Just speculating here, but my guess is it removes a certain amount of plausible deniability in the case of a pack getting seized. I hadn’t considered this when using a similar service, but it does require ID and proof of residence and links you directly to the pack. In the same way that people say law enforcement might demonstrate guilt by doing a fake delivery and having you sign for something (indicating you were expecting something), you must acknowledge and manually forward the pack from the company’s mailbox to your house, again indicating that you were expecting something. I suppose the argument could be made that “Hey, they said I got mail, I just wanted to see what it was”, but it still begs the question of why you bothered opening the account with the reshipping company and why the only activity it sees is with these same packs from the same place.Sbcat631 said:
That said, I really hope I’m overthinking it because I would love to continue utilizing such a service. NL’s too good to lose, but I recently received my first love letter and I’m not keen on being so overtly attached to any subsequent interceptions.
⬇️ ⬇️