RealChems.com

Sbcat631 said:
What do you mean
Click to expand...
Just speculating here, but my guess is it removes a certain amount of plausible deniability in the case of a pack getting seized. I hadn’t considered this when using a similar service, but it does require ID and proof of residence and links you directly to the pack. In the same way that people say law enforcement might demonstrate guilt by doing a fake delivery and having you sign for something (indicating you were expecting something), you must acknowledge and manually forward the pack from the company’s mailbox to your house, again indicating that you were expecting something. I suppose the argument could be made that “Hey, they said I got mail, I just wanted to see what it was”, but it still begs the question of why you bothered opening the account with the reshipping company and why the only activity it sees is with these same packs from the same place.   
 

That said, I really hope I’m overthinking it because I would love to continue utilizing such a service. NL’s too good to lose, but I recently received my first love letter and I’m not keen on being so overtly attached to any subsequent interceptions. 

 
Sbcat631 said:
What do you mean
Click to expand...


Godzilla said:
Just speculating here, but my guess is it removes a certain amount of plausible deniability in the case of a pack getting seized. I hadn’t considered this when using a similar service, but it does require ID and proof of residence and links you directly to the pack. In the same way that people say law enforcement might demonstrate guilt by doing a fake delivery and having you sign for something (indicating you were expecting something), you must acknowledge and manually forward the pack from the company’s mailbox to your house, again indicating that you were expecting something. I suppose the argument could be made that “Hey, they said I got mail, I just wanted to see what it was”, but it still begs the question of why you bothered opening the account with the reshipping company and why the only activity it sees is with these same packs from the same place.   
 

That said, I really hope I’m overthinking it because I would love to continue utilizing such a service. NL’s too good to lose, but I recently received my first love letter and I’m not keen on being so overtly attached to any subsequent interceptions. 
Click to expand...
This exactly is what I mean. 

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: Likewise
  2. J @ jjjjjjjjj: Wishing everyone a good and safe weekend!
  3. J @ jjjjjjjjj: @Logan9fingers Yw, made me very happy to see your username
  4. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: Lamar will be back Sunday! All our hopes are on him carrying us.
  5. tiquanunderwood @ tiquanunderwood: hope everyone has a safe weekend!
  6. L @ Logan9fingers: @jjjjjjjjj thanks man, I’ve been waiting forever for someone to het that reference
  7. O @ oh be g: Sorry could you double check now
  8. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: I'm not seeing anything
  9. O @ oh be g: Ket mind checking ur dm when u get a sec got a question for ya not sure if ya can help
  10. kemdawg99 @ kemdawg99: Is bob from C's telegram here?
  11. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: *exit scammed
  12. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: So was I, they caught R but C dipped immediately bc people are saying he's still seeing their messages but not responding
  13. J @ jsntwg: So I was kind of friends with see for a while. We did a lot of work, but I’ve distance myself for safety reasons. Is it true? Did they catch up to them?
  14. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: they were def not affiliated, I know for a fact C hated R, he literally told me that when I was a mod on his telegram
  15. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: Bc he was likely next
  16. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: both C and R's sites were on the same server, server OPSEC is what got R caught up so C panicked and exit scammed
  17. Ketmaster @ Ketmaster: @afrothunder C
  18. xenxra @ xenxra: no they're def not the same op. i think r just helped c bootstrap the storefront he was using
  19. T @ timyboy: If you actually ordered from R and C and emailed them you would know they are nothing alike
  20. xenxra @ xenxra: considering all the turmoil about right now, i feel obligated to mention that i had a discussion with auto last summer where he said he would be retiring within the next year or two. count your blessings before they're gone.
Back
Top