Vendors requiring explanation of your research

hellfee

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
32
Hope this question is ok to be asking here.

What do you guys write? Ive been scared away from multiple vendors who require this. I don’t know the makes and models of typical research equipment, etc. 

 
Our organization intends to use these chemicals for in vitro laboratory diagnostic studies using microbial organism on petri culture.

P.s. in vitro= in glass, in vivo= in life (animal or human)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would think any information is good they just need to l3g@lly be covered is all. Simply stating "I plan to use this R3s3@rch Ch3m1c@l to see how it effects the growth of a Tomato Plant I'm growing" lol even that will work.

 
Tell them you're doing reagent testing, or say you're doing gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (i.e, doing your own GC-MS test).

 
I just wrote laboratory in-vitro research purposes, measuring stability and reactivity, and they accepted it.

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Gracie5 @ Gracie5: All the answers and more discussion about the types of boxes is accessible with Search. Mostly you can find this under Shipping and Tracking. When you search mailboxes you find numerous entries.
  2. Bodix @ Bodix: But this was a few years ago
  3. R @ RedMan39: I almost feel bad for Josh Allen he’s just getting older I can’t believe they fired mcdermot
  4. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  5. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  6. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  8. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
  10. D @ drdrizzy13: no doubt
  11. Thoth @ Thoth: Josh Allen will be 1st Ballot HOF
  12. D @ drdrizzy13: word I wanted Josh Allen to win a Superbowl. They've been so close for a few years now. Josh Allen messed up last game.
  13. R @ RedMan39: Agreed sucks the bills didn’t make it
  14. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think pats vs hawks superbowl
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: saying that as a rams fan
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: The rams are definitely good but I don’t believe they are seahawk level good
  17. L @ Layne_Cobain: Especially sucks the bills didn’t pull it off now since Nix is out and even with that Denver defense predict pats have an easy route to Super Bowl now…pats rams or pats hawks rematch? Perhaps
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: The Hawks look STRONG
  19. R @ RedMan39: Yeah my teams not in it (as usual) so just hoping for good games not blowouts lol
  20. M @ meepmoopmeep: Still a better game than the 49ers vs Seahawks, that one was so lopsided it made me feel bad
Back
Top