Seized

I thought for the sake of the forum I would post this as well. Just because they have something does not mean you will get it ll. Many times I have seen a situation and no LL. It’s a little unfair for a vendor to rely on an LL because it’s far as I’m concerned that’s done less than more. It simply just disappears. While I don’t doubt there is a high degree of theft and or deception I find it more probable pattern was notated and acted upon. It hurts all of us and I was hoping that we would have a possible situation where we could work out solutions that were amicable by all. Instead of becoming more entrenched and losing even more. Oh well take it or leave it I guess. I just think everybody needs to be aware there is a a trend on the horizon. We can deny it or embrace and whip it and keep the honest DBG folks whole. To so degree or share the burden. We do not deserve to be met with disbelieve or accusation though. Not if it’s obvious we are in good standing. I have said my “part” for the day. Happy Easter enjoy it all!!!!!

 
@Deepnorth    Not sure if this applies to you, but i don't think you would get an LL if the items are only sch 1 or 2.  The purpose of the LL isn't to say GOT YOU!!, but to legally notify of the seizure in case you want to contest it, but schedule 1 and 2 items can't be contested because of the 80s drug act, so it's an automatic forfeiture and no LL.  That's just if the pack only contains those items of course, so you might get an LL for a pack but the LL will only mention the benzos not the opis.    Also i once got an LL 10 months after the pack got seized.  And that was pre-pandemic.    Any vendor not willing to see patterns and make serious changes to their operations is definitely making a mistake in my opinion.   You should never get too comfortable. 

 
@Deepnorth    Not sure if this applies to you, but i don't think you would get an LL if the items are only sch 1 or 2.  The purpose of the LL isn't to say GOT YOU!!, but to legally notify of the seizure in case you want to contest it, but schedule 1 and 2 items can't be contested because of the 80s drug act, so it's an automatic forfeiture and no LL.  That's just if the pack only contains those items of course, so you might get an LL for a pack but the LL will only mention the benzos not the opis.    Also i once got an LL 10 months after the pack got seized.  And that was pre-pandemic.    Any vendor not willing to see patterns and make serious changes to their operations is definitely making a mistake in my opinion.   You should never get too comfortable. 
Thank you for that. My fear is this vendor will become more hit and miss. It’s obvious something is wrong. I will post it soon but obvious I don’t want to post while it’s on a farm visiting or something. The vendor is certain they have “taken “ it or “lost it” but the pattern is the pattern.

 
There has also been an insane number of weather related disasters and world events so anything is really possible.  There was that entire cargo ship that sank recently but i think it was just luxury cars.  Oh and that massive container ship that was stuck in Chesapeake Bay just got freed yesterday after sitting for 5 weeks i think.   I doubt there was any mail on that at all, but disruptions cause more and more disruptions down the line.  Can always be a bit tricky to know, until YOU KNOW lol.   Good luck to everyone and sorry you all have MIA packs!

 
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. D @ drdrizzy13: Yeah it was definitely a hold. Can't blame the refs for calling it. But I've seen many sketchy calls in the past to help the spread or over/under lol.
  2. Maelstrom @ Maelstrom: Wonder how much money was impacted by that last touchdown and holding call back. The refs were flirting with the over/under payoffs… that flag either cost a lot people some money or won them a bunch. But I guess you can’t say it was a bad call, just a very impactful one.
  3. shoutback @ shoutback: Fucking A nfl season is over :( Those were by and far the best teams this season. That Elite D will just stifle mofos. And ya gotta give Darnold his flowers for taking care of the football. That was professional.
  4. M @ meepmoopmeep: Too bad that football season is over now
  5. M @ meepmoopmeep: Seahawks offense left more to be desired (esp during first half) but patriots offense was just abysmal. A win is a win though. Squawk squawk!
  6. shoutback @ shoutback: Excuse me ladies and gentlemen, I seem to have left a little squawk here and little squawk there
  7. L @ Layne_Cobain: Hey now @tiquanunderwood split the uprights my boy 😂 😂 jp homie
  8. L @ Layne_Cobain: I want Darnold to win it so bad classy guy all he’s been through
  9. L @ Layne_Cobain: LETS GO HAWKS F**K THE PATSIES
  10. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: I have a girl coming over that's pretty cool. Besides that just chillin and making some food,.
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: I have tix to the Saints and Colts superbowl but sold them.
  12. D @ drdrizzy13: Anybody got any fun plans for the Superbowl?
  13. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: GO MIKE MACDONALD AND THE HAWKS BABY!
  14. shoutback @ shoutback: Thanks 😊
  15. D @ drdrizzy13: Have a good run bro.
  16. D @ drdrizzy13: yeah i'd rather them win than the Pats
  17. shoutback @ shoutback: Oh and GO SEAHAWKS
  18. shoutback @ shoutback: Anyways I have to get ready to go on my run, it's been fun talking
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: I think when we have open discourse without preconceptions we all agree more than we disagree
  20. D @ drdrizzy13: Oh I totally agree and I agree the War on Drugs was and is a complete failure.
Back
Top