sr-17018.org legit?

Firstly, they claim to be a “harm reduction” based organization. Yet at the same time they “sell” said compound without so much as attempting to prove they’ve had any sort of legitimate 3rd party analytical tests run on their mags to provide characterization and purity (i.e there’s zero reports that include methods such as GCMS / LCMS, FTIR, NMR, etc..).

In fact, if you go to their “testing” page, all they do is list 3 commonly used rèàgènt tests, and then spell out what the expected colòr change over time should be. They don’t even provide images of them performing these rèàgént tests on their own stock which is an huge red flag and a bit laughable coming from a self proclaimed harm reduction org.

This whole site screams “amateur” to me. They’re relying on their audience being people who are not experts in chemistry so that they will sound legitimate without needing to provide actual proof of their expertise.

At least the vendors who offer these mags through this forum don’t pretend to be something they’re not.

I’d steer clear of this site for the time being until they either have time to update their methods and content (as opposed to poorly regurgitating a few well-known talking points from a select few academic papers), or until there’s some legitimate reviews coming in from reliable members. Until then, I’ll stick to the 3-4 vendors here that offer quality product at the same, if not slightly lower, prices.

-MB
 
Last edited:
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Leggo Minter baby!
  2. Gracie5 @ Gracie5: All the answers and more discussion about the types of boxes is accessible with Search. Mostly you can find this under Shipping and Tracking. When you search mailboxes you find numerous entries.
  3. Bodix @ Bodix: But this was a few years ago
  4. R @ RedMan39: I almost feel bad for Josh Allen he’s just getting older I can’t believe they fired mcdermot
  5. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  6. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: no doubt
  12. Thoth @ Thoth: Josh Allen will be 1st Ballot HOF
  13. D @ drdrizzy13: word I wanted Josh Allen to win a Superbowl. They've been so close for a few years now. Josh Allen messed up last game.
  14. R @ RedMan39: Agreed sucks the bills didn’t make it
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think pats vs hawks superbowl
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: saying that as a rams fan
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: The rams are definitely good but I don’t believe they are seahawk level good
  18. L @ Layne_Cobain: Especially sucks the bills didn’t pull it off now since Nix is out and even with that Denver defense predict pats have an easy route to Super Bowl now…pats rams or pats hawks rematch? Perhaps
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: The Hawks look STRONG
  20. R @ RedMan39: Yeah my teams not in it (as usual) so just hoping for good games not blowouts lol
Back
Top