RealChems.com

Sbcat631 said:
What do you mean
Click to expand...
Just speculating here, but my guess is it removes a certain amount of plausible deniability in the case of a pack getting seized. I hadn’t considered this when using a similar service, but it does require ID and proof of residence and links you directly to the pack. In the same way that people say law enforcement might demonstrate guilt by doing a fake delivery and having you sign for something (indicating you were expecting something), you must acknowledge and manually forward the pack from the company’s mailbox to your house, again indicating that you were expecting something. I suppose the argument could be made that “Hey, they said I got mail, I just wanted to see what it was”, but it still begs the question of why you bothered opening the account with the reshipping company and why the only activity it sees is with these same packs from the same place.   
 

That said, I really hope I’m overthinking it because I would love to continue utilizing such a service. NL’s too good to lose, but I recently received my first love letter and I’m not keen on being so overtly attached to any subsequent interceptions. 

 
Sbcat631 said:
What do you mean
Click to expand...


Godzilla said:
Just speculating here, but my guess is it removes a certain amount of plausible deniability in the case of a pack getting seized. I hadn’t considered this when using a similar service, but it does require ID and proof of residence and links you directly to the pack. In the same way that people say law enforcement might demonstrate guilt by doing a fake delivery and having you sign for something (indicating you were expecting something), you must acknowledge and manually forward the pack from the company’s mailbox to your house, again indicating that you were expecting something. I suppose the argument could be made that “Hey, they said I got mail, I just wanted to see what it was”, but it still begs the question of why you bothered opening the account with the reshipping company and why the only activity it sees is with these same packs from the same place.   
 

That said, I really hope I’m overthinking it because I would love to continue utilizing such a service. NL’s too good to lose, but I recently received my first love letter and I’m not keen on being so overtly attached to any subsequent interceptions. 
Click to expand...
This exactly is what I mean. 

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. MrFuszy @ MrFuszy: Hello yall
  2. AlHoffman69 @ AlHoffman69: back stvthgd
  3. Acidwizard @ Acidwizard: Terrific Tuesday Everyone!
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Happy Monday!
  5. AlHoffman69 @ AlHoffman69: TADYA IS THE AYH STAHY THHD
  6. nameofuser11 @ nameofuser11: Set a reasonable limit. Hell fucking make it like buying cold medicine where they swipe your id and you can't get a bunch. But we know this isn't about logic or public safety. It's about money and control.
  7. nameofuser11 @ nameofuser11: AKA are such a bunch of fucking capitalist traitors. The liquor lobby has a lot of money in this as well.
  8. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: The major plain leaf companies and the AKA are the ones lobbying against 7 and the other semi-sythetic derivatives, mgm this that and the other. We all know the chemist are just gonna mess with the scaffolding of the compounds and come out with new and even better semi-sythetic alkoloids of kratom. They are already playing with cats-claw
  9. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: @moai just asked chatgpeetea and it looks like plain leaf kratom is safe, they arent banning it. Just 7-Hydroxymitragynine, MGM15 ,16 , and pseudoindoxyl
  10. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: Wait... @moai they are federally banning plain leaf kratom too???
  11. moai @ moai: @MorphineOrfan how fucking stupid is this shit. We better see some new shit come out, I’m most upset about banning regular kratom because really? Millions of people have got off hard opioids with it. They must want everyone on methadone instead.
  12. F @ frankie dicks: Gil
  13. F @ frankie dicks: Ghb
  14. Gulp2788 @ Gulp2788: If bans were done to logic so much of what is illegal now would end up prescription only and I think the powers that be react faster than they think... if they think at all
  15. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: They aren't specifically targeting SR and 7oh
  16. MorfineOrfan @ MorfineOrfan: @RiftChems well sr-17018 is an orphine analogue after all, and they are banning all orphines so that makes sense. Orphines are spiking the OD death rates majorly these past few months.
  17. AlHoffman69 @ AlHoffman69: CANDYMAN ramnemnber thta is will be conme relevenaent soon :alien: :cool: :cool: :cool: 🤑
  18. RiftChems @ RiftChems: crazy they are banning SR17018 at the same time. they know what theyre doing.
  19. nameofuser11 @ nameofuser11: The ban of 7oh is gonna have a lot of people needing help soon. Assuming they do ban instead of regulate like they should
  20. AlHoffman69 @ AlHoffman69: shout out to all our vets and citizens this is our day of pride love all of ya 🌭
Back
Top