Hey All, I have some updates regarding the new batch of 4metmp. Preliminary results from the lab I’m affiliated with are surprisingly accurate.
My vendor also stated he already received identical preliminary results and expects a full report by Wednesday on the 4me and other new mags and batches that came in. (I didn’t realize he’d begun lab testing but I’m not surprised since in my 100 or so subscriptions of several dozen chems I’ve never had a single mag test incorrectly (via both full anonymous lab analysis , and my affiliate lab when possible.)
I’m thinking that it is just bad synth of a citric acid version, but obviously the possibility of contaminants/byproducts/adulterants/etf CAN NOT be ruled out yet as not everything is picked up by these preliminary lab tests. All I can say for certain is the sample does at least contain 4metmp. That DOES NOT mean it is definitely safe or free of any other potential adulterants, it only means the sample definitely contains 4metmp.
I will update with the full analysis report both Wednesday when my vendor sends the full analysis and when I receive the one I sent in. I am also happy to send a copy of the actual lab analysis to anyone who request it, as I want to emphasize that I am just a random person typing on the internet, I could be anyone, and these words should not replace any tests you do yourself.
As great as this community is and I know many of us (myself included) have genuinely positive intentions, but there are no guarantees in this game that anyone is who they say they are, or that their words are honest.
So don’t drop your guard and use a comment from someone unknown in place of personal testing of your reading material. If the results aren’t from YOUR personal tests and experiences, they should never be relied on as safe or guaranteed. It is always the responsibility of the reader to take responsibility for their safety by personally testing any reading material!
On a similar note, my main purpose for joining this community is to complete a project I’ve been working on in my lab, which is compiling repeatable home testing using reagents accessible the average reader, of as many novel titles with no currently published results available for comparison testing. The goal being to provide a greater level of harm reduction by equipping the average reader with the tools to conduct first line home testing on a broader range of titles than is currently available. (this obviously does not take the place traditional full lab analysis, and can only prove to moderate degree that a given sample contains something, It cannot determine purity or rule out existence of other adulterants. No different than the standard home tests that you are familiar with.
This is a collaboration with a well known trusted harm reduction nonprofit that the majority of you are familiar with and likely have used before. Once enough consistent data from repeated tests is collected and confirmed, it will be released directly by them as a means for comparison against a readers home testing results (in the same chart format that you’ve probably used if you’ve ever done traditional home testing on the commonly known title's from any of the companies who provide the material to do so).
If anyone is interested in contributing their collected home data on title with no current reference for testing, feel free to pm me for info on how to get involved. Obviously only persons with knowledge of opsec consisting of private servers, pgp , configured routers etc. should consider involvement in that project for obvious personal privacy purposes.
Will be back with an update on Wednesday or sooner! Wishing everyone Safe & happy reading!
My vendor also stated he already received identical preliminary results and expects a full report by Wednesday on the 4me and other new mags and batches that came in. (I didn’t realize he’d begun lab testing but I’m not surprised since in my 100 or so subscriptions of several dozen chems I’ve never had a single mag test incorrectly (via both full anonymous lab analysis , and my affiliate lab when possible.)
I’m thinking that it is just bad synth of a citric acid version, but obviously the possibility of contaminants/byproducts/adulterants/etf CAN NOT be ruled out yet as not everything is picked up by these preliminary lab tests. All I can say for certain is the sample does at least contain 4metmp. That DOES NOT mean it is definitely safe or free of any other potential adulterants, it only means the sample definitely contains 4metmp.
I will update with the full analysis report both Wednesday when my vendor sends the full analysis and when I receive the one I sent in. I am also happy to send a copy of the actual lab analysis to anyone who request it, as I want to emphasize that I am just a random person typing on the internet, I could be anyone, and these words should not replace any tests you do yourself.
As great as this community is and I know many of us (myself included) have genuinely positive intentions, but there are no guarantees in this game that anyone is who they say they are, or that their words are honest.
So don’t drop your guard and use a comment from someone unknown in place of personal testing of your reading material. If the results aren’t from YOUR personal tests and experiences, they should never be relied on as safe or guaranteed. It is always the responsibility of the reader to take responsibility for their safety by personally testing any reading material!
On a similar note, my main purpose for joining this community is to complete a project I’ve been working on in my lab, which is compiling repeatable home testing using reagents accessible the average reader, of as many novel titles with no currently published results available for comparison testing. The goal being to provide a greater level of harm reduction by equipping the average reader with the tools to conduct first line home testing on a broader range of titles than is currently available. (this obviously does not take the place traditional full lab analysis, and can only prove to moderate degree that a given sample contains something, It cannot determine purity or rule out existence of other adulterants. No different than the standard home tests that you are familiar with.
This is a collaboration with a well known trusted harm reduction nonprofit that the majority of you are familiar with and likely have used before. Once enough consistent data from repeated tests is collected and confirmed, it will be released directly by them as a means for comparison against a readers home testing results (in the same chart format that you’ve probably used if you’ve ever done traditional home testing on the commonly known title's from any of the companies who provide the material to do so).
If anyone is interested in contributing their collected home data on title with no current reference for testing, feel free to pm me for info on how to get involved. Obviously only persons with knowledge of opsec consisting of private servers, pgp , configured routers etc. should consider involvement in that project for obvious personal privacy purposes.
Will be back with an update on Wednesday or sooner! Wishing everyone Safe & happy reading!
