and same dr did not want to prescibe me anymore opiates....im now willing to start using sy vendors, but i have only taken perks or viks, and not a fan of the xtra tylenol......i would like to order oxycodone, but not sure if the roxy (fast acting) or oxy (longer acting) is better for pain. I also dont have insurance right now, so this is a convenient way to treat my problem. I see many sy vendors have the roxy as more expensive than the longer acting....is that because it is more effective?? I would like to place an order asap with a vendor, but because of the steep prices, i want to make the"correct order"

if anyone can help me understand this difference better, please pm me or respond to thread.....i was on taking about 20-30 mg of 7.5/325 perks or viks....thank you in advance

 
R0cksies are IR 0xyc0done, and have no tylenol. They are better for fast, instant pain rlf.   0xy ER is the same medicine, but works over longer periods of time. Perks are the same medicine as well, but have tylenol added to it.  R0cksies work better for acute pain, and 0xy ER are better for chronic pain. And they're cheaper (since the formulation has been changed).

 
R0cksies are IR 0xyc0done, and have no tylenol. They are better for fast, instant pain rlf.   0xy ER is the same medicine, but works over longer periods of time. Perks are the same medicine as well, but have tylenol added to it.  R0cksies work better for acute pain, and 0xy ER are better for chronic pain. And they're cheaper (since the formulation has been changed).
Thank  you, i am aware of the difference.....trying to figure out why roxy is more expensive than long acting oxycodone? As someone who is taking opiates for pain only and not interested in getting high, it would make more sense the longer acting oxy would be more expensive..im still not understanding

 
I agree, and it is a logical guess that longer lasting medicine would be more sought after, and have a higher price value than the shorter acting one.  Imo, IR does have a place in treating acute, debilitating pain, that needs a fast acting medicine; however, that same quick onset features are also the reason it has a high potential for abuse.  This is just my opinion--I have asked myself that same question.  

 
To answer your question on price.  Supply and demand.  For those who use these recreationally the op's aren't nearly as fun, as well as the fact that you can only take oraly.  Some people like to IV or snort.  The Roxannes are more because they are more sought after and the only oxycodone that steep in Mg that are IR.  Point is far more people buy rox, just have a look,at the threads.  Far more people buy blue rock climbing gear than anything else.  The demand is higher for the rox.  It's simple economics nothing more.  ?

Thank  you, i am aware of the difference.....trying to figure out why roxy is more expensive than long acting oxycodone? As someone who is taking opiates for pain only and not interested in getting high, it would make more sense the longer acting oxy would be more expensive..im still not understanding
Considering you are more interested in the Oxford's over the Roxannes this all works in your favor ?

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Good game.
  2. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: It swung the other way and they were leading up until 4 min
  3. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Plus you turned it over twice early. They could've easily took the momentum and players start to give up.
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Enjoy man! Much love!
  5. L @ Layne_Cobain: Now let’s see what’s going on with this packers bears game… enjoy buddy!!
  6. L @ Layne_Cobain: I am dude no doubt all the shit talking about us making it 10.5 point dogs played our asses off disappointing to say the least and again FUCK prevent D but couldn’t have asked for a better more competitive game
  7. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: You should be proud of.tnem
  8. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: But.your guys fought hard man! @Layne_Cobaim
  9. L @ Layne_Cobain: Every time, fuck evero for that bs playcalling at the end again proud as hell but damn this one hurts
  10. L @ Layne_Cobain: @tiquanunderwood glad you’re good bro…I’m proud af of how the boys played no one gave us a shot but holy hell did we choke playing that godddamn soft prevent D fails
  11. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Sorry @Layne_Cobain You lost in one of the many ravens like ways
  12. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Excited for someone new! And whoever gets the job should be stoked.
  13. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: But yeah that whole season made me want to throw up
  14. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: @Layne_Cobain I was pretty busy with holidays and working
  15. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: @Layne_Cobain I'm back! Ready for a coaching hunt! Rooting for your panthers today.
  16. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Hopefully it will just be a good game. Watching TCU’s natty run was about the worst it can get. Please don’t give us another blow out 60 min lol
  17. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: As much as I would like to see Carson Back win a natty after all he’s been through. I just don’t see it
  18. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: The U isn’t stopping that offense or defense. Even if they do manage to some what dumb down that defense. The offense is just way too explosive! Fkin Indiana who would’ve known lol
  19. M @ meepmoopmeep: Wasn’t fun watching Oregon get curb stomped in the first half but Indiana deserved the win more
  20. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think Indiana is going to win the natty
Back
Top