Why do newer stims get such a bad rap

TheArm

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
48
Mostly all of stims are covered, but not so much the newer ones. I realize here and other places have this answered or debated many, many times. Reddit, I don't trust, here I do.

Anyways, stims like HEP, Hexylone, 4FPD, MF-PVP, MDPEP etc, HAVE to have some form of worth to them. I just don't see the point in synthesizing things that, basically amount to nothing (seems to be the case). It seems it'd be better to simply cut out stims entirely from a vendor's stock. (Eb-canq, lol, from RCBS(according to another vendor's site, ebk =bk-bbdp as shown on the paper from the analysis to identify it), I swear was a fucking mentally-handicapped high school kid's failed lab experiment. It made me furious, the only thing I ever threw away. Why, how, and who the hell  thought it was a good idea. Whoever manufacturers these should make micro-batches, that have a few unbiased "testers" to inform them when they made a mistake. Yes, I see the how that's a dumb statement, like pre-sale testers.

If they DO have "pre-testers" on deck, they don't value them or listen to them. Sure, let's cook up a batch of Butyl-Pentylone, instead of Eutylone. The only material I have ever encountered that, even in PG, is totally insoluble and catches on fire but doesn't vape or smoke, but literally catches fire! It's basically, non-psychotropic, overpriced poison at that point. Someone needs a punch in the throat for being a shitty chemist, in a planet of 8 billion people, fucking hire a better one. Seriously.

Apologies for the huge rant, but it's such am irritating thing to me. My hope was to hear some neutral/positive feedback on the newest stims. I want to take a gamble with mf-pvp. The long period between this, and the chems I mentioned earlier, leads me to believe these were more thoughtful creations. I do find it hard to believe that a-pihp is the last possible success.

 
not as good.

Ex: a-pvp was popular and loved --> banned --> a-php -->banned --> worse (but legal) a-pxp analogues.

Like all companies, producers main concern is profit, so they will sell any legal chem they can regardless of effects

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Leggo Minter baby!
  2. Gracie5 @ Gracie5: All the answers and more discussion about the types of boxes is accessible with Search. Mostly you can find this under Shipping and Tracking. When you search mailboxes you find numerous entries.
  3. Bodix @ Bodix: But this was a few years ago
  4. R @ RedMan39: I almost feel bad for Josh Allen he’s just getting older I can’t believe they fired mcdermot
  5. xenxra @ xenxra: the almighty search bar reveals all
  6. P @ PassiveTime: Is here still here?
  7. M @ meepmoopmeep: hawks for sure
  8. M @ meepmoopmeep: the end of that cfp championship game was an ass clencher
  9. shoutback @ shoutback: Not talking anything from the Pats but sheesh that Hawks team is looking fierce
  10. shoutback @ shoutback: So between the pats and hawks, what's your pick? Got the Hawks all day with that treacherous defense and special teams plus that explosive offense. They gotta be the fav
  11. D @ drdrizzy13: no doubt
  12. Thoth @ Thoth: Josh Allen will be 1st Ballot HOF
  13. D @ drdrizzy13: word I wanted Josh Allen to win a Superbowl. They've been so close for a few years now. Josh Allen messed up last game.
  14. R @ RedMan39: Agreed sucks the bills didn’t make it
  15. M @ meepmoopmeep: I think pats vs hawks superbowl
  16. M @ meepmoopmeep: saying that as a rams fan
  17. M @ meepmoopmeep: The rams are definitely good but I don’t believe they are seahawk level good
  18. L @ Layne_Cobain: Especially sucks the bills didn’t pull it off now since Nix is out and even with that Denver defense predict pats have an easy route to Super Bowl now…pats rams or pats hawks rematch? Perhaps
  19. shoutback @ shoutback: The Hawks look STRONG
  20. R @ RedMan39: Yeah my teams not in it (as usual) so just hoping for good games not blowouts lol
Back
Top