Vendors requiring explanation of your research

hellfee

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
32
Hope this question is ok to be asking here.

What do you guys write? Ive been scared away from multiple vendors who require this. I don’t know the makes and models of typical research equipment, etc. 

 
Our organization intends to use these chemicals for in vitro laboratory diagnostic studies using microbial organism on petri culture.

P.s. in vitro= in glass, in vivo= in life (animal or human)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would think any information is good they just need to l3g@lly be covered is all. Simply stating "I plan to use this R3s3@rch Ch3m1c@l to see how it effects the growth of a Tomato Plant I'm growing" lol even that will work.

 
Tell them you're doing reagent testing, or say you're doing gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (i.e, doing your own GC-MS test).

 
I just wrote laboratory in-vitro research purposes, measuring stability and reactivity, and they accepted it.

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. S @ sleepyjoefan: what is shipping time like for jack?
  2. Realbenzeyes @ Realbenzeyes: Seahawks going to win this but it would be a great comeback story for the patriots and a monster play for maye and the squad
  3. Professor_ @ Professor_: Good Morning everyone
  4. shoutback @ shoutback: Coach will get Woolen straightened out.
  5. shoutback @ shoutback: Yessir but I think he may have matured and he is showing steadiness during crunch time. All you can ask of anyone. He has answered the call so far.
  6. M @ meepmoopmeep: Darnold sometimes does Darnold things but otherwise a skilled QB
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: @shoutback he seriously needs to be benched for being a jackass who almost cost the seahawks the game
  8. shoutback @ shoutback: @meepmoopmeep that Woolen situation was atrocious
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: 2018 draft
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: At least football is something we all can agree on. I'm happy for Darnold. Crazy to think he is the 1st of that 2018 to make it to the SB
  11. shoutback @ shoutback: Squack Squack mfers lol j/k but yeah go fucking Seahawks!
  12. M @ meepmoopmeep: sad that the rams aren’t advancing but saw it coming from a mile away. go seahawks!
  13. shoutback @ shoutback: GO HAWKS!
  14. L @ Layne_Cobain: Stidham played well enuff to win until that late pick that ended it ;( hate the pats hope Sammy and the Seahawks can handle em that defense is fierce but the offense isn’t as explosive as the rams and obviously he ain’t the caliber of Matthew stafford but anyways, go Hawks!!!
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: But the hawks played better and earned their SB spot
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: Riq Woolen being an absolute clown and handing the rams a TD for unsportsmanlike behavior at the sidelines
  17. shoutback @ shoutback: What about them HAWKS!
  18. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Come on Stidham!
  19. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Now that's interesting...
  20. L @ Layne_Cobain: McCarthy to the yinzers
Back
Top