Roxicodone vs oxycontin or long acting vs short acting

  • Thread starter Thread starter @fearless
  • Start date Start date
@

@fearless

Guest
I wasnt sure where to post this ?... I have been a member of dbg for a while, And have ordered many times from moda, ttm and jim, because i have only needed benzos and sometimes mj.....i recently had a bad knee injury, and was on perks for about a month...knee started to get better, but reinjured it a few days ago and same dr did not want to prescibe me anymore opiates....im now willing to start using sy vendors, but i have only taken perks or viks, and not a fan of the xtra tylenol......i would like to order oxycodone, but not sure if the roxy (fast acting) or oxy (longer acting) is better for pain. I also dont have insurance right now, so this is a convenient way to treat my problem. I see many sy vendors have the roxy as more expensive than the longer acting....is that because it is more effective?? I would like to place an order asap with a vendor, but because of the steep prices, i want to make the"correct order"

if anyone can help me understand this difference better, please pm me or respond to thread.....i was on taking about 20-30 mg of 7.5/325 perks or viks....thank you in advance

 
R0cksies are IR 0xyc0done, and have no tylenol. They are better for fast, instant pain rlf.   0xy ER is the same medicine, but works over longer periods of time. Perks are the same medicine as well, but have tylenol added to it.  R0cksies work better for acute pain, and 0xy ER are better for chronic pain. And they're cheaper (since the formulation has been changed).

 
R0cksies are IR 0xyc0done, and have no tylenol. They are better for fast, instant pain rlf.   0xy ER is the same medicine, but works over longer periods of time. Perks are the same medicine as well, but have tylenol added to it.  R0cksies work better for acute pain, and 0xy ER are better for chronic pain. And they're cheaper (since the formulation has been changed).
Thank  you, i am aware of the difference.....trying to figure out why roxy is more expensive than long acting oxycodone? As someone who is taking opiates for pain only and not interested in getting high, it would make more sense the longer acting oxy would be more expensive..im still not understanding

 
I agree, and it is a logical guess that longer lasting medicine would be more sought after, and have a higher price value than the shorter acting one.  Imo, IR does have a place in treating acute, debilitating pain, that needs a fast acting medicine; however, that same quick onset features are also the reason it has a high potential for abuse.  This is just my opinion--I have asked myself that same question.  

 
To answer your question on price.  Supply and demand.  For those who use these recreationally the op's aren't nearly as fun, as well as the fact that you can only take oraly.  Some people like to IV or snort.  The Roxannes are more because they are more sought after and the only oxycodone that steep in Mg that are IR.  Point is far more people buy rox, just have a look,at the threads.  Far more people buy blue rock climbing gear than anything else.  The demand is higher for the rox.  It's simple economics nothing more.  ?

Thank  you, i am aware of the difference.....trying to figure out why roxy is more expensive than long acting oxycodone? As someone who is taking opiates for pain only and not interested in getting high, it would make more sense the longer acting oxy would be more expensive..im still not understanding
Considering you are more interested in the Oxford's over the Roxannes this all works in your favor ?

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good morning Guys
  2. T @ Tinyfishnemo: Hope everyone has a good and safe weekend.
  3. T @ tylerderrden: Dunno
  4. S @ soupson: What happened to chem genie?
  5. D @ drdrizzy13: LSU is trash and has always been trash but a night game in death valley is unlike anything I've experienced. Except the first game back to the superdome reopened after Katrina destroyed it. Everybody was crying and drunk as shit lol. All time favorite in person sports moment ever.
  6. M @ meepmoopmeep: Kiffin is a traitor and he and LSU deserve each other since they’re both complete trash
  7. D @ drdrizzy13: yea he's a joke lol. Can't stand him.
  8. L @ Layne_Cobain: You know who rly sucks…lane kiffin 😂 dude is all that’s wrong with college sports or at least a big chunk of it…and he lied about being told he could still coach ole miss in the playoffs
  9. D @ drdrizzy13: Hey at least Ole Miss got in. I can't stand LSU. They really sucked this year.
  10. M @ meepmoopmeep: as an A&M fan I’m content with us missing the SECCG for that reason. Georgia about to fuck Alabama up
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: Yeah I agree if bama loses I think they are out. That would be 3 losses. I don't see a 3 loss team getting in this year.
  12. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah that’s why sark was pleading his case about that Texas shouldn’t be punished for scheduling a non conference game against the best team and losing if they hadn’t done that they’d probably be in but oh well way it goes there’s always gonna be a few teams who get robbed or feel they got robbed even with a 12 team playofff…if bama loses to Georgia I’d think they’d be out but who knows
  13. D @ drdrizzy13: Alabama also lost to Florida State pretty bad. Whom Florida beat. I just think if they didn't decide to play ohio state the first game. They would be in with 2 losses instead of Alabama.
  14. M @ meepmoopmeep: @drdrizzy13 Texas lost to Florida of all teams, they weren’t heading for the playoffs anyways imo. At least not this year
  15. D @ drdrizzy13: Texas is offically out of the playoffs they didn't make the top 12. I do wish they were in it. They showed up against Texas AM. But there fatal flaw was scheduling Ohio State for their opening. Which would have been great if they won but they are a 3 loss team now.
  16. L @ Layne_Cobain: Yeah idk about arch I could see him staying with Sark for another year but if he plays rly well in the playoff who knows that is if they get in
  17. D @ drdrizzy13: Man a lot of Saints fan want Arch but I think he said he is playing another year. I would take him probably. But if Texas AM QB comes out or Ohio State's I think you gotta take one if your picking top 2.
  18. L @ Layne_Cobain: Is the qb class supposed to be stacked or thin for draft in April I follow college ball but I can’t think right now I think there’s def at least a few high potential qb declaring
  19. D @ drdrizzy13: Right now I believe we pick 2nd. ATM.
  20. D @ drdrizzy13: At first I figured he might be able to do something but our position players suck. We are playing a rookie QB. O-line sucks. It needs to be blown up. I hope we tank for the first pick
Back
Top