Roxicodone vs oxycontin or long acting vs short acting

  • Thread starter Thread starter @fearless
  • Start date Start date
@

@fearless

Guest
I wasnt sure where to post this ?... I have been a member of dbg for a while, And have ordered many times from moda, ttm and jim, because i have only needed benzos and sometimes mj.....i recently had a bad knee injury, and was on perks for about a month...knee started to get better, but reinjured it a few days ago and same dr did not want to prescibe me anymore opiates....im now willing to start using sy vendors, but i have only taken perks or viks, and not a fan of the xtra tylenol......i would like to order oxycodone, but not sure if the roxy (fast acting) or oxy (longer acting) is better for pain. I also dont have insurance right now, so this is a convenient way to treat my problem. I see many sy vendors have the roxy as more expensive than the longer acting....is that because it is more effective?? I would like to place an order asap with a vendor, but because of the steep prices, i want to make the"correct order"

if anyone can help me understand this difference better, please pm me or respond to thread.....i was on taking about 20-30 mg of 7.5/325 perks or viks....thank you in advance

 
R0cksies are IR 0xyc0done, and have no tylenol. They are better for fast, instant pain rlf.   0xy ER is the same medicine, but works over longer periods of time. Perks are the same medicine as well, but have tylenol added to it.  R0cksies work better for acute pain, and 0xy ER are better for chronic pain. And they're cheaper (since the formulation has been changed).

 
R0cksies are IR 0xyc0done, and have no tylenol. They are better for fast, instant pain rlf.   0xy ER is the same medicine, but works over longer periods of time. Perks are the same medicine as well, but have tylenol added to it.  R0cksies work better for acute pain, and 0xy ER are better for chronic pain. And they're cheaper (since the formulation has been changed).
Thank  you, i am aware of the difference.....trying to figure out why roxy is more expensive than long acting oxycodone? As someone who is taking opiates for pain only and not interested in getting high, it would make more sense the longer acting oxy would be more expensive..im still not understanding

 
I agree, and it is a logical guess that longer lasting medicine would be more sought after, and have a higher price value than the shorter acting one.  Imo, IR does have a place in treating acute, debilitating pain, that needs a fast acting medicine; however, that same quick onset features are also the reason it has a high potential for abuse.  This is just my opinion--I have asked myself that same question.  

 
To answer your question on price.  Supply and demand.  For those who use these recreationally the op's aren't nearly as fun, as well as the fact that you can only take oraly.  Some people like to IV or snort.  The Roxannes are more because they are more sought after and the only oxycodone that steep in Mg that are IR.  Point is far more people buy rox, just have a look,at the threads.  Far more people buy blue rock climbing gear than anything else.  The demand is higher for the rox.  It's simple economics nothing more.  ?

Thank  you, i am aware of the difference.....trying to figure out why roxy is more expensive than long acting oxycodone? As someone who is taking opiates for pain only and not interested in getting high, it would make more sense the longer acting oxy would be more expensive..im still not understanding
Considering you are more interested in the Oxford's over the Roxannes this all works in your favor ?

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Gracie5 @ Gracie5: All the answers and more discussion about the types of boxes is accessible with Search. Mostly you can find this under Shipping and Tracking. When you search mailboxes you find numerous entries.
  2. Bodix @ Bodix: But this was a few years ago
  3. R @ RedMan39: I almost feel bad for Josh Allen he’s just getting older I can’t believe they fired mcdermot
  4. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  5. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  6. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  8. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
  10. D @ drdrizzy13: no doubt
  11. Thoth @ Thoth: Josh Allen will be 1st Ballot HOF
  12. D @ drdrizzy13: word I wanted Josh Allen to win a Superbowl. They've been so close for a few years now. Josh Allen messed up last game.
  13. R @ RedMan39: Agreed sucks the bills didn’t make it
  14. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think pats vs hawks superbowl
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: saying that as a rams fan
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: The rams are definitely good but I don’t believe they are seahawk level good
  17. L @ Layne_Cobain: Especially sucks the bills didn’t pull it off now since Nix is out and even with that Denver defense predict pats have an easy route to Super Bowl now…pats rams or pats hawks rematch? Perhaps
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: The Hawks look STRONG
  19. R @ RedMan39: Yeah my teams not in it (as usual) so just hoping for good games not blowouts lol
  20. M @ meepmoopmeep: Still a better game than the 49ers vs Seahawks, that one was so lopsided it made me feel bad
Back
Top