Safe? Think So

halflife

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
137
When I started with Safe-Mail (2007?). I was advised that the message is encrpyted (FWIW)

However the subject is not encrypted.

This may likely still so. Anone know?

==========

So, "exercising anl over-abundance of caution:"

It behooves us to avoid subs like "great sheet! I wanna order a lot more!"

=========

However avoid silly spammy subjects or you may end up in the Spam folder. Happened to me once.

=========

All please advise where I'm off. I've been out of touch for 3 years.

1/2

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I strongly reccomend using PGP even with safe-mail.  This is simply because should anything get compromised, you have extra security.

If anyone wants to discuss PGP or other email safety, feel free to respond.  Please encrypt your message using my public key.  It's just good practice as far as I'm concerned.

 
Last edited:
Interesting take and one thing I've always worried about is security, however, I've come to the conclusion that nothing said or written cannot be broken. My son is in the military, he has told me more than once, "dad if you can think it, we can do it." I have another friend, manager of local telephone entity, he tells me you would not believe the number of wiretaps that they are asked to installed each and every day by the Federal gov't. He said it would blow your mind. Now with all that being said I don't get too paranoid. First someone like me is a small fish, small personal user, and I have no value to them, secondly with the billions of messages and emails sent every day they are after the really big fish, most of us don't qualify and the monitoring it a little overwhelming. Would they be more worried about me trying to pick up a little smoke or some much larger activity that could be harmful, well that answers itself. Again, it does pay to be cautious, not stupid, again it pays to use everything at our disposal to protect our identify, but regardless of what we think, I'm pretty sure any encryption we use can be easily picked apart by the systems that be. Just my take.

 
Long as this is a safe-mail thread, may I ask our experts & other experienced folk?

In the "Read on" in the Sent folder, the status reported is generally "Sent"

What does "Delivered" signify even a day later?

Never saw that.

Sender & recipient both on safe-mail

Thank You So!

1/2

 
Long as this is a safe-mail thread, may I ask our experts & other experienced folk?

In the "Read on" in the Sent folder, the status reported is generally "Sent"

What does "Delivered" signify even a day later?

Never saw that.

Sender & recipient both on safe-mail

Thank You So!

1/2
It shows "Sent" if you send from SM to someone with another provider (say gmail, countermail, yahoo, etc.)

"Delivered" shows if you send from SM to SM, and the other SM user has not yet opened or read the message yet.

Once the other SM user reads it, it will change from "Delivered" to "Read on 11-22-12 at (time)" (for example)

Hope that helps.

 
Thank you Mr. Heisenberg!

Makes perfect sense. The definition in SM help was vague & confusing (at least to me).

Of course had I thought this out, there would be no confusion.

A consistently 1000% service not getting to read every email immediately on the penultimate day of shipping before a holiday? Is that possible?

If I stopped to think, I wouldn't have sent 6 increasingly concerned emails.

Thank you for putting my mind at ease, Mr. Heisenberg. It all worked out & the merchant answered each email without annoyance in the slightest!

Happy holidays to you & the rest of our community!

1/2

 
Thank you for putting my mind at ease, Mr. Heisenberg. It all worked out & the merchant answered each email without annoyance in the slightest!

Happy holidays to you & the rest of our community!

1/2
No problem bud!  Same to you as well!

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. D @ dhertz9192@gm: Delete
  2. Thoth @ Thoth: @sporidicus honestly depends on the mag. Read read read read the forum
  3. Thoth @ Thoth: CFP needs more of an NBA or MLB playoff structure but that would be hard to structure. Divisions inside Leagues
  4. S @ sporidicus: or is there a better place on the forum to ask
  5. S @ sporidicus: can anyone help me with a chemistry problem? someone purposefully poured powdered sugar into my mag, i need to see if i can clean it off. any chemists here?
  6. M @ meepmoopmeep: agreed
  7. D @ drdrizzy13: Yea it will be tough but I think they might just have enough. I guess we will see what tomorrrow night?
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: if miami can take down ohio then anything can happen, lmao
  9. M @ meepmoopmeep: i feel like they deserve it after all of the drama. at the same time though, Indiana is extremely good and will be a mountain for Ole Miss to climb if they make it to the championship game
  10. D @ drdrizzy13: I wouldn't mind seeing Ole Miss win either out of the teams that are left.
  11. M @ meepmoopmeep: Ole Miss has the chance to do the funniest thing ever and win a championship without Kiffin
  12. M @ meepmoopmeep: I have a vendetta against Miami so I’m hoping its Indiana v Ole Miss
  13. M @ meepmoopmeep: Who’s making it to the CFP championship?
  14. R @ Royboy99: Helllsss yeah Boys JAX review in
  15. L @ Layne_Cobain: @tiquanunderwood sorry brother that’s a tough pill to swallow fuck
  16. Y @ Yaugae5121: I cannot believe that ending. That game was absolutely INSANE!!
  17. Y @ Yaugae5121: This has been a crazy game so far!!
  18. Y @ Yaugae5121: Booo let’s go Steelers @tiquanunderwood =] here’s to a good game!!
  19. L @ Layne_Cobain: @tiquanunderwood LETS GOOOO BABY HEY ANYWAY YOU CAN GET IN YOU TAKE IT. Obviously prefer to handle your own business but F it we’re in…I think we can beat San Fran we beat the rams in just happy to be back in after 8-9 years wooooooo!!! Go ravens !!!
  20. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: @Layne_Cobain Looks like you'll make it!
Back
Top