Why do newer stims get such a bad rap

TheArm

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
53
Mostly all of stims are covered, but not so much the newer ones. I realize here and other places have this answered or debated many, many times. Reddit, I don't trust, here I do.

Anyways, stims like HEP, Hexylone, 4FPD, MF-PVP, MDPEP etc, HAVE to have some form of worth to them. I just don't see the point in synthesizing things that, basically amount to nothing (seems to be the case). It seems it'd be better to simply cut out stims entirely from a vendor's stock. (Eb-canq, lol, from RCBS(according to another vendor's site, ebk =bk-bbdp as shown on the paper from the analysis to identify it), I swear was a fucking mentally-handicapped high school kid's failed lab experiment. It made me furious, the only thing I ever threw away. Why, how, and who the hell  thought it was a good idea. Whoever manufacturers these should make micro-batches, that have a few unbiased "testers" to inform them when they made a mistake. Yes, I see the how that's a dumb statement, like pre-sale testers.

If they DO have "pre-testers" on deck, they don't value them or listen to them. Sure, let's cook up a batch of Butyl-Pentylone, instead of Eutylone. The only material I have ever encountered that, even in PG, is totally insoluble and catches on fire but doesn't vape or smoke, but literally catches fire! It's basically, non-psychotropic, overpriced poison at that point. Someone needs a punch in the throat for being a shitty chemist, in a planet of 8 billion people, fucking hire a better one. Seriously.

Apologies for the huge rant, but it's such am irritating thing to me. My hope was to hear some neutral/positive feedback on the newest stims. I want to take a gamble with mf-pvp. The long period between this, and the chems I mentioned earlier, leads me to believe these were more thoughtful creations. I do find it hard to believe that a-pihp is the last possible success.

 
not as good.

Ex: a-pvp was popular and loved --> banned --> a-php -->banned --> worse (but legal) a-pxp analogues.

Like all companies, producers main concern is profit, so they will sell any legal chem they can regardless of effects

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: Yet another Friday! We made it! Everyone be safe out there!
  2. Jason @ Jason: Glad we are back :)
  3. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: @pyro396 yes,if you had a review that was lost ,rewrite it and post.
  4. PlanetExpress @ PlanetExpress: Welcome back DBG!
  5. xenxra @ xenxra: that would be beneficial for everybody i would imagine there's also some flack for poor vendors that was lost
  6. P @ pyro396: That was scary lol happy to see everyone again! Should reviews for vends be reposted if they got removed in the crash?
  7. J @ jas7788: I'm glad DBG is safe and up and running again 🙏💙
  8. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: Hopefully admin can get all recent sponsors back up, I'm sure there is a plan
  9. RonaldDonald @ RonaldDonald: Glad we’re back! :cool:
  10. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: Glad to see the site back up , server overload or what?!
  11. Cgunshow @ Cgunshow: Def was spooked. Good to be back
  12. st1ckyf1ng4z @ st1ckyf1ng4z: dude @Admin I was tripplin. Good to be back, indeed!
  13. T @ Texas11: Thanks for the update was scared for a sec
  14. DutchRCshop @ DutchRCshop: Happy to have you back! I was scared for a moment lol
  15. A @ AnnaSofia: Thanks for update @Admin !
  16. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: oh no
  17. Admin @ Admin: Unfortunately the main server crashed, some files got corrupted and we lost almost 3 weeks of data. The database has been restored from a backup from early August. Members that registered after August 2, can register again. Members that donated after August 2, kindly email me to re-instate your sponsorship as we can verify it with our records. GOOD TO BE BACK!!
  18. xenxra @ xenxra: no bueno
  19. L @ Layne_Cobain: Seems like everything is missing going back to 8/2
  20. L @ Layne_Cobain: Weeeee back!!
Back
Top