CL-218-872

bigjackchen

Member
VENDOR ACCOUNT
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
524
NEW PRODUCT:

CL-218,872:
IUPAC NAME: 3-methyl-6-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-f]pyridazine
CAS Number: 66548-69-4
Chemical formula: C13H9F3N4
Molar mass: 278.238 g•mol−1



CL-218,872 is a sedative and hypnotic drug used in scientific research.It has similar effects to sedative-hypnotic benzodiazepine drugs such as triazolam, but is structurally distinct and so is classed as a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic.

CL-218,872 is a GABAA partial agonist which is selective for the α1 subtype.[3][4][5] It has a range of effects including sedative, hypnotic, anxiolytic, anticonvulsant and amnestic actions, however the most prominent actions are sedation and amnesia, and CL-218,872 produces effects very similar to those of the hypnotic imidazopyridine derivative zolpidem in animal studies.
This product is intended for laboratory research purposes only and are not to be used for any other purposes.
 
It’s partial agonist across the 1-6 or just the 5 mainstream subunits? Also, partial at GABAAR1 subunit or it has more traditional affinity comparable to a-drugs? any antagonistic action that could boot out full agonist like diazepam but not be itself able to give effects at the subunit level, causing mucho distress if you’re a chronic full agonist user as if 2, 3 are outcompeting your Xanax but not producing the strong conformational and post synaptic molecular changes that bring that GABA in close for that anxiety relief - it’s gonna be just like a can of ambien-light that causes instant wash it and wd for that everyday user. Interesting and this is the way the research must go. Thanks!
 
It's like a zdrug hybrid personally I would stay away, Ive had my vendors offer it to me and I've said absolutely no thank you. I suggest you all do the same they label it as a benzo but it is not a benzo.
 
It's like a zdrug hybrid personally I would stay away, Ive had my vendors offer it to me and I've said absolutely no thank you. I suggest you all do the same they label it as a benzo but it is not a benzo.
why do you recommend so strongly against this class? i'm not familiar with the reason z drugs are undesirable other than, i think, vague recall about intense nightmares and occasional sleep-walking and delirium associated with ambien.
 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Gracie5 @ Gracie5: All the answers and more discussion about the types of boxes is accessible with Search. Mostly you can find this under Shipping and Tracking. When you search mailboxes you find numerous entries.
  2. Bodix @ Bodix: But this was a few years ago
  3. R @ RedMan39: I almost feel bad for Josh Allen he’s just getting older I can’t believe they fired mcdermot
  4. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  5. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  6. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  8. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
  10. D @ drdrizzy13: no doubt
  11. Thoth @ Thoth: Josh Allen will be 1st Ballot HOF
  12. D @ drdrizzy13: word I wanted Josh Allen to win a Superbowl. They've been so close for a few years now. Josh Allen messed up last game.
  13. R @ RedMan39: Agreed sucks the bills didn’t make it
  14. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think pats vs hawks superbowl
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: saying that as a rams fan
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: The rams are definitely good but I don’t believe they are seahawk level good
  17. L @ Layne_Cobain: Especially sucks the bills didn’t pull it off now since Nix is out and even with that Denver defense predict pats have an easy route to Super Bowl now…pats rams or pats hawks rematch? Perhaps
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: The Hawks look STRONG
  19. R @ RedMan39: Yeah my teams not in it (as usual) so just hoping for good games not blowouts lol
  20. M @ meepmoopmeep: Still a better game than the 49ers vs Seahawks, that one was so lopsided it made me feel bad
Back
Top