Ok so.. I'm no genius, but I do have an IQ of 170. Thanks to the fact that I watch tv.
And if you can't find any signs of life after the first 48 hours, the probability raises to 90% that they're not alive.
I don't mean to be the negative nancy of this group, but my instincts never lie to me.
What you have all learned to love and adore as "top10meds", has now become "top10toast".
Sorry if I sound so detached, so let me be more serious. I use to be a member on the DB forums. When this
use to happen, there was always that 1 person who was buddy buddy with the owner, and had their alternate
email... name of their dog and wife etc. Are their emails down too? There's got to be a way to get more information
on this. So people don't sit around sulking for 10 years waiting for their favorite IOP to come back.
Didn't someone say they recieved a confirmation AFTER the site went down?
Where did that confirmation come from? Can you respond to the address and ask whats going on?
I know theres not that many people on this forum, but there's got to be someone who can reach the owner.
Someone with an IQ like mine, who has actually ordered from this place before. /default_tongue.png
Well, an IQ of 170 would in fact make you a genius, so there's that. While my earlier statements are diametrically opposed to your instincts, I'm certainly not going to insist nor guarantee that you're instincts are wrong. You very well may be right, at least in part, but as I said, time will tell the tale. The one part of your post that I will disagree with is the analogy to missing persons. While it's absolutely true that the chances of a missing person being found alive greatly diminish after they've been missing for more than 48 hours, there really isn't a parallel to be drawn between that phenomena and that of internet pharmacy sites / vendors going dark. I wrote at length about DBG's own issues of a few weeks back, and those of Anonymous Speech (and their ICANN policy compliance), who coincidentally is the registrar for both DBG's domains as well as TTM's. Does that mean that the reason for DBG going dark for a few days is the same as TTM's? Absolutely not. However, there ARE a number of factors that can cause a domain or website to be taken down by the registrar and / or host that go no further than that, are are not necessarily indicative of adverse legal enforcement issues. Further, the factors that I reference can sometimes take multiple days and / or weeks to resolve, depending upon the specific situation and the resolution strategy. As an example, my company, in it's early days, hosted our website on an inexpensive shared hosting plan, with hundreds of sites on the same IP address. One of them wound up being some spam operation, which got the IP address, as well as every URL on that IP address, blacklisted with SpamHaus, and 90%+ of our outgoing emails began bouncing back. We immediately changed over to a dedicated IP / hosting plan, but by then the damage had been done, and it took me almost a month to reverse all of it. I realize that whatever is going on with TTM is probably quite a bit different than my example, but the point being, domain and site / hosting related issues can sometimes be much more involved in terms of crafting a solution than just making a few phone calls, and they can certainly take more than 48 hours to resolve.
At this point, I see no reason to presume that TTM as a vendor is gone, never to return. I do agree, however, that the specific URL that they have been using is likely "toast", to borrow your term, but that's purely conjecture on my part. As for your assertion that some member of DBG possesses the ability to reach the owner and receive concrete answers, I again must disagree. One must keep in mind the nature of the business we're talking about here, and owners of such enterprises generally don't hand out business cards and make their ownership of the enterprise known. At least not to anyone other than those with an absolute "need to know". In my 20+ years of operating a business catering to the financial needs of professional athletes and others in very public businesses, I've learned a few things about those who place a high value on discretion and privacy, and I can assure you that whomever the principals of TTM are, they certainly would not divulge that information to any customer, particularly in this industry. I'm quite certain that this will seem perfectly logical to someone of your intellect.
While I certainly agree that it would be preferable for TTM's customer base to have concrete knowledge of their fate in this situation, the reality is that the masses won't know until such time as they want them to know. Or, in the case of a "doomsday" scenario, when the media lets them know. In the meantime, the only sensible thing to do is to go about one's daily business, hope for the best, but plan for the worst.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend, and take care.....
Jewy